rMBP Processor Inquiry

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by mattxi, Dec 11, 2012.

  1. mattxi macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, RU and Minnesota, US
    #1
    Hey all,

    About to decide on an rMBP within the week. I do a lot of video editing, compositing, 3D work, scoring, etc. The stock processor is 2.6GHz i7 (3.6GHz boost), is it worth $250 to get the 2.7GHz i7 (3.7GHz boost)?

    Will there be a noticeable difference?
     
  2. bill-p macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    #2
    Nope. I'd recommend that you get more RAM rather than a faster CPU.
     
  3. Orlandoech macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #3
    ^^^ What he said.

    2.3 w/ 16GB or 2.6 w/ 16GB. Cost:Value, definitely the 2.3 w/ 16GB.
     
  4. mattxi thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, RU and Minnesota, US
    #4
    I'm for sure doing 16gb ram, but you wouldn't suggest upgrading from 2.6 to 2.7?
     
  5. bill-p macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    #5
    Nope. The performance improvement going from 2.3 to 2.6 isn't that great. Going from 2.6 to 2.7 would be minimal at best.

    I'd think that the 2.7 option is only there for those who want the absolutely best performance out of their machine at this time even if it's minuscule.

    Of course, if you have the cash to burn, then by all means, go for it, but the difference is very minimal.
     
  6. Orlandoech macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #6
    I wouldn't even recommend upgrading to the 2.6 from the 2.3, the $100 isnt worth 300MHz and benchmark bragging rights. The real world performance difference will be insignificant and any decoding/encoding will only get marginally faster.

    I think the best setup is 2.3/16/256 or 2.3/16/512. If the $100 isn't anything to you, then opt for the 2.6. I myself, would rather spend the $100 on a nice 7200RPM USB3 HDD.
     
  7. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #7
    With the faster CPU you might save few minutes per day at max. Is it worth you $250?
     
  8. mattxi thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, RU and Minnesota, US
    #8
    Thank you all for your input! I'll probably stick with the 2.6, which is what I was originally going for.
     
  9. xxcysxx macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
    #9
    If you want the absolute best CPU for a mobile laptop then that would be the 3940xm speaking as of today. Apple doesn't offer it because of cost reasons and chances are their system can't handle the thermal output. One step below that would be the 3840qm, which is likely going to be on the next refresh if there is one due soon. The 3820qm is the former version of the 3840qm, which is the top of the line processor your speaking of for the fifteen inch retina.

    you are not going to see or benifit the fullest performance potential of the 3820qm on the retina machine for day to day task because the graphic scaling tax away some of that processing horsepower. Though, I'm not sure about the comparable fifteen inch classic since it doesn't do graphic scaling. But you'll be paying more for a comparable fifteen inch classic vs its retina counterpart.
     
  10. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #10
    max TDP suggests that only 3840QM is possible, but it offers only but a marginal speed bump (100mhz) compared to the top model.
    Perhaps this + GT660M instead of 650M is a feasible january refresh before haswell overhaul in spring
     
  11. xxcysxx, Dec 11, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2012

    xxcysxx macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
    #11
    well, 3840qm and 3940xm have the same thermal output, 55 watts. and beside the difference of 100mhz, its also has an unlock multiplier, for over-clocking.:D, an $850 price tag, and also some other brag rights. :p

    hopefully, on the next refresh, if they decide to update the video card, they wouldn't have to overclock it, which will equates to a "slightly" more efficient system.
     
  12. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #12
  13. xxcysxx macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2011
  14. DeusInvictus7 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2008
    Location:
    Kitchener, Ontario
    #14
    I agree with others on this thread, the 2.7GHz is not worth it. For most people, even the 2.6GHz isn't going to be noticeable. Personally I did go for the 2.6GHz, but really only because I get a decent discount from work so the cost was pretty minimal. The best configuration in my opinion is either the 2.6GHz/16GB/256GB or the 2.6GHz/16GB/512GB depending on onboard storage needs. If you don't do anything really processor intensive, then the 2.3GHz versions of above are really good too.
     
  15. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #15
    That's good though, 3840qm got out after Retina... so it's kinda possible that they'll replace the chip in January.
    If that's the case I'd rather wait, i know what everybody is saying, but there has been too many moments when I wished I'd go with 2.8ghz 4 years ago when I bought my first (and first in general) unibody - 2.53ghz
     
  16. chevalier433 macrumors 6502a

    chevalier433

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    #16
    As an video editor myself I say definitely you will need every available hardware possible.Memory can add later.
     
  17. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #17
    You can't add memory with the retina MBP.
     
  18. chevalier433 macrumors 6502a

    chevalier433

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    #18
    You are right SSD is upgradable from OWC.
     
  19. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #19
    They want $579.99 for a 480Gb SSD while the Apple 512Gb costs $500. Wouldn't exactly call it a smart way to upgrade. But yeah, there is a possibility.
     
  20. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #20
    You get to keep the 256GB flash and there's an external USB3.0 enclosure for it. It's supposedly a bit faster as well.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/OWC_Envoy_Pro/

    If you ask me it's a pretty good deal, if you're in the shop for the 2.3 model.
     
  21. Mr MM macrumors 65816

    Mr MM

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    #21
    its not a good deal, nor its faster. its best to order a ssd from ifixit, much better prices
     
  22. mattxi thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, RU and Minnesota, US
    #22
    This has strayed a little bit from the original topic--SSD stays at 512, not gonna worry about upgrading it or anything.

    It seems as though most are in agreement that 2.7 isn't worth $250, but I do want to stick with 2.6 since the work I do is processor intensive.

    Here it is:
    rMBP 15"
    2.6GHz i7
    16gb RAM
    512gb SSD


    Seems like it'll do the job.
     
  23. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #23
    diglloyd (macperformanceguide) said that the speed is better, albeit marginally. Also, iFixit is completely out of stock on Retina drives.
     
  24. MCAsan macrumors 601

    MCAsan

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #24
    As someone who owns and uses a maxed out rMBP...go for the 2.7 and 16GB. It is the SSD size that adds killer costs. SSD size relates to how much you need data you need to collect or carry inside the machine. I doubt most people need the 756GB. I got it for collecting photos during multiple week photo trips. The edited files are moved to external thunderbolt drives.

    I plan to keep the machine for at least the 3 years of Apple Care. So I am not buying a machine for today; I am buying one to last at least 3 years with unknown processing requirements from OS or apps in the future.
     
  25. Ploki macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    #25

Share This Page