11 Pages and i didn't see a single mention of MBSFN part of the LTE spec. (Even thread search didn't find it). That would be a really obvious reason they would be talking to these companies. TV becomes the single Internet access point for your house bypass cable companies.
But wouldn't you be replacing the cable company middlemen with the likes of AT&T, Verizon, Sprint? One devil replaced by another devil is not necessarily better. I don't think anyone hates the physical cables- just the monthly bill. If AT&T, Verizon, Sprint becomes the new cable company, I doubt anyone's monthly bill will get any better.
And again, why do you need a whole new television for that? Why not just build that into anTV3 if Apple wants to work with existing partners to bypass the cable/satt players?
One big area of concern.
I don't use a remote to tune my TV.
I tune my cable box, which feeds into my A/V receiver, which then displays the content on my TV as a monitor. And the sound goes from the receiver to the 5 speakers.
So how will an Apple TV work in an A/V receiver situation? Hopefully some sort of dolby capable "pre-out"?
DOUGLAS ADAMS!
For those of you familiar with the Hitchhikers Guide, there is a bit where they're in their fancy spaceship, and he's talking about listening to the radio. He describes how at first radios had control buttons, then surfaces that detected touch. Eventually radios detected motion without touch, which meant that you had to sit annoyingly still to avoid changing the channel.
Douglas Adams wrote this in the seventies.
Thanks for the reminder!