Low quality? As opposed to what? How do you quantify quality?
As far as I've read, there's nothing low quality about them.
Indeed, neither did.Samsung announced these in April... Apple announced the Beats talks in May... who copied who here?
That appears to be lost in most discussions I've found. I am sure Apple and Beats will get together at some point to launch a product but yes the initial purchase was for the Beat subscription service primarily.If any of you think Apple bought Beats for their crappy headphones, think again. Everyone has been pretty open about it being more about the music subscription service, not the products.
Most firms copy others to some extent. Doesn't bother me in the least, it just gives me a choice. I buy the one that in my opinion is the best for the best price. Doesn't everyone do this? Or do they pay more for an inferior product because they only buy their tech gadgets from one company? Isn't that a little bit silly?
So you've tried and tested the Level Overs then?
I have a pair of Sennheisers, they're okay.
You are implying the Samsung headphones are low quality but expensive, but I'm guessing you haven't even tried a pair, let alone seen them.
Again, how do you quantify quality?