Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm sure I'm stupid and not understanding, but I thought orders were off, component suppliers were down, etc so how/why is it that analysts expectations seem to align with Apple's expectations for the quarter?

Since all they can do is guess and 41-43 are the only numbers from someone in the know, that's a clever thing to do.
Then generate some random number in between so everybody believes you might actually know something.
 
Last quarters, the stock didn't drop because revenues didn't grow, it dropped because the growth of revenues didn't grow. They expect Apple's revenues to grow exponentially since that's what we've been accustomed to in recent years.

Even if Apple has, by a large margin, the highest profit share in 3 of the most profitable industries on earth (computers, smartphones and tablets), they're expected to continue growing very fast by introducing new super-profitable categories and again, grabbing most of their profits while said categories grow exponentially. All that without losing profit share in past categories while they also continue to grow. Easy task eh?

Meanwhile, companies like Amazon see their stock going up while they report no profit at all.

Grows or not, how much the grow, all of these are just some factors for the calculation. The real thing matters is the projected earnings for 3 or 5 years later. Amazon stock went up because it is projected to dominate an industry thus a somehow warranted future profit. The similar applies to Google.

Apple is totally the opposite story, since it is projected to continuously struggle at a low market share of everything it participates with thus unpredictable future profit level, which definitely cannot support its original super-high stock price. The so-called “price drop” is simply a correction (maybe a little over-reacted by now) from a previous overly-optimistic price.
 
I'm sure I'm stupid and not understanding, but I thought orders were off, component suppliers were down, etc so how/why is it that analysts expectations seem to align with Apple's expectations for the quarter?

Apple traditionally low-balls guidance. This means Apple's internal projections are also higher than official guidance (just like the analysts). This in turn means Apple does procurement for its internal estimates, not the formal guidance.

So it all is, in fact, consistent.
 
My guess. "Record profits. Slowing Mac sales but iPhone and iPad sold a bajillion units"

Stock market response: "we are lowering your value"
 
My guess. "Record profits. Slowing Mac sales but iPhone and iPad sold a bajillion units"

Stock market response: "we are lowering your value"

just like last time. and the time before that. and the time before that...
 
Apple is totally the opposite story, since it is projected to continuously struggle at a low market share of everything it participates with thus unpredictable future profit level, which definitely cannot support its original super-high stock price. The so-called “price drop” is simply a correction (maybe a little over-reacted by now) from a previous overly-optimistic price.

I guess it really depends on if you agree with this projection or not. I personally think it's overly pessimistic. I think your market share getting lower doesn't matter if you profit share remains the same yet your sales are growing exponentially.

Market share is very dependant on the size of the industry, and as it is, the industry is mostly expanding so fast because of low-profit products, some of which actually make competitors struggle to even achieve profitability. Signs of a decreasing profit share in an industry that's not expected to grow would be a bad sign, but it's not the case.

Right now, Apple keeping its profit share while losing market share means competitors are just lowering their profit margins. Most do just to stay relevant in this competitive market. Just the fact that they do shows Apple is far from doomed. It's not like selling your devices nearly at cost just so that Apple doesn't get an monopoly is their ideal plan.
 
Last edited:
Apple traditionally low-balls guidance. This means Apple's internal projections are also higher than official guidance (just like the analysts). This in turn means Apple does procurement for its internal estimates, not the formal guidance.

So it all is, in fact, consistent.

The affiliated analysts are conservative. It is not difficult to figure out why. The markets know the analysts are conservative (and that companies tend to guide even more conservatively). So this is why beating guidance is essential (it is the lowest bar), and beating guidance but failing beat the Street is still treated by the markets as a miss. Stock trading reacts accordingly.

Before anyone says this only happens to AAPL, this is not true. Just last week, for example, GE met Street expectations but fell 4%.
 
You don't seem to understand investors. They are not fan boys. They invest their money in hopes it will grow, not stagnate. So just because Apple makes billions if it's not making billions more quarter over quarter, i.e., growing, that's NOT a good thing.

Perpetual Exponential growth is not possible. Apple grew revenue last qtr, but didn't grow how analysts expected. There's a difference between stagnating and someone throwing out an arbitrary number and saying "you have stagnated" if you don't meet that number.

When apple actually stagnates that's when anything these "analysts" say can make any sense.
 
do you really want your shiny new devices to look dated so soon?

Doesn't bother me at all, I want to see some new products so I can buy them. Ready to buy two new Thunderbolt Displays as soon as they release them..
 
just like last time. and the time before that. and the time before that...

Actually, not. Even the best case scenario has Apple earning less this quarter than in the same quarter a year ago. We haven't see this happen in about ten years.

----------

Perpetual Exponential growth is not possible. Apple grew revenue last qtr, but didn't grow how analysts expected. There's a difference between stagnating and someone throwing out an arbitrary number and saying "you have stagnated" if you don't meet that number.

When apple actually stagnates that's when anything these "analysts" say can make any sense.

Declining earnings is stagnating.
 
Thats nice and all.. but when is WWDC 2013?! I want to have something to look forward to :(

Yeah i think whe all excited to see iOS 7 and maybe some new product; time is going really so cant complaint whe just need to wait a bit more.
 
Yeah. Everyone in the world could buy everything they would need EVER, EVERYDAY And Amazin wouldn't make more than 10 billion dollars per quarter. The reason why is amazons net margin - 0.8%. They make NOTHING. it's all "SOMEDAY" we'll raise margins. It's a rediculous notion, and the stock will suffer in the next 5 years if they keep it up.

And the consumer will benefit with better prices.
 
Declining earnings is stagnating.

yes and that hasn't happened yet. Like I said, if apple declines then we can talk about it.




Exactly, so why do you want this particular company's (which has significantly slowing growth) stock to be priced as if it is?

I don't. I think the stock is priced just right. What's ridiculous is the stock tumbling because some "analyst"said it should grow exponentially, when it can't.
 
Stocks are priced based on earnings estimates 2 years out

Which is why the 2pm PST conference call is just as important as the 1pm PST earnings report.

Conference call should be interesting. Tim Cook is going to get drilled on future products and if he pulls the norm and says "Great stuff in the pipeline". Watch the after hours stock price drop significantly.
 
do you really want your shiny new devices to look dated so soon?

I realize you were probably kidding, but it does go the other way too. People get mad at Apple every time they announce or update anything. They get mad when they don't announce something at the exact same time they did last year. They might as well just ignore the whiners and keep doing what they're doing.
 
Like he said... no company can grow forever.

So where do we go from here?

Sure, a company can grow as close to "forever" as realistically matters. The question is at what rate. At 20-30% a year as Apple had been growing? Probably not. But 10% a year is not out of the question, if the new products keep coming.

yes and that hasn't happened yet. Like I said, if apple declines then we can talk about it.

Yes, it has happened, you are just in denial about it. Nobody is forecasting YoY growth, and even if by some miracle they managed to squeak out more a few pennies more in EPS this year compared to last, the margin would be too small to really matter.

Stocks are priced based on earnings estimates 2 years out

Not really. The markets are looking 3-6 months down the road. One or two quarters, at most. As an investor you would do well to look beyond that horizon, but you will have to accept that the markets are not pricing the stock for the long term.

----------

I don't. I think the stock is priced just right. What's ridiculous is the stock tumbling because some "analyst"said it should grow exponentially, when it can't.

Stocks are always priced "just right," by definition. As for the other part, you just don't get it at all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.