Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Safari 2.0 compared to 1.3??

It thinks I'm running 1.3 which is pretty weird. I get a score of 28.82 seconds for all the tests on an 800MHz G4.
 
Did it again and got 23 seconds. Is this thing accurate? It seems a bit iffy to me, especially since it can't add up to 2.0.
 
I ran this test, got 16.96 seconds for my 12" iBook 1.2 GHz
What really impressed me was the PB user who got ~1.5 seconds.
I, for one, want to see how PMs and iMacs stack up.
 
using ff 1.0.4 i got about 30sec with my proc speed and os set accurately but when i said i had a 4ghz machine running windows xp i got 24 sec 😱
edit: emac 1.25ghz, but on most of teh tests it wasn't 100%cpu 😕
 
Tried it 4 times, twice with Airtunes running and got 35 and 36 seconds, then without Airtunes running and got 29 and 27 seconds.

iBook G4@800MHz with 640 MB RAM, running 10.4 and Safari 2.0 (after an A&I from 10.3.9)
 
I got 9.35 secs, using safari 2.0 with a 1.33GHz G4 PB with 1.5GB ram.

However it says that I'm using Safari 1.3. Weird as there is a group for Tiger.

Apparently Mozilla 1.8 and Opera 8.0 got the fastest results.
 
21.8 sec with PB 677 MHz, Safari 2.0

I suspect this site's statistics may be a bit off given it isn't grouping browsers correctly. To be honest, I was running other stuff while I did the test too (as I don't recall seeing a warning for that).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back