I'm done arguing with you. Last I knew, Safari and Firefox weren't available for System 7, so you don't have anything to worry about.
Is anybody having problems logging into MySpace on Firefox? I try to log in but then I get back to the login page.
My new imac has Safari on it. On my old P.C I used Firefox. Would it be worth using Firefox instead of Safari on my new imac?
Claiming performance without back up (which I have) is a sign of fan-boy. FireFox 2 did not re-write the rendering engine, by the way.
You are all about plug-ins. I'm obviously all about performance.
For anyone too lazy to look at that page, here is a nice graphic from it that pretty much sums-up my stance:
In all the tests, the commercial OmniWeb is the fastest yet. I personally switch between Safari, WebKit, and Camino for various reasons. Even a little IE 7 now and then for checking how it renders things. But in terms of FireFox vs Safari - Safari wins the performance test.
I could have swore I did that before! Now it's working. I feel stupid now.no, its ok here, u might want to clear cache and cookie b4 try again.
4. u are not all about any thing fair, u are biggest apple fanboy i ever know here at mr in past 5 month, I can tell this from all sorts of "apple's products are superior, firefox is crap" posts of yours. and I won't argue with you on this. good luck.
I could have swore I did that before! Now it's working. I feel stupid now.
1. performance does not exclusively equal to speed, there are websites safari can not display
2.its called extensions, not plugin, plugins are those small programs that enable content embeding inside browser, such as flash, java, media, while extensions are to extend the functionality of firefox, many functions provided by extensions maybe have nothing to do with surfing internet, such as calendar, weather forecast, altho most of them enhance browsing experience in innovative ways, such as adblock, video downloader, reveal, performancing (blogging) etc.
3. there are optimized firefox builds using osx form widget, such as http://www.beatnikpad.com/archives/2006/12/24/firefox-2001 firefox's open source natura make it possible and easy for developer to customize their idea version, the form widget isn't a big problem in any sense.
4. u are not all about any thing fair
u are biggest apple fanboy i ever know here at mr in past 5 month, I can tell this from all sorts of "apple's products are superior, firefox is crap" posts of yours. and I won't argue with you on this. good luck.
I think you raise some pretty good points there. Truth be told, I love Safari, and think it's a great browser. I also adore Firefox, thanks in large part to the Greasemonkey extension. If that thing was available for Safari, I'd be using Safari instead of Firefox...In terms of this discussion, yes it does since the distinction was made by Maxwell that there is a difference between performance and expandability. If we wanted to include website compatibility under the "performance" umbrella, Internet Explorer 7 would be the best browser in the world!
Ok, fine. "Extensions."
WebKit is open source!!! what part of that don't you understand? There is even a higher optimized WebKit browser, its OmniWeb, and it's faster than all of them! You can go right now, download all the WebKit source, modify it to your liking, and bulid your own Safari! Wow!!!
What is not fair? I said (twice I believe) that FireFox is best for those interested in high expandability. I do, however, believe that expandability aside, most users would benefit most from sticking with Safari, because I don't think most people want to bother with modifying their browsers in various fashions.
Yes, I tend to believe Apple stuff is superior. I am a male. So I guess that's a pretty good analysis actually.