An informed opinion can not be formed from those 2 pics cause they don't use the same scale on the vertical axis.
Really? Are Europeans cross with Audi, BMW and Range Rover? Are they angry with Toyota for making Lexus?
Samsung has the money for lawyers. They are larger than HTC, and can afford the fight. I must say though, Apple is becoming a patent troll. On some issues, I side with Apple, but these other claims are absurd.
I have to admit that it's nice to see Samsung standing up against Apple when it comes to all of this.
Do you understand what an opinion is?Galaxy SIII and Galaxy Note II have already blown iPhone 5 out of the water, of course I know Apple fanbois are not going to admit this.
Samsung does indeed have an R&D team.Does samsuck even have a R and D team?
Whoa. Samsung's newest flagship toppled Apple's year-old handset in one quarter in which Apple's newest phone had something like 9 days to sell.
Explain good faith.
Where in the article does it say Apple is trying to settle?
Previous discussions broke down because NEITHER party would concede
Apple can be friends with HTC because HTC isn't a threat to Apple. And HTC can't afford lawsuits - better to pay per device when sold then wind up in court.
Apple's trying very hard. At getting as most out of Samsung as it can. And guess what. Samsung is doing the same.
Maybe everybody is just getting tired of Apple's bullying and heavy handed tactics.
Not saying Samsung is without fault here. Their early Android phones did look an awful lot like the iPhone. But, Apple has borrowed as much, if not more, from Palm OS, Windows Mobile and Android, yet when they think somebody has copied or borrowed something from them they behave like the school yard bully.
I actually studied with a Director of Samsung in London who told me they pay people to go on to competitors websites and make negative comments, this would then draw an unhinged element to post comments favoring Sams**g on websites like this... a website for Mac, people are scared of Apple, because Apple has the best brand loyalty, hence the lines at a mac store hence they pay people to trash Apple. Scary stuff
Really? the lines comment? Wow.
Well guess what. My best friend's cousin's brother's nephews great aunt once had pizza with the VP of Samsung marketing and he called the Director of Samsung in London a bit fat liar liar pants on fire.
Again - people need to use less tin foil hats. The truth is scarier to you than this fiction - which is - people can own and enjoy Apple products but also br critical of them. OH NOZ!
Lol, love the comment in bold. How can you reinvent something that's already implemented? BTW, the first iPhone don't have an App store.
An informed opinion can not be formed from those 2 pics cause they don't use the same scale on the vertical axis.
MOD NOTE: Please take this time to refresh your understanding of the forum rules. Several users have taken this discussion beyond the rules for appropriate debate, please do not follow their lead.
B
----------
In the case of an apparatus patent, make, sell or use an apparatus that is described by the claims of an issued patent. i.e. do what you claimed.
B
As far as German brands are concerned I'd have to say yes. In fact over the past few years it has become increasingly difficult even for Germans to buy new German cars. This probably doesn't apply to BMWs, Porsches or Mercedes. But VWs and Audis? They cost way way more than they've had in the past. Obviously this doesn't make them any less desirable but people have started investing their money in less popular brands like Opel, Citroen, Alfa romeo etc. The desire for quality and performance is still there but many people are now willing to settle for less than what the premium brands have on offer.
PS.: Over the past 10 years I've split my time between London, Frankfurt and Athens and I don't recall ever seeing a Lexus...![]()
Seriously? I'm sorry, but Apple is the 21st century. You need to look beyond the US and see the big picture, here. Without Apple, we'd still be using phones the old fashioned way. Apple's contribution was to leverage technology to connect everyone and everything.You guys can hate on Samsung all you want, but nobody has rebutted the fact that Apple does NOTHING for the US economy except take consumer's money, does not pay much taxes, refused to build any jobs for us, stifles competition, etc.
A patent troll is someone who sits on their patents without practicing them and then sues someone who attempts to use the patented method or technology. You may think apple is overly litigious, but they do practice their own patents, so they are not a troll.
What's crazy is that even if they copied something to a T you would probably say the same thing.
Unfortunately for Apple, the judge in its case against Samsung in the US has agreed to review claims of misconduct against the jury foreman, who concealed the fact that he was the defendant in a lawsuit brought against him by a Samsung subsidiary and lost, which he told friends "ruined his life" and caused him to file for bankruptcy.
Another set-back for Apple is the US Patent Office invalidated 20 of its "rubber-banding" patent claims after the trial, including claims related directly to the case. This was based on the discovery of "prior art" that preceded Apple's patent application, proving it was not Apple's invention.
One of the invalidated patent claims was determined by the jury to be infringed upon by Samsung which forms much of the basis of the verdict. With the patent now invalidated, this throws the whole verdict into doubt since Apple should have never been granted that patent in the first place.
This leads to the question of how valid many of Apple's "design" patents really are.
Examples include Apple being awarded patents for something "that helps the touchscreen interpret whether the user wants, for example, to scroll up and down or switch between applications" and "allows the device to show an image on a screen with a second, translucent image over it".
No wonder the US Patent Office has been rescinding numerous patents it previously awarded to Apple. These examples are just ridiculous. The patent system was designed really for mechanical inventions, back when cutting-edge technology were electric lights, steam engines and the phonograph.
Now you can patent an IDEA or CONCEPT without actually executing it, or in these cases, writing the actual software for it. That's how Apple has all these nonsensical "patents" because they submitted every idea you can imagine, and weren't required to actually show working demonstrations of these "ideas".
The real issue is with what Apple is doing is they are basically trying to stop innovation in our world to further line their own pockets. Sadly most of the patents they are applying for they NEVER INTEND TO ACTUALIZE in a product. They only want to PREVENT any other companies from creating new products with these ideas so to block any profits for their competitors while they are trying to monopolize the market.
Sadly what this means for consumers is that Apple is preventing technological advances from reaching the market, meaning not only are the products available to us not as good as they can be, but that also we are increasingly given less choice in terms of product selection and being forced to choose only Apple given the US courts are helping them in achieving a monopoly in the United States.
It's worth noting that the US is the ONLY country where Apple has had any MAJOR success in their frivolous patent lawsuits. They have been defeated in the courts of practically every other country including a rather humiliating defeat in the UK where the court ordered Apple to post a humbling apology to Samsung on its website and in newspaper ads acknowledging Samsung didn't copy their designs.
Another sad fact is Apple now spends MORE money on lawyers, litigation and patent trolling than it does on research and development. They are paying lawyers and law firms literally billions of dollars every year on these lawsuits.
The really surprising thing is that Apple does NOT expect to recoup these legal fees even if they WON all their lawsuits. The BILLIONS in legal fees they spend every year DWARFS the potential damages awards they could win in these case. So the real reason they are suing is not for financial compensation but rather purely to prevent their competitors products from reaching the market.
How's that for "free trade". Rather than competing in the consumer marketplace by offering better products and value and letting the consumer decide the winner, Apple prefers to choose FOR the consumer by denying choice for the public and not having to compete by offering the best product.
On top of that, Apple has been refusing to PAY LICENSE FEES for using technology patented by other companies, and just lost patent lawsuits brought onto them by VirnetX and Motorola.
Oh, the irony! Apple is undergoing an ongoing crusade to stop its competitors from releasing their superior products around the world based on phantom "infringements" of their ridiculous "design" patents (most of them which are being thrown out and invalidated by the US Patent Office) and yet they are refusing to pay license fees to other companies for use of REAL technology patents?
Just goes to show what a two-faced hypocritical anti-consumer monopolistic company Apple really is. Sadly when once Apple was the anti-Microsoft, Apple has now BECOME Microsoft, Version 2.0.
I wonder how much Samsung pays people to come here and rebutt stuff said about them. These days it seems many MR posters are more passionate about defending Samsung as the greatest thing since sliced bread. Isn't there a pro-Samsung website/forum where you could do that? Why would anyone come to a site called MacRumors to read about how great and wonderful Samsung is?
And where are those manufactured most of the time?
That is ironically also a statement that sounds like it's coming from a fanboy.
I wonder if apple really knows what theyve done, embarrassing several chaebol execs in front of the world like that... this isnt probably going to be over for a long while...These guys play hardball. If Apple wants to settle, Sammy want them to beg.
Nice try, wrong, but still nice
really?, do you know how much of your Apple devices made by that "Washing Machine Manufacturer"?