Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
One of the reason I wanted an iPhone was because I thought it would be good in combination with Nike+ (which I was sure would get an iPhone release). However, now that I got my iPhone, and played around with it, I realize that the device is simply too big to comfortably run around with. I'm not a small guy, about 6'5" and not exactly skinny, but I just can't see myself running around with the iPhone on my arm. Obviously the same goes for this program - which I am sure is well made, but the iPhone is just not for running in my opinion.

I'll just wait for the new iPod nano and purchase it especially as a running device.

Nike Super plus ftw... I thikn we'll be hearing more isnce they've teamed up with 24 hour Fitness - why wouldn't they or Apple want to get an app going? Couldn't the iPhone 3G also do a BT footpod if one were to come out? Still waiting about news on Ant + and HR monitors. If only they could - it'd be awesome. Till then, the Forerunner 405 seems to be winning out on useability.
 
I've posted my full review of RunKeeper:

http://podophile.com/2008/08/11/running-with-iphone-runkeeper-review/

To summarize: I love it. Accuracy was perfect and it was easy to use. Data was automatically sent from iPhone to their website... no syncing to computer required.

...And maybe I possess superhuman strength, but I don't find the iPhone 3G too bulky or heavy to run with at all. In fact, it feels much smaller and lighter than my original 2G iPod (which was smaller and lighter than the Walkman it replaced).
 
this app does look nice, but i'm waiting on nike+ compatibility

me too this lack of nike plus support is ridiculous now considering what the 3g phone is capable of, it can become a much fuller and richer and efficient app, over what the nano can do.
 
I'm really liking the idea behind this app. I'm gonna wait for some more reviews to come in and see what Apple has in store for 2.1.

Looks promising.
 
I'll be buying this for sure. I actually registered for their email updates when I heard about the development of this app. I run regularly and have been excited and anxious to use such a utility. This morning I received the email notification from them explaining RunKeeper was available and I immediately ordered an iPhone Belkin armband off eBay for about $12 new/shipped. As for the complaints about the size and weight, it's 4.7 freakin' ounces... if this is really a problem, I think you should spend less time performing cardiovascular activities and more time weight training. I've been using my iPod Classic on runs and haven't the slightest problem with the size or weight. I'm perfectly comfortable wearing it on my arm. I don't even notice it's there.
 
I have to put in a shameless plug for Path Tracker, my own GPS tracking application:

http://pathtracks.com/

Here's a path I recorded with Path Tracker a few days ago:
http://pathtracks.com/users/1/paths/1

That was a 2.5 hour, 7.5 mile walk with 970 GPS points. The tracking was very accurate.

Benefits of Path Tracker:
+ Shows your path on a map as you move if you have 3G coverage.
+ Only $0.99

I've already submitted Path Tracker version 1.2 to Apple, so it should be available in the next week or two. Path Tracker 1.2 will let you save paths to the web, export paths as KML and GPX, and has a number of other improvements over 1.1.
 
me too this lack of nike plus support is ridiculous now considering what the 3g phone is capable of, it can become a much fuller and richer and efficient app, over what the nano can do.

When the iPod touch came out I always said I'd buy it once they had a 32gb version and Nike+ compatibility. One down, one to go. I'm sure it's only a matter of time. I currently have a 30gb iPod (video) and a nano. This would mean I only need to maintain one iPod.

Of course if the iPhone was 32gb, was Nike+ compatible, and could be used with a pay-as-you-go plan, then I could also ditch my crapPhone, and I would be in heaven.... sigh.
 
I have to put in a shameless plug for Path Tracker, my own GPS tracking application:

http://pathtracks.com/

Here's a path I recorded with Path Tracker a few days ago:
http://pathtracks.com/users/1/paths/1

That was a 2.5 hour, 7.5 mile walk with 970 GPS points. The tracking was very accurate.

Benefits of Path Tracker:
+ Shows your path on a map as you move if you have 3G coverage.
+ Only $0.99

I've already submitted Path Tracker version 1.2 to Apple, so it should be available in the next week or two. Path Tracker 1.2 will let you save paths to the web, export paths as KML and GPX, and has a number of other improvements over 1.1.

Bad form, friend.

Start your own thread.
 
RunKeeper vs

I already bought Path Tracker... couldn't get the free tracker to work so well.. and figured I see how useful being able to track is with Path Tracker since it's only $.99. So far, it seems to work perfectly... and I can upload my track to a website with a click of a button. The only thing I'm missing is being able to see my top speed instead of only average speed.

What else do I get from RunKeeper that I don't get with Path Tracker? Is it worth $10 vs Path Tracker's $.99 pricing?
 
I use a program called "trackthing" it was free, it is also uses gps, it tracks distance, time , pace, avg speed, graphs that tell you where you ran the fastest and more vitals. I use my iPod in the background when I run. The program is awesome and it's free. Try it before you buy others. On a personal note I lost 60 pounds running about 60 miles a week. Took about 1500 miles.
 
I got this new one sportypal that is also free, I usually run on track and with this i can split the times for every lap. It has nice UI and many different interesting options. Reminds me on Nokissportstracker.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.