Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That is so much better, inline with results others have posted for 990 Pros. I was wondering if Samsung had something to confess about current 990 batches.

Glad to see it was probably just a formatting issue. Or maybe the clean install did a TRIM on all the free space.

I'm guessing the fix worked for both of your 990 Pros?

I am now also wondering if it was a formatting issue like you suggested -- I noticed similar issue someone else reported on this forum:

Different configuration (TB to a USB4 enclosure), different drive (WD SN850X), and different benchmark (sequential I/O on Blackmagic) but he claims he had to format it on a PC first. Which maybe not so much that it needs to be formatted on a PC first but it needs to be formatted in a way that the Mac has no choice but to completely overwrite the format first. Perhaps in this case making it a boot drive similarly triggered a drive parameter/partition realignment/??? as did that reformat.
 
I am trying to understand the solution. You suggest that the problem was measurement errors from Amorphous DiskMark but you did eventually get normally results from it on that drive. Then it seems the drive worked better for random writes when you booted off it?

To sum up, I have two 990 Pros from different sources (Best Buy and Amazon). I first installed them as external drives using MacOS Sonoma, Sonoma was running on the internal Apple SSD. I ran Amorphous and got the low random writes. The 9100 tested normally.

I clean installed Catalina on the 9100 and booted from that. Fresh install of Amorphous, still low random writes on the 990's. 9100 still tested normally.

After ruling out the nvme adapter card, @mattspace recommended a clean install of MacOS onto the 990 and try booting from that. Once I booted directly from the 990, Amorphous finally got normal results. But even when booting from one of the 990 Pros, only the boot drive would test normally. Amorphous would still give low random write results for the storage 990.

ATTO Benchmark measured all drives with expected results no matter the OS or which drive I was booting from. Maybe it's a formatting issue, I originally formatted one drive as APFS and the other as MacOS Journaled. Both tested the same. Again, this suggests something wrong with Amorphous if ATTO tested the drives as normal the whole time.

I've now settled on the 9100 as my main boot drive and put the 990's into use as storage. I've copied millions of tiny files to them and they both are writing extremely fast. So the solution for me is use ATTO Benchmark to begin with. So it makes me think that there was never anything wrong with the drives.

@mattspace I forgot to ask - what made you think to try booting off the 990 Pro? That definitely solved it, just curious how you came up with that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bzgnyc2
@mattspace I forgot to ask - what made you think to try booting off the 990 Pro? That definitely solved it, just curious how you came up with that.

I'm booting from a 990 Pro and get normal results on both the boot drive, and my second 990 Pro that is also installed in the highpoint card.

It seemed a variable that could be controlled.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.