Roku CEO Talks About Apple TV+ Going Cross-Platform

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
7,458
8,522



Apple yesterday shared plans to bring its Apple TV app to multiple smart TVs and third-party set-top boxes, including the Amazon Fire TV and Roku. The TV app will house Apple TV+, Apple's upcoming streaming service for its original content when it launches later this year.

Following Apple's announcement, Roku CEO Anthony Wood spoke to CNBC about Apple's decision to expand access to the TV app, expressing excitement that the content will be available on Roku devices.


Wood believes that Apple is "well-positioned" to be successful in the TV streaming market, despite its competitiveness, due to the company's large user base.
There were not a lot of details announced, but I think they're well-positioned to be successful. They've got a lot of experience with subscription services, they're investing a lot of money in content, and they've got a great brand and lots of loyal customers.
Wood went on to say that while Apple is counting on its iOS and macOS devices to "jumpstart" Apple TV+, the importance of smart TVs should not be ignored.
When you have a TV streaming service, you know, obviously they're counting on jumpstarting that with all of their iPhone and iPad and Mac customers, but actually, smart TVs are the way that most streaming services - long form streaming services - are viewed by customers. That's where they spend most of their hours.
Roku, says Wood, is the leading streaming TV platform, and if Apple wants to be successful, Apple needs to be on Roku and other similar platforms.
For any kind of service like that to be successful, you want to be on the leading streaming TV platforms and Roku is the leading streaming TV platform. We're the leading distributor of streaming content in the U.S.
According to Wood, there are no real negatives to Apple entering the streaming market for Roku because Roku supports all streaming services to offer its customers choice. Roku isn't betting on any one company to come out ahead in the streaming market because Roku "works with everyone" and benefits from a large amount of content being available.

Apple TV+ will launch in the fall, but ahead of its debut, the newly revamped TV app will become available in May. Apple plans to bring the TV app to multiple third-party platforms, starting with Samsung Smart TVs. Later in the year, it will expand to Amazon Fire TV devices, Roku devices, and smart TVs from Sony, LG, and Vizio.

Article Link: Roku CEO Talks About Apple TV+ Going Cross-Platform
 

penx

macrumors newbie
May 23, 2005
27
1
> Roku "works with everyone"

Not quite. It doesn’t work with Sky Go, which is the only way to get HBO shows in HD in the UK. Hopefully Apple will help change that...
 
  • Like
Reactions: martyjmclean

fhopper

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2007
111
46
Wichita Ks.
I want my Smart TVs to play the movies I own in iTunes. I want my Stupid TVs to play the movies I own in iTunes through all my streaming devices. I do not want my phone to be involved in watching the movies I own on iTunes.
 

now i see it

macrumors 601
Jan 2, 2002
4,033
8,025
so much hoopla about tv shows. I thought the smart thing to do was NOT watch tv. Rots the brain & all that
 

magicschoolbus

macrumors 65816
May 27, 2014
1,467
5,041
How does Apple have a lot of experience in the subscription service business? Other then iCloud, what subscriptions have they really been selling?
 

Romeo_Nightfall

macrumors 6502a
Aug 8, 2018
534
586
Vienna
With so many video streaming services all demanding subscriptions it's no wonder torrents are becoming more popular again unfortunately.

Shame video wouldn't follow the music model of multiple audio streaming companies able to provide about the same content.
A matter of time ... and consumer consequence
 

w5jck

macrumors regular
Nov 9, 2013
160
228
"Wood believes that Apple is "well-positioned" to be successful in the TV streaming market, despite its competitiveness, due to the company's large user base.

'There were not a lot of details announced, but I think they're well-positioned to be successful. They've got a lot of experience with subscription services, they're investing a lot of money in content, and they've got a great brand and lots of loyal customers
.'"

I think Wood and Apple and a lot of others are greatly over-estimating the loyalty of longtime customers. I have been using Apple devices since 1981, which is more years than a large percentage of MacRumors members have been alive. I like my Apple devices, but I think Apple services blow big chunks. And judging by the posts I've read in many forums in the past few years, including this one, there are a lot of us so-called loyal Apple customers who hate Apple services but like Apple hardware. I have never liked any of Apple's services, and other than an occasional free trial have never used them long enough to pay a subscription. From what I saw yesterday, Apple just piddled all over itself with their services event. Apple was not prepared to make half of them available yet, nor did they give many details, and that suggests to me they are very clueless and ill prepared for those services. The two services that were made available both are extremely underwhelming. Financial experts are saying  Card is nothing special as has already been done by many companies like Amazon. Apple made no attempt to even compete in rewards with other companies. And from what I've seen trying to use the  New+ service it truly blows chunks. Why mix magazines in with news articles? Why use a clunky, crappy interface? What did they do with News Stand? It would have been a better interface than displaying scanned images of magazines like Smithsonian which have zero text formatting options, and magazines like National Geographic which does have a very few text formatting options but still looks bad in the News app interface. Meh... There is no way in hell I will pay for any of their services as long as they suck that bad. I will keep buying Apple devices as long as I can afford to, I have a new iPhone XR arriving today, but their services are over priced and not competitive enough to make me spend a single penny on any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fhopper

smulji

macrumors 6502a
Feb 21, 2011
982
519
so much hoopla about tv shows. I thought the smart thing to do was NOT watch tv. Rots the brain & all that
It is. Given the obesity epidemic and rapid increase in type 2 diabetes, not just in the US but worldwide, you would think people would get that
[doublepost=1553622122][/doublepost]
How does Apple have a lot of experience in the subscription service business? Other then iCloud, what subscriptions have they really been selling?
Apple Music, which has 50 million paid subscribers
 
Last edited:

Braderunner

macrumors 6502a
Oct 2, 2015
888
1,684
Tralfamadore
Why do you watch it? Or why don’t you stop watching at some point?
You seem to have a very limited amount of time and could easily just wait until the recap video the next day.
Just a tip.
I had the time. o_O I didn't know that I'd be left with even more questions than answers. :confused:
 

smulji

macrumors 6502a
Feb 21, 2011
982
519
"Wood believes that Apple is "well-positioned" to be successful in the TV streaming market, despite its competitiveness, due to the company's large user base.

'There were not a lot of details announced, but I think they're well-positioned to be successful. They've got a lot of experience with subscription services, they're investing a lot of money in content, and they've got a great brand and lots of loyal customers
.'"

I think Wood and Apple and a lot of others are greatly over-estimating the loyalty of longtime customers. I have been using Apple devices since 1981, which is more years than a large percentage of MacRumors members have been alive. I like my Apple devices, but I think Apple services blow big chunks. And judging by the posts I've read in many forums in the past few years, including this one, there are a lot of us so-called loyal Apple customers who hate Apple services but like Apple hardware. I have never liked any of Apple's services, and other than an occasional free trial have never used them long enough to pay a subscription. From what I saw yesterday, Apple just piddled all over itself with their services event. Apple was not prepared to make half of them available yet, nor did they give many details, and that suggests to me they are very clueless and ill prepared for those services. The two services that were made available both are extremely underwhelming. Financial experts are saying  Card is nothing special as has already been done by many companies like Amazon. Apple made no attempt to even compete in rewards with other companies. And from what I've seen trying to use the  New+ service it truly blows chunks. Why mix magazines in with news articles? Why use a clunky, crappy interface. What did they do with News Stand. It would have been a better interface than displaying scanned images of magazines like Smithsonian which have zero text formatting options, and magazines like National Geographic which does have a very few text formatting options but still looks bad in the News app interface. Meh... There is no way in hell I will pay for any of their services as long as they suck that bad. I will keep buying Apple devices as long as I can afford to, I have a new iPhone XR arriving today, but their services are over priced and not competitive enough to make me spend a single penny on any of them.
Once upon a time those same financial experts said Apple should not have entered brick-and-mortal retail and now they are the most profitable retailer (on a per square foot basis) globally. Those same financial experts also said the iPod would fail when it was first announced because Apple was late to the digital music segment and was proprietary. They also said iPhone would fail because it had no hardware keyboard and they offered nothing compelling over Blackberry & Nokia. Need I go on?
 

_Dubs_

macrumors newbie
Sep 10, 2015
8
4
So will I be able to watch my iTunes movies / shows via the Apple TV app on these devices? I have an Apple TV for my tv’s so it’s no big deal, but it would be nice to have that option, especially for someone like my mom who doesn’t have an Apple TV but does have a roku.
 
  • Like
Reactions: enc0re and tallii4

tallii4

macrumors newbie
Apr 5, 2017
27
53
Once upon a time those same financial experts said Apple should not have entered brick-and-mortal retail and now they are the most profitable retailer (on a per square foot basis) globally. Those same financial experts also said the iPod would fail when it was first announced because Apple was late to the digital music segment and was proprietary. They also said iPhone would fail because it had no hardware keyboard and they offered nothing compelling over Blackberry & Nokia. Need I go on?
Its amazing we still call these people experts!