Apple depreciated 32 bit apps for over a decade and fully discontinued being able to run them on OS10.15 at the end of last year. Here's an article about it.
They really need to start publishing a list of major developers who are offering dual binary support along with a list of applications working within their Rosetta V2 platform.
They really need to start publishing a list of major developers who are offering dual binary support along with a list of applications working within their Rosetta V2 platform.
They really need to start publishing a list of major developers who are offering dual binary support along with a list of applications working within their Rosetta V2 platform.
They really need to start publishing a list of major developers who are offering dual binary support along with a list of applications working within their Rosetta V2 platform.
64-bit only. As others have stated, you're not going to have Catalina drop support for 32-bit Intel binaries only to have Rosetta 2 re-introduce said support. I'm pretty sure this was all a part of the plan and that, as a result, more things will work in Rosetta 2 than did in its PowerPC-to-Intel predecessor.
They really need to start publishing a list of major developers who are offering dual binary support along with a list of applications working within their Rosetta V2 platform.
Considering how closely timed this was with Apple dropping support for 32-bit Intel applications, it's very likely that most 64-bit Intel applications (obviously excluding Intel native versions of Parallels, Fusion, and VirtualBox) will just work and that such a list won't be necessary.