Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,656
39,528


After years of there being few alternatives to the Apple-approved LG UltraFine 5K and later the Apple Studio Display in the 27-inch 5K display market, a number of new entrants have recently appeared to offer more options for consumers.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-mbp.jpg
ViewSonic 2788-5K

In just the past few months, we've taken a look at the ASUS ProArt Display 5K, the BenQ PD2730S, and the Alogic Clarity 5K Touch with its unique touchscreen capabilities, and most recently I've been testing out another new option, the $950 ViewSonic VP2788-5K, to see how it stacks up.

As background, I have been driving a pair of LG UltraFine 5K displays in my desk setup since 2016, and aside from some image retention issues that I've learned to live with, they work fantastically for my needs, so much so that I haven't seen the need to upgrade to the Apple Studio Display. Content looks great on the UltraFines, they work reliably, and they integrate with macOS to support convenient features such as volume and brightness keyboard shortcuts.

With those as my benchmark, I've been testing the ViewSonic VP2788-5K in daily use alongside one of my LG UltraFines, and I've found both positives and negatives with ViewSonic's offering.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-rear-separate.jpg

The VP2788-5K arrives in a fairly compact box, and as with most displays it requires a little bit of simple assembly. The hefty metal foot attaches to the display neck with a secure thumbscrew that is recessed slightly into the bottom of the foot to protect against scratching surfaces, and there is a click-in cover attachment for the rear of the display that simply slides into the top of the stand neck. If you prefer a VESA mounting solution, just leave that cover off and you can secure the display to any 100x100 VESA mount.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-rear.jpg

My first impressions of the general design of the VP2788-5K were relatively favorable, though aside from the sturdy metal stand base the construction is almost entirely black and dark gray plastic. Still, I find the design unobtrusive overall, which is mainly what I'm looking for as the content on the screen is what I'm most interested in. Bezels on the top and sides are fairly slim, with a bit thicker bezel on the bottom including some subtle ViewSonic branding. There's a bit of additional gray ViewSonic branding on the stand base.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-branding.jpg

The VP2788-5K excels in positional flexibility, supporting not just height (120 mm range) and tilt (5º forward to 22º back) adjustments but also up to 30º of swivel right or left and 90º of pivot right or left if you prefer to use the display in portrait mode. While the Apple Studio Display supports tilt adjustment on the base model, height adjustment is a $400 stand upgrade, and swivel and pivot are not supported at all.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-portrait.jpg

For cable management, the VP2788-5K includes a hole in the stand neck, and it's high enough that it's well hidden behind the display to keep those cables out of sight as much as possible. Only if you push the display toward its highest position will the cables and hole become visible.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-rear-stand.jpg

Whereas Apple and LG kept connectivity simple on their displays with only a single Thunderbolt 3 input, ViewSonic has included several options to support not just Macs but Windows PCs and other devices. There's an upstream Thunderbolt 4 port for easy Mac connectivity, plus an HDMI 2.1 port, a DisplayPort 1.4 port, and an upstream USB-C port. On the downstream side, there's a second Thunderbolt 4 port, a 15-watt USB-C port, and a pair of 10-watt USB-A ports, with the extra Thunderbolt port allowing for daisy-chained displays via a single connection on supported computers. Cables for the various connector types are included in the box.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-ports.jpg

All of the ports are located on the rear of the display in a downward-facing orientation, with some located near the bottom of the display and others sitting up a bit higher on the back. While the downward-facing ports can allow the display to be placed flatter against walls or other surfaces when on a VESA mount and perhaps result in less stress on cables with gravity pulling in line with the cable rather than perpendicularly, they do make cables attached to some of the ports visible from in front of the display.

viewsonic-vp2788-5k-cables.jpg

For example, the main Thunderbolt port used for connecting to my MacBook Pro is flush with the bottom of the display, so the cable connector sticks straight down out of the display. That results in some visual clutter, and the connector can be easily bumped if you're trying to move items around under the display. Most of the ports are a bit higher on the back of the display, keeping any connectors hidden away from view, and I'm not entirely sure why all of the ports weren't designed in this way for a cleaner look.

That upstream Thunderbolt 4 port can supply up to 100 watts of charging power to a connected computer, so you won't need an additional power source to keep your MacBook charged up. That's a competitive amount of power output, as many other options offer more like 90 watts or even less. The display does use an external power brick of its own, so keep in mind you will need to hide that away somewhere on the floor or your desk.

Turning to the actual display, the VP2788-5K offers up to 500 nits of brightness, which has proven to be plenty bright in my work enviro... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: Review: ViewSonic's VP2788-5K Display Offers a Cheaper Alternative to Apple's Studio Display
 
I ended up getting the Samsung G9 Odyssey 49" OLED 240Hz. I just couldn't wait any longer for the updated Studio Display haha.

EDIT: The monitor let's me split it between two different sources. Works perfectly for splitting the Mac Studio with my work/PC. Simply reduces the need for me to have multiple monitors. OLED because it was on sale haha.
 
Last edited:
I'm still (im)patiently waiting for the 32" 5K and 6K monitors. 60 Hz is totally fine for me for something like that.
I think 27” is 5k and 32” is always 6k. Maybe it has something to do with pixel size but IDK. If you want a 32” 6k monitor the Apple Store sells them. Not cheap of course.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: MrENGLISH
I think 27” is 5k and 32” is always 6k. Maybe it has something to do with pixel size but IDK.
That is incorrect. There will be 5K 32" (or 31.5") monitors available within the year. However, it appears the first one to come will be a gaming monitor, and it's has a fugly design, so I'm not so interested in that one. That leaves the 6K 32" monitors...

If you want a 32” 6k monitor the Apple Store sells them. Not cheap of course.
I guess you missed all the articles and posts about the slew of new non-Apple 32" 6K monitors coming out this year. That's what I'm waiting for.
 
That is incorrect. There will be 5K 32" (or 31.5") monitors available within the year. However, it appears the first one to come will be a gaming monitor, and it's has a fugly design, so I'm not so interested in that one. That leaves the 6K 32" monitors...
Well, I only know what I’ve seen for sale. I guess I’m not keeping up to what was shown at CES or coming out in the future. It’s nice to see other options for people who may not need a top end monitor but still want 5K resolution.


I guess you missed all the articles and posts about the slew of new non-Apple 32" 6K monitors coming out this year. That's what I'm waiting for.
I guess I did. I was just talking about the one I know of, but if something else is coming out in the future, definitely wait.

I wouldn’t mind a more budget orientated 27” 5K to go with a Mac mini.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artifex
Again it is only a poor matte display :( A matt coating reduces the display quality, so you might as well stick with 4K.
Why don't the manufacturers finally offer glossy 220PPI displays!
I’m not a fan of matte displays. For me glossy displays make everything look much clearer. It’s really difficult to find a non-Apple branded monitor that’s glossy. I’ve seen a few, but they’re not common.
 
With my 27” iMac nearing retirement age I’m in the market for a 27” 5K monitor to go with a Mini, and I’ve had good experiences with ViewSonic at work since the early days of LCD monitors. The ViewSonic 4K OLED portable I use currently is fantastic in terms of display quality, so I kinda had high hopes for this.

But putting the upstream TB4 port flush with the bottom? Lost my business right there.

Flush ports are fine, but only for stuff you plug in temporarily—that’s where your spare downstream USB port or maybe headphone jack goes.

It’s funny, because Dell’s monitors have almost exactly this design, and it looks like ViewSonic even copied the Dell click-in mount… but instead of putting temp ports on the bottom edge like Dell does they stick the main dang port there. It’s like they did a direct copy of a nice Ultrasharp but didn’t understand why it was designed that way.

The off-center hole is also just weird.
 
It feels like we are paying a premium for old tech. Samsung teased a 27" 5k OLED monitor at CES in January. That will likely be 120hz and the monitor with show up at the next CES, with this OLED panel becoming available in other brand's monitors as well.

I'll just wait for this as it should be a big jump in image quality over the existing 27" 5k monitors where the display panel hasn't changed in almost 10 years.
 
I'm surprised that you don't hear anything new from Dell in the 5K and 6K (or even 8K) range. I'm not talking about the DELL U3224KB, which is almost 2 years old.

Do any of you know if there will be any new announcements from Dell, because I would normally prefer a Dell monitor because they have good manufacturer quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: V.K.
A decent 27" 5K monitor should have been available for under $500 for many years. Capitalism is somehow failing us on this front.

The market is too small to really drive down prices, especially when it was just LG providing panels. It is also too small to really drive innovation since, as noted above, the majority of these panels are going into monitors used in general purpose computing tasks where 60Hz is sufficiently adequate.

BoE entering the market in the past couple of years (and whom I believe provide the panels for the majority of the new entrants) has at least dropped the average MSRP from ~USD1400 to ~USD1000.
 
The author said:
"I have been driving a pair of LG UltraFine 5K displays in my desk setup since 2016, and aside from some image retention issues that I've learned to live with..."

WHAT? Living with image retention? I guess some are satisfied with terrible image quality. Not me.

This monitor sounds worthless at any price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
The author said:
"I have been driving a pair of LG UltraFine 5K displays in my desk setup since 2016, and aside from some image retention issues that I've learned to live with..."

WHAT? Living with image retention? I guess some are satisfied with terrible image quality. Not me.

This monitor sounds worthless at any price.
It’s about money. Everything is a compromise. He’s living with some issues in order to save money. Try living with a $250 32” 1080P monitor 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: ignatius345
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.