Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It is not that noticeable. I have the studio display and a 4K 27” next to each other. I probably noticed for one day and that was it.
Hmmm. Interesting. I personally notice the difference a ton when competing my LG 5K 27” to my LG UW 32”.

Apple’s font smoothing has never been particularly good. It’s downright bad on 1440p displays, but I think it’s unacceptable on 4K displays. I‘Ve tried all 4 smoothing settings and was unhappy with both.

When on displays with higher pixel densities, including laptop built-in displays, it’s significantly better.
 
My laptop is 120hz, my phone is 120hz, my desktop monitors (home and work) are 60hz.

I can't tell any difference between the three.
Good for you, will save you lots of money in the long run. 60hz is very slow and choppy for me know. I need promotion on everything.
 


Any typical search for a consumer Mac monitor inevitably leads to the Apple Studio Display – a seamless but prohibitively expensive option for most users at $1,599. That's where BenQ's MA270U steps in, offering Mac-native features at a much more palatable $459.99.

benq-ma270u-27.jpg

Unlike typical PC monitors that often feel retrofitted for Mac compatibility, this is a 27-inch 4K display that arrives ready for MacBook use out of the box, complete with built-in color matching, keyboard integration, and even Focus mode support. But can a third-party monitor truly deliver Apple-like integration without the Apple price tag?

Key Display Specifications

  • 27-inch IPS panel with Nano Matte coating
  • 3840 x 2160 (4K) resolution
  • 400 nits peak brightness
  • 1200:1 native contrast ratio
  • 99% sRGB, 95% P3 color gamut
  • 60Hz refresh rate
  • 5ms response time
  • HDR10 with VESA Display HDR 400 certification
  • 178° viewing angles

Design and Build Quality

MA270U-2.jpeg

Peeling the protective material off the "Nano Matte" IPS panel reveals a thin black bezel around the top and sides, and a slightly thicker chin with the BenQ logo centered in an inoffensive, almost hidden black finish. The rear of the display is plastic with a metallic finish that curves outwards slightly, while the stand is a brushed metal pipe about 2.5 inches in diameter.

MA270U-4.jpeg

Assembly is extremely simple and requires no tools. You just click the neck of the stand to the back and then use the key-screw to fasten on the rectangular base, which includes a rubber strip along the front for placing accessories.

MA270U-3.jpg

Once the monitor was set up alongside my Apple Studio Display, BenQ's design perhaps inevitably looked a little dated. The monitor sports clean lines and thin bezels, but its predominantly plastic construction lacks Apple's signature sophistication. The aluminum-effect back cover tries to bridge this gap, though it can't match Apple's minimalist refinement and keen eye for curves and lines.

ma270u-5-1.jpeg

That said, build quality impresses where it matters. The steel neck provides rock-solid stability, while the soft-touch area on the base is a nice afterthought. While it won't win any design awards in my book, the construction feels reassuringly robust.

Connectivity and Setup

03-ma270u-product-03.jpeg

Connectivity-wise, the monitor is fairly well-accommodated round the back. The 90W USB-C port connects and provides power to your Mac, while an additional 15W USB-C port and one 7.5W USB-A port offer options for connecting other devices (in my case, a Bluetooth receiver for my mouse, and an external USB hard drive).

ma270U-6.jpeg

Crucially, the hub can provide power even when the display is off, so you can keep your MacBook and whatever else plugged in and charging regardless. There are also two HDMI 2.0 ports (sadly not 2.1), plus a headphone jack and an extra 7.5W USB-A port located under the panel, next to a glowing power button and a physical toggle to manually set brightness, volume, and display output.

ma270u-7.jpeg

Getting started couldn't have been easier. I plugged in the supplied USB-C cable and my MacBook Air instantly recognized the display and began drawing 90W of power from it. I also tried connecting to an M4 Mac mini, both directly and via a Ugreen Thunderbolt 4 dock, and had zero issues.

ma270u-8.jpeg

As I got comfortable with the setup, I was impressed by the flexibility of the MA270U's stand, offering a range of adjustments that make it easy to find your ideal viewing position. The height adjustment provides a generous 115mm of vertical travel, while the tilt mechanism allows the screen to move from -5° backward to 20° forward. Paired with 15° of swivel in each direction, you can fine-tune the display's position to minimize glare and maximize comfort. The robust stand keeps the display stable at any position, and the smooth pivot function rotates 90 degrees in either direction for portrait orientation viewing.

The built-in 3W speakers are adequate for system sounds but won't replace dedicated audio solutions – you won't be surprised to learn that they're noticeably inferior to MacBook speakers, and the less said about them the better.

Display Performance and Color Accuracy

Here's where the MA270U excels. The 60Hz panel's 3,840 x 2,160 resolution delivers crisp, vibrant visuals, while the 5ms response time is perfectly adequate (unless you're a hardcore FPS gamer). Colors pop without appearing oversaturated, and BenQ's color-matching technology is impressive – the difference between my MacBook Air's display and the MA270U was barely perceptible when using the recommended color profile. I even swapped out my Air for a MacBook Pro with a Liquid Retina XDR display, and only the brightness difference was visible. The monitor maintained consistent color reproduction across its 400 nits brightness range. Indeed, I was impressed with how good it looked alongside my Studio Display.

ma270u-10.jpeg

The Nano Matte panel handles glare admirably under normal conditions. However, direct sunlight remains challenging. It's not quite as effective as Apple's nano-texture glass option in this respect, but remember – that's a $300 upgrade on the Studio Display, which also boasts a higher 600 nits of brightness. One other thing worth mentioning is how fast the MA series monitor wakes from sleep – it impressively matched the speed of my Mac and the Studio Display.

Display Pilot 2 Software
... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Review: BenQ's Affordable MA270U 4K Monitor Is Made for MacBooks
Release a new 27 inch iMac and stop playing games with us.
 
While it seems like a great monitor - if it were actually affordable. I can buy a Samsung with probably the same LCD panel (same specs) for $150 less. I can buy a used 4K60 27" monitor for $100. (I did - six years ago.)
 
I have an original 27” LG Ultrafine 5K monitor from 2018, and there is still no compelling reason to upgrade. It’s still a better monitor than most of what is available on the market. Apple Display’s only advantage is 100 nits of brightness, and that relatively minor difference doesn’t justify the hefty upgrade cost. Despite the hype, very little has changed in the display market in the last 6 years.

The LG Ultrafine’s screen exhibits PWM flickering, which is bad for the eyes, unlike the Apple Studio Display, which lacks this issue. There are more differences between the displays in the LG and Apple Studio Display than just 100 nits.

PWM flickering on the iPhone or iPad is acceptable because you don’t spend all day staring at those displays, unlike a monitor for work.
 
Last edited:
But does that get you audio?
Presumably not a problem if you are augmenting a primary (HDMI) screen with a second screen, but an issue to be aware of if you want the USB-C as your only screen?
Gets you everything DisplayPort gets you - means Audio, Video, and usually you can also use a USB hub in the monitor, plus most displays these days also provide power. Huch much bandwidth you can use for that however depends on your resolution and refresh rate. 4K@60hz@10bit uses roughly 16 gb of bandwith, means it has to use most of the 20 gigs USB-C 3.2 offers, means your USB hub only gets the remainder of that. Most displays only offer USB2 anyways because of that. It's enough for Webcams and Card readers, and of course USB HIDs like Keyboard and Mice, but not for Gigabit Ethernet or storage. And most displays only offer 65 watts of power delivery. That's plenty for a MacBook Air, but a beefy MacBook Pro could periodically draw from battery under load, which will really degrade the battery over time even when in clamshell all year long.

It's what I used with my LG UltraFine 4K for before I got an actual Studio Display. I ran the LG as my sole screen for an M1 Mini for about 2 years before I moved to an M2 MBA. Both used the LG as the only display (the MBA ofc only when docked ...) without any (serious) issues. The MBA was connected with a single USB cable.

Waking up isn't as seemless as with a Studio Display, and it took a firmware refresh for the LG to properly go into sleep when the Mini did, and the webcam sometimes got "lost" when plugging the macbook back in, but all in all it's a good budget alternative. Just remember it's that: a budget alternative. (Doesn't mean it's made for Mac. It isn't. ^^)
 
I think it's because there is little demand for 5K from the Windows crowd. Windows has much better font scaling so people can quite happily use 4K 27" panels and retain sharp text, even when scaling to prevent UI elements that are too small. 5K demand is almost uniqely from the the Mac crowd (and therefore, a small percentage of the market).

This is the answer

Honestly, what everyone should be clamoring for is Apple to make non-integer scaling in macOS way way better

“Just” 4K looks phenomenal in Windows because their scaling is so much better
 
  • Like
Reactions: Altis and jeffpeng
Not bad. I just wish the industry could agree HDMI sucks and use DisplayPort everywhere instead.
 
Why is it so few non-Apple companies produce a 5K display? What I really want is a 27 inch 5k display with 600 nits of brightness (minimum). Are these too difficult to make?
At an affordable cost; probably yes. 😅
 
The may be OK if you don't care about quality. The Apple Studio Display is orders of magnitude better than any $400 display. You get what you pay for.
E-waste after 10 to 15 years that is what we are paying for.
 
It seems some people can spot the difference right away, and others not at all; I'm the same as you and can't see what the big deal is. For me, it's the brightness that makes a difference; I prefer at least 500 nits. Too bad, because otherwise this monitor seems like a decent value.
These people who CAN see the difference can only see it if you know which monitor that are looking at.

I've yet to find anyone who has done a blind test with a statistically large number of people.
 
^ this. I have two LG 5Ks and love ‘em. They hit 500 nits and are generally plenty bright for me, even when some afternoon sunlight (albeit indirect) comes in.
I have two LG 5Ks and two LG 4Ks. Still the best option if you can get them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: john123
400nits? But specs are often deceiving. You have to try it out to really know. But the market is flooded with 350 to 400 nits 4k monitors. Also, this 'Made for Apple' translates here to a price hike.

I recently bought a Samsung 5k S9 for $720 that's VERY nano, at 500nits. Granted, my 10 year old LG 21" 4k is actually too bright, but 500nits is what I would require at these prices. I don't game, so that's huge relief LOL.

This monitor is a decent deal at around $500 (maybe). There are others like this at that price.

Is MR going this route now, with these types of 'reviews'?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mvdrl
Apple got rid of subpixel aliasing some years ago, so low-ppi text looks very poor on them, much worse than it used to (and did the same to my old MacBook Air non-retina). There's nothing I can do to make the 1440p look good on macOS anymore. I only use that monitor with a Windows machine now.
You can still set the amount of font smoothing (though you can't reintroduce subpixel antialiasing, since it's now gone from macOS) using Terminal commands, but I don't know how well this might increase clarity of text displayed on a 4K monitor, since I don't have one, but it probably doesn't help much for recent versions of macOS, for which the value of AppleFontSmoothing is now 2 by default for all displays, including Retina (it used to be zero for Retina displays), and the highest you can go is 3, which isn't much of an increase.
 
Last edited:
And WHY are we comparing a 4K display with no camera and no speakers to the 5K Apple Studio Display?
Not even in the same league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mvdrl
The may be OK if you don't care about quality. The Apple Studio Display is orders of magnitude better than any $400 display. You get what you pay for.
All of my BenQ displays are amazing. Apple displays are way overpriced for what they do. Plus unless you pay extra for nano-texture, glassy displays are trash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakey rolling
Looks like a decent monitor. The 32" 4K version looks good to be paired with a Mac mini. Waiting to see whether there will be any price reduction before deciding to purchase one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.