It's definitely a busy page...but I use Click4Flash with Safari and on my 2011, early 2.2/8GB 17" MBP...I'm experiencing the same as the folks with the rMBPs. Only in Safari. Seems decent in Chrome...even 'zoomed' in via the trackpad. Obviously...the fluency of zooming with the TP in Chrome is now where near as beautiful as in Safari...is that related to this issue?
That's a Crazy page though...I think Where is it and font9a are correct. The blame lies with Techcrunch...that's an incredibly 'dynamic' page you linked. LOL...I surf quite a bit and I've never seen that!!! Fortunately this isn't commonplace for you rMBP owners, is it? I've been seriously considering one myself...possibly around the holidays.
One question though...why does it run so much better on Chrome than Safari? Why doesn't Safari call for the AMD or nVidia GPU when it's burdened with a page this cumbersome? I use gfxCardStatus...and turned my 6750 on, went to the page and I still get the same 'jerkiness' as using the integrated card. Doesn't seem to change anything.
There is something to be said though for simplicity in design
...especially when it comes to a site or blog or review...meant for 'Reading!'. Less distraction and clutter seems to be common sense. Guess Not!
J
That's a Crazy page though...I think Where is it and font9a are correct. The blame lies with Techcrunch...that's an incredibly 'dynamic' page you linked. LOL...I surf quite a bit and I've never seen that!!! Fortunately this isn't commonplace for you rMBP owners, is it? I've been seriously considering one myself...possibly around the holidays.
One question though...why does it run so much better on Chrome than Safari? Why doesn't Safari call for the AMD or nVidia GPU when it's burdened with a page this cumbersome? I use gfxCardStatus...and turned my 6750 on, went to the page and I still get the same 'jerkiness' as using the integrated card. Doesn't seem to change anything.
There is something to be said though for simplicity in design
J