I think it speaks for apple that we expect more from them, and they should be up to it. Also I think if it would be a whole team, that team still has a manager. Also sure why not fire the whole team ?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Revised macOS Big Sur 11.2.1 Update Properly Checks Free Available Space to Prevent Installation Errors
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well when you raise your own expectations you're setting yourself up for disppointment. So Apple didn't match up to your "high exceptions", are you going to switch to Windows full time now? Sounds like that's the plan since Apple can't fulfill your high exceptions.
Well it happened and it's done. If it affects your life then switch over to a Windows machine and enjoy the perfect life of Windows 10 since Microsoft is 100% mistake proof.
I don't feel as daft as your baseless criticism.
This isn't an app, it's an operating system update. It's Apple's operating system update. Microsoft doesn't distribute bundled x86 and x64 binaries of Windows. They distribute them separately. I can't imagine why Apple wouldn't do the same.
The best cable to use with Configurator is the USB-C charging cable which comes with the MacBook, as long as the host Mac has USB-C.
I don't think its actually a "high expectation" for an installer to check available and necessary disk space. On the other hand you seem to settle for below average for the sake of not being disappointed... Also demanding better from Apple, doesn't mean I need to switch.. it means I demand better from Apple.
There have been way more bugs that require you to "simply" restart your computer.. like it's a bloody Windows machine or something. They seem to think that this sort of solution is acceptable. I realize Big Sur is a pretty big change for Mac OS, so I hope it improves in the future.
Where is the big change ? They changed a couple of icons and added a new cpu architecture to support, but the latter is only a change in the compiler and leaves most devs unaffected.
You misread my post. When did I state that you're expecting too much for the installer to check available space? I never wrote such a thing. I'm saying you're expecting too much if you expect a company made up of humans to be mistake proof. Are you mistake proof? I was saying what's done is done and what's the point of the continuing trashing? Let's be real about this. I'm willing to bet less than 5 people throwing fire about this were even affected, especially since this was fixed in a week. You do realize it can only affect people installing the OS and they had to have less space available for anything to go wrong? That's not a common daily thing such as running the OS or running software. Yes the OS should check for availability of space. Obviously it's not something Apple doesn't want to happen, that's why they fixed it in less than a week since the Big Sur update that caused this.
Funny how Microsoft could easily get away with this without fixing Windows 10 until a month later and people would barely say a thing about it. 🙄
But who here is actually suggesting Apple should be mistake proof? Being that this is a thread about a shockingly basic mistake, the proposition that would seem more relevant to respond to is "Why is one of the world's most resourceful, prestigious companies making such startlingly simple, easy-to-avoid errors?"
is it just me or has Apple now changed updates, on all devices , to where you must update 'All' AND it doesn't tell you the size of the update? If this is so its a really silly and somewhat noxious change!
When upgrading to macOS Big Sur, there was an error that would cause issues if there wasn't enough storage space available. Unfortunately, the update was not checking if there was enough free space before the installation started, which could lead to data loss.
The free space issue has been addressed in a revised macOS Big Sur 11.2.1 update that was released this morning. According to Mr. Macintosh, the new update checks to make sure there is enough available storage space before installation starts.
If you don't have enough free space, the installer will say "There is not enough free space on the selected volume to upgrade the OS," and it will let you know how much additional space is required.
The new update that was released today is available only if you had not previously installed macOS Big Sur 11.2.1.
Article Link: Revised macOS Big Sur 11.2.1 Update Properly Checks Free Available Space to Prevent Installation Errors
No, I didn't. It's fallacious to take people's discontent over a subset of errors, and then use that to suggest that said people have a problem with errors in general. They don't. They have a problem with a subset of errors.
What has MS to do with this ? Also being an Apple forum naturally we speak about Apple - their achievements and also mistakes. Also when did MS make such a mistake of not checking install size ? You might bring in reference as you talk about MS all the time.
Finally we talk not one person doing a mistake. We talk about a team of developers letting that slip (Apple used to have 2 devs working on the same code to cross check each other in the past but I think they changed that). In addition they should have a standard package which appears not been used.
Also we talk about QA team letting that slip as well.
Yeah... It's pretty inexcusable that the installer didn't verify there was sufficient space before trying to do the upgrade -- but for some reason, sloppy code like this has become ALL too common. (DropBox's client is a long-time guilty party with this. It lets people try to open content shared with them even if doing so means it will run their drive almost out of space as the local copy of it downloads. They need to ensure there's some sort of margin of free space remaining, since the OS itself needs a bit of room to keep working properly.)
But Apple's ridiculous idea of selling so many devices with really small drives just makes it worse. Personally, I would never buy ANY laptop with non-removable/upgradable storage unless it had at least 512GB to 1TB of capacity. Yet Apple kept encouraging the purchase of the smaller capacity drives, and price gouging the people who did want custom configurations with larger sized ones -- claiming "People don't need to save much locally anymore, with everything going to the cloud."
This happened to my wife's Macbook. Tried to install the update, and then just errored out midway through. She was unaware of this issue before updating, and I only found out when she asked me to play tech support after the fact.
Had to boot up her computer in Target Disk Mode and clear up some space so the install could be completed. Did a Carbon Copy Clone in the process just in case the whole thing ended up FUBAR'd.
Thankfully nothing seemed affected in the process. Made sure to do a Time Machine backup afterwards just in case.
Had to boot up her computer in Target Disk Mode and clear up some space so the install could be completed. Did a Carbon Copy Clone in the process just in case the whole thing ended up FUBAR'd.
Thankfully nothing seemed affected in the process. Made sure to do a Time Machine backup afterwards just in case.
Last edited:
I think the news article is about installing the OS (upgrading from Catalina to Big Sur) and the system not checking for appropriate storage, not about installing software updates. The system requires 36GB of available space for the OS to install or it doesn't happen resulting is possible data loss. When upgrading the OS it has to set aside the System folder and remove the old OS (Catalina or earlier) and install the new one (Big Sur). Data loss resulted from not checking if the 36GB minimum was met. Software updates to the OS are not what this issue is about.
Oh I wish it was that easy. Both my MacBook Pro and iMac a few years old and pre USB-C. Everything I've read so far says Thunderbolt 2 is the only way to go.
...darn you Apple for making computers that last forever...
Configurator will absolutely not work with true Thunderbolt cables so you would need to use a USB-A to USB-C cable. This is clearly spelled out in Apple's documentation:
For Apple Silicon computers: https://support.apple.com/guide/app...ore-a-mac-with-apple-silicon-apdd5f3c75ad/mac
For Intel computers: https://support.apple.com/guide/app...r-restore-an-intel-based-mac-apdebea5be51/mac