No, just you
It's so sweet how you flatter FullofWin through a pathetic attempt of profile mockery. Try being your own person some time...
No, just you
The size "is not right" because it's not for iPad. It's not actually an iPad related rumor (although someone tried to make it to be one). It's an official Samsung announcement. Motorola uses panels made with this technology in their Altrix phones so this new panel very well might be targeted for next XOOM (and Galaxy Tab).
Exactly why I waited to get the TRUE iPad 2 (aka iPad 3). If the iPad 3 gets this type of screen, a world cell radio (GSM / CDMA) and thunderbolt support, I think many will see it as the iPad 2 in spirit.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
TUAW notes that Samsung is ready to demonstrate the industry's first 2560 x 1600 10.1" LCD next week at the SID Display Week 2011 International Symposium. The screen comes in at a screen density of 300dpi and is expected to become available for tablets later this year.
Such a high resolution display could pave the way for a true Retina display in a future iPad. We all got very excited earlier this year when it seemed that Apple was already prepping artwork for a double-resolution iPad of 2048x1536. At the time, one of the arguments against it was the lack of availability of such high density displays. TUAW points out that this particular display isn't likely to be used in an iPad but proves that such high density displays are just around the corner.
For what it's worth at least two analysts has predicted that the iPad 3 will indeed get a pixel-doubled Retina display.
Article Link: Samsung 2560x1600 Tablet LCD Paves Way for iPad Retina Display
Funny that the screen would have considerably more pixels than a 65 inch Sony Bravia, but people will expect it to still cost no more than today's iPad.
Funny that the screen would have considerably more pixels than a 65 inch Sony Bravia, but people will expect it to still cost no more than today's iPad.
question is will it go to Apple or will Samsung get to go after it first for themselves.
Can't wait for the iPad 3.
is it worth it on the 15inch macbook pros to pay the extra 150 dollars to jump from a glossy 1440 x 900 reoslution to the anti glare 1680 by 1080 resolution?
Funny that the screen would have considerably more pixels than a 65 inch Sony Bravia, but people will expect it to still cost no more than today's iPad.
The better question is when they are releasing competing tablets, e.g. the Samsung Galaxy, and they clearly have components engineers working their tails off to innovate, why would they possibly share their displays with a competing company, even though they can sell them en masse to apple, when they can make their own tablet superior to the iPad?
Foundries don't make the money, the label on the box makes the money. If you don't know this then think who makes more cash Foxconn or Apple? If they have any sense, they should promise apple this tech, and screw apple over right before they sell these components off, throwing off the iPad release date and making them boatloads by fabricating superior components in their own tablet, since they make nearly every piece of their own tablets anyway. This way, they'd be ahead of the curve, with an earlier release date, and a better device.
This display uses the odd PenTile sub pixel arrangement, which isn't really designed for both horizontal and vertical orientation.
This should have been on the ipad 2! I was dissaponted
Yes...now back to the iPad!
PS...my iPad 2 is very very worried it will be looking for a new home soon.
The better question is when they are releasing competing tablets, e.g. the Samsung Galaxy, and they clearly have components engineers working their tails off to innovate, why would they possibly share their displays with a competing company, even though they can sell them en masse to apple, when they can make their own tablet superior to the iPad?
Foundries don't make the money, the label on the box makes the money. If you don't know this then think who makes more cash Foxconn or Apple? If they have any sense, they should promise apple this tech, and screw apple over right before they sell these components off, throwing off the iPad release date and making them boatloads by fabricating superior components in their own tablet, since they make nearly every piece of their own tablets anyway. This way, they'd be ahead of the curve, with an earlier release date, and a better device.