It's finally official:
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Sams...etal-made-and-the-thinnest-Galaxy-yet_id59293
Those who wanted better build quality (myself included) will be happy, although it's still plastic on the back (and on the front?).
Good specs except the battery.
Cool to have 4K video recording.
They say price is over 600$. Too much if you ask me just to have a metal frame.
No microSD, but 32GB of on-board storage might be enough for many.
Anyone interested in buying?
Well, it's not a beauty if you ask me, but that's highly subjective obviously.
I don't see a problem with the battery: Many people could get through the day with this and therefore don't want a thicker device: Good move.
What bothers me is the screen: I recall correctly the S3 had a 4.8" 720p display with a pentile layout and it looks rather washed out. On the other hand it matches the fact, that the battery is smaller than on a S4/S5.
Price seems ok since it will a) drop in price in the market and b) try to compete the iPhone which is at 700$ and fix.
All in all I wouldn't buy, but I can see what Samsung is aiming at and in my opinion it's a good idea: You can debate if they're clustering their phone section to much (I wouldn't do this if I were them), but it has its advantages.
----------
Too thin, people will drop it. Why is Samsung on this "thinner!!11!1!!!"-trip?
No Micro-SD? That's a joke.
Protruding camera - completely unusable on flat surfaces like Starbucks coffee tables.
Fail.
Thinner is very easy marketable, Apple understood this.
Samsung to date tries the: This thing has an HexaCore Ultra 4K triple Z 2.0 High Definition Processor... whatever this even means.
If someone absolutely not into tech goes into a store and sees a phone as thin as never seen before he will leave amazed (and probably with that phone).
Samsung's equivalent of Apple's making-it-thinner was making the screen bigger, but they're reaching the limits.
tl;dr Phone makers need something, that is visible on first sight and thus makes older phones feel dated.