I was simply pointing out that if you wish to rebut a report with another URL (within a week, for example) you should use current sources, not outdated ones.
I have been very even-handed in my sources if you care to review my posts. For example, I have cited in the last week of my posts both a negative HTC report and a positive one.
One suggestion. Cut down on the "haters" bit. It would appear to be more appropriate to be used in a nursery school sandbox environment. I know from your posts that you are not like that, but if someone were to glance at your post cited above, they may get the completely incorrect impression.
I was purposely being over the top....the same way these so called analysts give an opinion about sales, supply chain concerns or just insert an reason...here________. They do this to manipulate stock prices and it works....very well. They have been doing this to Apple as the leader of the mobile space. In spite of reports of increased net profit....sales holding steady....even before a Apple product launch. It is stock price manipulation pure and simple......Now they are doing it to Samsung....
