Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

eastwoodandy

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2016
131
79
Nottingham, England
Has anyone tried a workout using just the AW2 and then again with the iPhone to see if there is much difference in battery usage?

I'm stuck indoors at the moment so haven't had a chance to use any workout apps. I'm intrigued to know the difference.

My plan is to use just the AW2 when running, but I often go hiking too. The Hikes can be anywhere from 3-6 hours long, so I'm hoping the AW2 + iPhone will give me enough juice to do the whole distance with the watch.

When it's raining with low visibility, the water resistant watch will be a godsend for getting a quick bearing.
 
Here's a start, until folks can provide their first-hand experience. Apple estimates that the watch with a phone will get 8 hours for a workout. Watch with GPS (no phone) will get 5 hours for a workout.

http://www.apple.com/watch/battery.html

Thanks, that's useful. I missed the bit where they mention watch+phone= 8hrs.

Looks like this should work for me. For really long walks I'll be bringing my USB battery charger. So I could always use my phone for the workout, safely in my backpack and the watch for occasionally taking bearings.

Nothing beats a compass, map & brain, but in low visibility it gets tricky.
 
I've done work out both ways. A one hour walk for 4 miles takes about 20% using just the onboard GPS, whereas a one hour workout for 4 miles with the phone present takes only about 10% maybe 12%. So it's nearly a doubling in percentages power usage when the GPS is active on the watch only.

Appel states that using the watch for a work out with the onboard GPS should last five hours, so my real world experience is pretty much in line with apples expectation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.