Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SoonerChris

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 4, 2008
54
8
Just upgraded my mid 2009 MBP to a SSD drive. As well, I have Trim Enabler running as expected. I was thinking I would get 400+ speed both read and write but they are barely over 200. Any ideas?

NisW5Kt.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is your computer a SATA II interface? That would account for the slower speeds vs. SATA III.
 
Is your computer a SATA II interface? That would account for the slower speeds vs. SATA III.

If it were SATA II I would have a 3Gbps connection, correct? If so, that's IS what's slowing the speeds. So around 200 MB/s is where I'm going to top out?
 
Your Mac does have a SATA 2 interface, therefore the max speed is ~270 Mb/s.

But this is NOT what is important.

Courtesy "VirtualRain" :

"The problem with assessing storage speed is that vendors always publish sustained transfer rates (STR) or in other words, max sequential read/write speed. A typical laptop HD has a max STR of about 100MB/s. A modern SSD can do about 500MB/s. And you'd think, wow, that's 5x faster. And you're right, but that's not even close to the reason SSD's seem so fast.

The fact is, as I stated in my long essay a few posts back, is that most desktop usage is random small block I/O. On this kind of storage profile, access time becomes king... not STR. Now a typical laptop HD has an access time of around 5-8ms with extreme values of perhaps 100ms or more if the head happens to be on the wrong part of the disk. On the other hand, SSD's have access times around 0.04 or 0.05ms. Thats 100X better performance than an old-fashioned HD.

So the reason SSD's are game changers, is not the fact that they have 5x the sustained sequential transfer rate of an old HD. It's the fact that they have 100x less latency for random I/O. (Although as I said above, that 5x STR improvement coupled with RAID0 can become a game change for managing large media files)."
 
Your Mac does have a SATA 2 interface, therefore the max speed is ~270 Mb/s.

But this is NOT what is important.

Courtesy "VirtualRain" :

"The problem with assessing storage speed is that vendors always publish sustained transfer rates (STR) or in other words, max sequential read/write speed. A typical laptop HD has a max STR of about 100MB/s. A modern SSD can do about 500MB/s. And you'd think, wow, that's 5x faster. And you're right, but that's not even close to the reason SSD's seem so fast.

The fact is, as I stated in my long essay a few posts back, is that most desktop usage is random small block I/O. On this kind of storage profile, access time becomes king... not STR. Now a typical laptop HD has an access time of around 5-8ms with extreme values of perhaps 100ms or more if the head happens to be on the wrong part of the disk. On the other hand, SSD's have access times around 0.04 or 0.05ms. Thats 100X better performance than an old-fashioned HD.

So the reason SSD's are game changers, is not the fact that they have 5x the sustained sequential transfer rate of an old HD. It's the fact that they have 100x less latency for random I/O. (Although as I said above, that 5x STR improvement coupled with RAID0 can become a game change for managing large media files)."

Thanks. At least I'm getting better speeds than my 5400rpm spinning disk.
 
Samsung EVO 840 seems to be running slow

I was about creating a thread for same problem im facing too. I did the upgrade yesterday and got this
566e6080b5d5b45fe01667eceae3b5d6.jpg
. Is it normal? Its a 120gb samsung evo ssd on a 2012 mbp non retina
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was about creating a thread for same problem im facing too. I did the upgrade yesterday and got thisImage. Is it normal? Its a 120gb samsung evo ssd on a 2012 mbp non retina

No that's not normal. I have a 2012 cMBP as well with a 500GB EVO and it pegs the meters. Is yours installed internally or externally?
 
No that's not normal. I have a 2012 cMBP as well with a 500GB EVO and it pegs the meters. Is yours installed internally or externally?


Its installed internally. U said 500GB. I suppose speed increases with size of drive...am i wrong?
 
If it were SATA II I would have a 3Gbps connection, correct? If so, that's IS what's slowing the speeds. So around 200 MB/s is where I'm going to top out?

Right, those are the speeds you're limited to with that older Mac.

Just for a day. And yeah,trim is enabler

Something isn't right then. By what method did you install OS X? Was it a clean install, a restore from Time Machine or via Carbon Copy Cloner or other software?
 
Right, those are the speeds you're limited to with that older Mac.







Something isn't right then. By what method did you install OS X? Was it a clean install, a restore from Time Machine or via Carbon Copy Cloner or other software?


It was a clean install...i hope my ssd is not faulty
 
What could be the problem then? Or do i need to run the samsung data restore thingy?

I'm not really sure what the issue is at this point. All I have left is to try re-installing OS X again or, that, perhaps, the SSD is faulty.

Does it have the latest firmware on it?
 
I'm not really sure what the issue is at this point. All I have left is to try re-installing OS X again or, that, perhaps, the SSD is faulty.

Does it have the latest firmware on it?


Im not sure of how to check its firmware. But im thinking of doing the samsung ssd performance restoration thingy. Whats the catch
 
Im not sure of how to check its firmware. But im thinking of doing the samsung ssd performance restoration thingy. Whats the catch

It's in System Information under the Samsung drive. I forget precisely where though, since I'm at work and don't have any Mac's near me to look at.
 
Ok i just did a Performance restore off a cd. But im still getting same result. This is starting to bother me
 
The 120GB drive is measurably slower than the larger models in write performance (can be something like 25% slower in some cases), though your results still seem lower than expected.

The "restoration" software upgrades the drive to the latest firmware, and then does some data manipulation... otherwise "older data" (>30 days or some such) has horrendous read performance. On my 250GB EVO... before restoration I had seen performance drop to < 200mb/s, after back to 520 mb/s.

In your case hard to say... are you sure your disk is essentially idle when running the test?

In the absolute worst case...if you are really concerned, and willing to backup/reinstall, you can try to use Samsung's utility to "secure" erase the drive and then reinstall/restore your data... I have seen that resolve slowness issues in the past, but it may/may not have any impact in your case.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.