My statements were made in sarcasm.
Microsoft had to outsource production, they don't actually have any of their own hardware. 😉
(unless you count their newly formed chip division)
I was merely pointing out the fact that Microsoft for the most part(99.99%) is a software company not a hardware company.
They'll support any hardware that will help increase a products availability.(like windows supporting Blu-Ray drives)
Sony,
The goal was 6 million and they shipped 5.5, thats not bad at all.
(considering the $600/PS3 price tag)
Oh and btw - worldwide software shipments for the PS3 were 13.2 million.
Considering consumers only have 3.1 million, thats a decent attachment rate, that will only improve as better games get released.
I think the anomoly in your analogy is this:
Gamecube price dropped in half, but that was from 199.99 to 99.99. It was already within reach to most consumers.
If PS3 saw a similar cut(half = 599.99 to 299.99.), we would see sales skyrocket.
Their losses were similar(respectively) for the PS2 launch.
Microsoft had to outsource production, they don't actually have any of their own hardware. 😉
(unless you count their newly formed chip division)
I was merely pointing out the fact that Microsoft for the most part(99.99%) is a software company not a hardware company.
They'll support any hardware that will help increase a products availability.(like windows supporting Blu-Ray drives)
Sony,
The goal was 6 million and they shipped 5.5, thats not bad at all.
(considering the $600/PS3 price tag)
Oh and btw - worldwide software shipments for the PS3 were 13.2 million.
Considering consumers only have 3.1 million, thats a decent attachment rate, that will only improve as better games get released.
I think the anomoly in your analogy is this:
Gamecube price dropped in half, but that was from 199.99 to 99.99. It was already within reach to most consumers.
If PS3 saw a similar cut(half = 599.99 to 299.99.), we would see sales skyrocket.
Their losses were similar(respectively) for the PS2 launch.