Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Willholmania

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Apr 8, 2021
6
0
I have a mid 2011 27in iMac with a 2.7ghz i5 which is running well. I also happen to have a 3.29ghz Sandy Bridge i5 CPU. Is there anything to be gained from putting it into the iMac? I'm pretty handy, so I could do the job myself at zero cost.
 
I have a mid 2011 27in iMac with a 2.7ghz i5 which is running well. I also happen to have a 3.29ghz Sandy Bridge i5 CPU.
I don't know for sure as I have never done it, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.

Is there anything to be gained from putting it into the iMac?
I think it would totally depend on what you do with the iMac, but I don't think it would be a huge difference in performance for most things.

Not sure what you do with your Mac, but if you things like video encoding, you would probably save reduce the encode times.


Personally, if I had the CPU and some free time, I would just give it a try. I would also do some tests with the old i5 and the upgraded one, and compare the results just to see the difference.

But again, I don't think it would be like a major upgrade. Changing the HDD to a SSD would give you a much more dramatic performance increase than changing from one Sandy Bridge i5 to another.

I'm pretty handy, so I could do the job myself at zero cost.
This shouldn't take too long to do, especially if you have already opening your Mid 2011 before. Maybe less than an hour, two hours if it is your first time.

The performance increase from changing that old thermal paste just might make the swap worth it.
 
Thanks. I use it for magazine design work, so I run a lot of InDesign and Photoshop. I already have a a pair of SSDs in it and it's a great machine. It's just that I already have the CPU so it seems rude not to stick it in.
 
I already have a a pair of SSDs in it and it's a great machine.
I love that model iMac.

A friend found one in the dumpster at his job, and let me have it when it wouldn't boot up for him. After swapping the HDD for a SSD and baking the GPU in the oven, I got it working, and it ended up being a maxed out BTO Mid 2011 27" iMac. The display was beautiful, and it was pretty fast, almost as fast as my Late 2012 iMac.

I ended up giving it back to him as he needed a new computer.

I recently bought one for my daughter for really cheap. I am installing a K4100m GPU in it, along with three SSDs, one in place of the ODD for Windows, and two in a SW RAID0 for the main MacOS boot drive.

Maybe I might swap the CPU as well while I have the logic board out.


so it seems rude not to stick it in.
You have to be careful, that is how my now 18 year old son was conceived.
 
Yeah - they're cracking machines. I've just bought another one for my wife. Maybe I'll try the 3.3ghz CPU in it just so mine is faster than hers.
 
The only real issue would be whether or not Apple included the Microcode to enable your i5 in the firmware. Which I assume is the 2500. If it has the Microcode it'll work. If not then it won't.

Although if I was to go with all the bother of tearing it apart. I'd buy a used i7-2600 and install it. Then sell the 2500. As it is faster and will work. Given that it was an option at the time it was built.
 
If you feel comfortable enough with the disassembly there’s no loss at least. Performance will go up a little but it’s going to be a very minor difference. - Since they are otherwise identical chips the difference in clock speed should fairly accurately depict the actual performance difference, though keep in mind it’s a base frequency and turbo/multi-core loading will alter results according to burst behaviour. It won’t be like a newer computer’s performance gains since generational improvements quickly outpace higher tiers within the same family of chips, but you’d probably see between 10 and 20% better CPU perf depending on task
 
The only real issue would be whether or not Apple included the Microcode to enable your i5 in the firmware. Which I assume is the 2500. If it has the Microcode it'll work. If not then it won't.

Although if I was to go with all the bother of tearing it apart. I'd buy a used i7-2600 and install it. Then sell the 2500. As it is faster and will work. Given that it was an option at the time it was built.
Thanks. Is it a particular i7 2600 I'd need, or are they all the same?
 
If you feel comfortable enough with the disassembly there’s no loss at least. Performance will go up a little but it’s going to be a very minor difference. - Since they are otherwise identical chips the difference in clock speed should fairly accurately depict the actual performance difference, though keep in mind it’s a base frequency and turbo/multi-core loading will alter results according to burst behaviour. It won’t be like a newer computer’s performance gains since generational improvements quickly outpace higher tiers within the same family of chips, but you’d probably see between 10 and 20% better CPU perf depending on task
So in practice it sounds like it wouldn't make a lot of difference. Maybe the i7 idea is better bet.
 
Thanks. Is it a particular i7 2600 I'd need, or are they all the same?

Yes just i7-2600 not 2600s or 2600k

Is this the one?


Yes
 
1. Others have tried, but none has been successful with a Sandy Bridge in iMac 2011.
2. The other days, I stumbled across a core i7-2700k. I think this is the maxed out core-i7 for iMac 2011.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.