Revised Mac mini now shipping?

QCassidy352 said:
Lastly, I agree with the poster who said this is nothing to be excited about. You will not notice a speed difference here, and I'm not sure what the extra VRAM on a terrible card is going to do for you. Maybe a few extra frames per second in world of warcraft... not much. 1.5 and 64 sound nicer than 1.42 and 32, but the reality is that it's a miniscule improvement (pardon the pun).


I disagree! I have a mini and the video card definitely feels slugish at times, especially with Expose and Dashboard. I also think the faster hard drive will make some difference in the overall responsiveness when opening programs, for example. :cool:
 
bodeh6 said:
They should have upgraded the GPU to the Radeon 9550 with 64MB.

The eMac has a Radeon 9600 with 64MB - it's been using that card for almost 5 months. I will not purchase a Mac mini until they up that stupid Radeon 9200... come on... an additional 32MB of memory doesn't cut it.

The Mac mini has been using the same video card since it's introduction 9 months ago.
 
areyouwishing said:
Not that anyone cares, but im seriously considering selling my rev1 mini 1.42 for this thing, what a treat. 64mb and 5400 are NICE fixes.

Shhh.... don't tell the "power" users here. They don't know why anyone would get excited over this little bump. To them, we're just quibbling over low-end scraps :rolleyes:
 
lickily said:
Shhh.... don't tell the "power" users here. They don't know why anyone would get excited over this little bump. To them, we're just quibbling over low-end scraps :rolleyes:

oh yes, the ones with the "power"books. see, i did FCP on my 12" and now 2 years later people think that on a 4200rpm w/ 32mb machine it can't be done. After generating a lot of revenue on both these little machines i know what they are capable of... a lot. This makes the mac mini that much more sweet.
 
1984 said:
The Radeon 9200 GPU does not support it which means the G4 will have to do the work for it. This results in a slowdown for such tasks. One such task, the ripple effect, is so slow when done on the G4 CPU instead of the GPU that Apple had to disable it all together. People tend to think Core Image is only good for eye candy such as the ripple effect but they are mistaken. There are a great many things that a Core Image compatible GPU speeds up (as much as 300% in some cases) and as a bonus it frees up the CPU to do more as well.

Well done.

...bonus it frees up the CPU to do more as well
 
Buy one when you need one.

Even with familiar 10% upgrade in 6-month interval, 'normal' people is OK to get one when they need one. Some geeks like us search for rumors and buy one just after upgrades.

With new "stealth upgrade" (TM), 6% + others upgrade in 2-month or less, more will buy one when they need one.
 
Core Image question

I've been waiting for this Mac mini update to hold me over until the Intel Macs. Can someone explain what exactly I'd lose if the mini doesn't support Core Image? I'm not a developer - just work with Flash, Photoshop, Pages, Excel, etc. Thanks in advance.
 
"Sources have informed Think Secret that Mac mini box labels will continue to list the older specifications with no indication of whether the newer or older systems are contained within. The motivation behind this is to help clear current inventory without lowering prices. Essentially, customers are promised that the Mac mini they purchase will have specifications "at least" equal to the label, but that their system may exceed those. Customers who purchase a new Mac mini to find they ended up with the older configuration will not be able to return the system in the hopes of getting the newer configuration without paying a restocking fee." - thinksecret update

CAN APPLE BE ANY MORE F***ING CHEAPER? Just donot send out the new ones untill you are done with your inventory. I cannot believe that they are this much retarded. Is this a form of playing a lottery? I think just to f*** with them people should not buy the product till they come out and post the darn update! :mad: :mad:
 
BobMcBob said:
Uh, look at the screenshot where it says "Core Image: Not Supported".


hey boby boy, uh, notice that it says "Core Image: Not Supported" under the GPU catagory. the CPU will still work with it.

didnt you read the links he supplied? dont you believe apple? hmm.
 
budugu said:
"Sources have informed Think Secret that Mac mini box labels will continue to list the older specifications with no indication of whether the newer or older systems are contained within. The motivation behind this is to help clear current inventory without lowering prices. Essentially, customers are promised that the Mac mini they purchase will have specifications "at least" equal to the label, but that their system may exceed those. Customers who purchase a new Mac mini to find they ended up with the older configuration will not be able to return the system in the hopes of getting the newer configuration without paying a restocking fee." - thinksecret update

I just lost a lot of respect for Apple. You might get a new one... or you might not. You pay your money and you take your chances. What kind of crap is this? Just lower the price on the previous models like any other company would do. I hope they get sued over this.
 
budugu said:
CAN APPLE BE ANY MORE F***ING CHEAPER? Just donot send out the new ones untill you are done with your inventory. I cannot believe that they are this much retarded. Is this a form of playing a lottery? I think just to f*** with them people should not buy the product till they come out and post the darn update! :mad: :mad:


why would this upset you? especially after you saying that apple should just wait to release the update until they sell their inventory? at least now you will get a chance of getting a better system if your in the market for a mini. and if you can wait then wait till the box notates the specs you want.

i think its cool of apple. i really cant see why you would be mad. but thanks for the laugh.
 
1984 said:
I just lost a lot of respect for Apple. You might get a new one... or you might not. You pay your money and you take your chances. What kind of crap is this? Just lower the price on the previous models like any other company would do. I hope they get sued over this.


oh my god another one.


you lost respect for apple because they decided to release slightly higher specs in some boxes in order to drive inventory.


o.k.
 
beatle888 said:
oh my god another one.


you lost respect for apple because they decided to release slightly higher specs in some boxes in order to drive inventory.


o.k.


Quit being such a smarmy little bastard. I'm supposed to order one not knowing what I'll get? Gee, I think I'll go out and buy a new car not knowing what kind of engine it will come with. What a great idea.
 
budugu said:
CAN APPLE BE ANY MORE F***ING CHEAPER? Just donot send out the new ones untill you are done with your inventory. I cannot believe that they are this much retarded. Is this a form of playing a lottery? I think just to f*** with them people should not buy the product till they come out and post the darn update! :mad: :mad:

How long have you folks been using computers? This was common practice for years in the PC world. We would very routinely order 100s of PCs at a time for rollouts and some would arrive with tweeks and minor upgrades. At least on a Mac the changes won't send you searching through boxes looking for driver revisions.

I can't get over reading this thread how many people treat the mini as some high end machine and act like Apple is holding out on them. Would you be upset to buy a $399 Dell from your Sunday Best Buy ad and find out the box next to it had some minor difference? Who cares. Its a CHEAP consumer level machine. Its not a PowerMac. Its not even an iBook. Some of you should quit your analysis of every spec of the mini and just take it for what it is - the bottom of the line Apple made for homework, iTunes and email.
 
1984 said:
Quit being such a smarmy little bastard. I'm supposed to order one not knowing what I'll get? Gee, I think I'll go out and buy a new car not knowing what kind of engine it will come with. What a great idea.


are you in the market for a mini? would you buy a mini with the specs listed on the box? if not then DONT, if yes then DO IT.

how could such a simple decision throw you into confusion. i'll try to say it another way. if your willing to buy a mini with the specs on the box then do it and DONT EXPECT the increased specs that some are getting.

see how easy that is. thats all i have to say about it. if you cant see how simple that solves the issue then i really dont have anything more to say to you. besides why would you wanna correspond with such a smarmy BIG bastard like me?
 
While the updates might not be considered major they are not exactly minor either. 64MB of video memory will help greatly with high resolution displays and a 5400rpm hard drive will allow you to run GarageBand without stuttering. Bluetooth wireless has been improved and the CPU speeds have been bumped a little too. I've never seen this many changes go undocumented in the PC world, maybe a small last minute revision here and there but not a whole bunch all at once.

Imagine going to the car dealer and being told...

"Well, for $25,000 you'll either get a 170HP engine or a 100HP engine, leather seats or cloth seats, sunroof or no sunroof... we can't tell you though. You just have to take your chances."

If they have excess inventory they either need to hold off on the new configurations or lower the prices on the previous models.

The new specs are all out in the open now and I cannot imagine anyone who needs the extra video memory or faster hard drives to take the chance of buying one not knowing whether or not they'll actually get them. This is not insignificant to those in the market for a Mac mini. Not everyone sees it as a cheap expenditure or something they can simply toy around with. I think a lot of "power" users here forget that.

Apple really screwed this one up.
 
MacTruck said:
I don't see what good this update does for anyone. What does 64mb vram do that 32mb does not?

Well, gaming should be faster now. Also, 32MB resulted in choppy Expose in higher resolutions, this upgrade should fix that.

and 80mhz speed bump is not noticable at all.

Well, you get that extra 80MHz for free, so I fail to see the problem here.

Lets see faster hard drives

IIRC, this upgrade includes faster hard-drives.

a radeon 9600 card

Remember: we are talking about the cheapest Mac available. You are basically demanding features and specs that exist in more expensive models on their cheapest computer.

and at least 1.67ghz speed.

"At least"? You aren't demanding much, considering that the G4 maxes out at 1.67GHz! Seriously, the CPU is fast enough. I have the 1.25 GHz model, and it has plenty of horsepower for the intended uses of the machine. If you want more power to run some pro-apps, Apple has some other computers for sale for that purpose.

Again: this is the cheapest Mac available. It would be ludicrous to demand high specs from this machine. You could say that you get what you pay for.

The biggest problem with the mini is the dang hard drives 4200 rpm speed.

Well, this update fixes that problem, improves other specs as well, without increasing the prices. So the problem is..... what, exactly? You get more computer for the same amount of money, and you complain?
 
lickily said:
WTF? FU Apple. If this is what is meant by gradual, stealth updates, I prefer the old system. Hide the spec change from the public just so they can charge restocking fees for those who get older models? I can see why they canceled the test drive program now. Looks like I'll be buying from Best Buy or somewhere else where I can return my mini if I get last month's model.

You are buying a 1.42GHz machine with 32MB of VRAM. With little luck, you might get a machine that exceeds those specs, without paying a dime more. So what is the problem here? "But I wanna the new model!". Sorry, they promise you the machine that they have written on the specs. That is the machine you are paying for. If you are lucky, you might get a better machine for the same amount of money. You could say that some people are getting a free gift from Apple, and still people complain and whine?
 
1984 said:
While the updates might not be considered major they are not exactly minor either. 64MB of video memory will help greatly with high resolution displays and a 5400rpm hard drive will allow you to run GarageBand without stuttering. Bluetooth wireless has been improved and the CPU speeds have been bumped a little too. I've never seen this many changes go undocumented in the PC world, maybe a small last minute revision here and there but not a whole bunch all at once.

Imagine going to the car dealer and being told...

"Well, for $25,000 you'll either get a 170HP engine or a 100HP engine, leather seats or cloth seats, sunroof or no sunroof... we can't tell you though. You just have to take your chances."

If they have excess inventory they either need to hold off on the new configurations or lower the prices on the previous models.

The new specs are all out in the open now and I cannot imagine anyone who needs the extra video memory or faster hard drives to take the chance of buying one not knowing whether or not they'll actually get them. This is not insignificant to those in the market for a Mac mini. Not everyone sees it as a cheap expenditure or something they can simply toy around with. I think a lot of "power" users here forget that.

Apple really screwed this one up.


Can you quit with these poor car analogies.
170HP or 100HP engine?? Is the revised mini 70% faster then the old??? No, it's about 6% :confused:
Sunroofs, Leather seats :confused: In a bottom-of-the-range car :confused:
If anything you can use the analogy that you will be getting 4 cup-holders instead of 2 :D

Anybody who orders a mini with the current specs cannot be peeved if thats what they get. Apple is using it as an incentive to ship out the last stock- that's all, no conspiracy, move on, nothing to see here.

Worst case scenario you have to wait 1 week until the are fully released.
 
1984 said:
Quit being such a smarmy little bastard. I'm supposed to order one not knowing what I'll get? Gee, I think I'll go out and buy a new car not knowing what kind of engine it will come with. What a great idea.

You are quaranteed that you will get the machine you are buying. As in: the machine that is listed in the specs! THAT is the machine you are buying and paying for. You MIGHT get a better machine for same amount of money. Why is that a problem? More computer for same amount of money, but you whine? You get a better computer for same amount of money, and you whine?

If you want to get the new machine with 100% certainity, wait for a while, untill they officially improve the specs!

To use the car-analogy: you decide to buy a car with certain specs. Then when they deliver the car to you, the salesperson tells you that "they ran out of the cars you ordered, so we decided to give you a slightly better model instead. This model has all the features you ordered, but it also has navigation and Xenon-headlights. The price is the same, however". What is the problem?

Sheesh, some people here....
 
brother said:
I'm the one who submitted the rumor. Posted at macnn.com forums as well. The box lists the machine as a 1.42 Ghz, so this is either a *very* quite rollout or a fortunate screw-up for my co-worker. This machine was actually received last week, but I wasn't able to set it up until today. Here are the screens:


Guys guys, calm down i know this is macrumors but it doesnt mean that we must believe everything especially when things dont sound like Apple -not that the Intel thing sounded like Apple- but this 1.5 thing seems hillarious. Didnt they want to advertse this change? Seems strange. Anyway well i just wanted to say that Santa yesterday dropped in early a MacMini box in my house and look what it was! A MacMini with a dual G5 2.7GHz processor...

I do not imply anything bad about "brother" i just want to make a point. Lets have our eyes open... although now that i think of it Apple can make mistakes sometimes.
 

Attachments

  • processornewFaster.jpg
    processornewFaster.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 399
c2104338 said:
Can you quit with these poor car analogies.
170HP or 100HP engine?? Is the revised mini 70% faster then the old??? No, it's about 6% :confused:

Um, since when is a 170HP engine 70% faster than a 100HP one? It's not like it makes you go from 0-60 in 3 seconds vs 10 seconds. Even a 1,000HP Bugatti takes a little more than 3 seconds. My analogy is correct.


Sunroofs, Leather seats :confused: In a bottom-of-the-range car :confused:

You can get a new car for less than $25,000 with sunroof, leather seats, etc. Just did in fact for less than $22,000. Not "bottom-of-the-range" at all. Depends on your point of view I guess.


If anything you can use the analogy that you will be getting 4 cup-holders instead of 2 :D

So you think $25,000 buys you a bottom of the barrel econobox? Like I said before, you "power" users think the Mac mini is just a toy and buying one is financially trivial. Spending $499 on a Mac mini must be the equivalent of you buying lunch or something. Nice to have money to burn.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top