Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

joecool85

macrumors 65816
Original poster
I've heard it's possible to run windows 3.1 via DOSBox, anyone know how fast/slow it would be on my dual 2ghz G5? Also, is it possible to run win95 via DOSBox? I'll try it out as soon as I can find my win95 CD. Or win98, all I can find right now is my XP discs, and I highly doubt that would work. I might try it eventually anyway 🙂
 
Dosbox is a dos emulator, you can't install an operating system on it ...

Your best option is Parallels, next to that is Qemu, until VMware release their Mac OS X virtualization program, then it will be VMware > Parallels > Qemu.
 
The General said:
Dosbox is a dos emulator, you can't install an operating system on it ...

Your best option is Parallels, next to that is Qemu, until VMware release their Mac OS X virtualization program, then it will be VMware > Parallels > Qemu.

Actually you can. People install win 3.1 on it all the time, I just haven't done it myself yet.
 
So? Big deal its PPC. I run DOSBox on it now, why wouldn't I be able to run DOSBox and install win 3.1?
 
joecool85 said:
So? Big deal its PPC. I run DOSBox on it now, why wouldn't I be able to run DOSBox and install win 3.1?

I always thought Windows was just a program that ran in DOS like a shell anyways.
 
Spock said:
I always thought Windows was just a program that ran in DOS like a shell anyways.

Bingo, it is. I just don't know if DOSBox would be fast enough for win95 thats all.
 
joecool85 said:
Bingo, it is. I just don't know if DOSBox would be fast enough for win95 thats all.

I have never used DOSBox my self but I have a PowerBook G4 1ghz and Q runs Windows NT 4.0 really well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.