Not really..everyone who bought the orange pros… that novelty will possibly wear off in a few weeks (or after Halloween) as well and they will be bored of their color choice 🤷🏻♂️That’s an absurd thing to say.
Not really..everyone who bought the orange pros… that novelty will possibly wear off in a few weeks (or after Halloween) as well and they will be bored of their color choice 🤷🏻♂️That’s an absurd thing to say.
No. Hand feel between base 17 and Air is not close. You’d think so based on weight but based on density, base 17 is in fact 18% more dense because it’s smaller. It is very noticeable. When both are in cases, which add to the size, base 17 feels as chonky as older 14 PM.
The actual math doesn't agree with you unfortunately. Maybe it's something subjective.
iPhone Air: 2.51 g/cm³
iPhone 17: 2.08 g/cm³
iPhone 14 Pro Max: 2.45 g/cm³
Are you sure you are calculating 17’s density properly? Please note: base 17 is both smaller and heavier. Air is 165g in weight. Base 17 is 177g.
Yes, definitely. The math is simple, just take the weight and divide by (height x width x depth).
Air being less dense than base 17 doesn't pass the sanity test. Apple is packing as much stuff into as little volume as possible to make it thin. How could Air possibly be less dense than base 17?
Oof the Halloween line was brutal 😭Not really..everyone who bought the orange pros… that novelty will possibly wear off in a few weeks (or after Halloween) as well and they will be bored of their color choice 🤷🏻♂️
Not really..everyone who bought the orange pros… that novelty will possibly wear off in a few weeks (or after Halloween) as well and they will be bored of their color choice 🤷🏻♂️
Edit: I see what’s going on. You’re going by Apple’s published dimensions without considering the plateau so Air will come out to have a significantly lower overall volume compared to base 17. Account for the plateau, which adds basically another 3mm of protrusion or so, and you’ll arrive at the right density for Air.
I edited my post above. If you’re going by Apple’s published numbers, you may arrive at the wrong volume for Air.
Add the plateau and you’ll get the right volume.
So I’ve been rocking a ProMax for as long as they existed. Upgraded from 16promax.
Bit the bullet and thought I would try the Air. I’m always about thing/light, and I would say the ProMax has been getting chunky every year.
However, after only 2 days with the Air, I’m still torn on this device. Anyone else considering returning theirs? I have 2weeks to decide.
Things that are irking me:
Single camera, I thought I could get away with it, but yesterday after being outside and taking some photos, I noticed right away I miss the .5x so I don’t have to walk back to get a certain shot. Also my pics seem more blurry now, not sure if there is something in ProMax that was dealing with my hand moving while taking a photo?
Speakers - I think I can live with this downgrade, you definitely notice the difference, the base is almost non-exsistant and you can tell audio is coming from one side, but it’s not horrible.
Battery - on Saturday my 1st full day, off the charger at 6am, and was out of juice at around 6pm. I had the battery pack so I filled up there and also in car that evening. ProMax usually gets me 1.25ish days on no charge. However again, i would say I can also live with this downgrade. - I would say borderline acceptable. But after some time and charge cycles when battery is wore out, tihs will be unusable.
So in conclusion, the camera is my deal killer for me and I can’t see to get over that hump.
Anyone with an Air considering returning and getting the ProMax??
If your always about light the Promax is never that
Anyway regardless of that the air will have limitations compared to other phones and certainly the pros
I tested the air in the shop and the camera appeared ok, until I took the same pictures on the pro. Zooming in on the detail it wasn't there and put it 100% off the air....Its years behind
The standard pro is the best middle ground this year
Plateau only adds about to the 5,400 mm³ equation. It's 3.3 mm in depth, about 60 mm wide, and 30 mm height.
It drops the density to about 2.3 g/cm³. The Air is still more dense than base 17 of 2.08 g/cm³.
Again, it doesn't pass the sanity test the Air could possibly be less dense than base 17.
Yeah the close-up pictures are a bit of a problem. Using the 2x instead somewhat solves it though.I bought the Air and returned it for the 17 Pro.
The mono speaker was literally making me nauseas when watching YouTube in land scape. It feels uncomfortable hearing sound from only one side for extended periods.
I also didn’t realize the camera isn’t capable of taking up closer photos. I was taking a photo of a clothing label with really small text and the single camera was incapable of even taking the photo and that’s when I decided to return it. I’m not even a pro photographer. I just needed to take pictures of something to sell something on eBay.
Agree with you about the close-up photo quality, but I think the best middle ground this year is actually a standard 17.
Yeah the close-up pictures are a bit of a problem. Using the 2x instead somewhat solves it though.
In case of the base 17, fine you have a point however in case of the Air,. for the majority the cost isn’t the issue. People aren’t buying the Air because they can’t afford the Pro, they’re buying the Air because the Pro is becoming increasingly unwieldy and as the case of this generation of phones , unsightly.It's a hard one and yeah the standard 17 is good but just for a little extra the pro has it all. For many people the standard 17 is perfect but there is still some pro features and the ultimate phone is the pro
Battery, camera
👏👏Shouldn’t you be out celebrating? Not that I don’t appreciate the iPhone commentary 🤣
I got a 17PM to replace my 13PM because of the cameras.I’m still undecided. I love how thin and light it is.
The speaker is a non-issue to me, I was honestly shocked to learn how many of you use phone speakers, but guess I’m in the minority 🤣
Battery life is fine. I made it from 6:30am->9:30pm yesterday (including an hour of watching F1 qualifying). At 9:30 I hit 10% and put on the battery pack - phone feels similar to pro max with the battery pack on.
Today I’m currently at 68% after 8 hours off charge. I’m making a point not to put it on the charger, but it’s really a non issue in day to day life. I have a MagSafe charger at my desk and wireless charging in my car. Battery isn’t going to be an issue, and those one-off days when it will be I’ve got the battery pack.
The camera is going to be the real test. Haven’t felt a need for other lenses yet, but I suspect it’s coming - I have a young kid.
Going to give it until Friday before deciding. If I had to guess I probably return it, but I am less sure about that now than I was when I ordered it, and I’m definitely going to be really annoyed about the thickness and weight if I do.
Finally someone who tells it how it is. I've seen far too many comments from people hating on Air and saying we only say it's the best phone out of this years line up because we can't afford the Pro models. Which is of course absolutely bollocks. Most of my past iPhones have been Pro's over the years. The price isn't the problem/issue.You’re missing the point. For the majority the cost isn’t the issue. People aren’t buying the Air because they can’t afford the Pro, they’re buying the Air because the Pro is becoming increasingly unwieldy and as the case of this generation of phones , unsightly.
Even the 16e, considering price and weight.If you want a smaller phone, either the 17 or regular Pro seem like better buys
The Accessory Design Guidelines give the plateau’s thickness as 3.03 mm, which makes for 8.67 mm total without the lens. With the lens it’s 11.32 mm. It sounds like your plateau measurement is off by 1 mm.The thickness of the phone with the plateau is actually 9.7mm from my caliper, which means it’s closer to a bit over 4mm in thickness. With the camera lens, it’s actually almost 12mm in overall thickness even.