So you screw over the early adopters? Highly doubt it.
Instead, Apple could move up the 6s/6s Plus release by 3-5 months.
So you screw over the early adopters? Highly doubt it.
i want iphone 6s super plus phone.....
----------
nfc
Based on some of the comments I've read here, I've never seen a bigger group of people so clueless about the benefits of sapphire crystal than those that hang out in here. The ignorance is just staggering on this issue.
No, it's not 'about the same' as gorilla glass in terms of scratch resistance, and neither is it so fragile it would shatter if you look at it funny.
Sapphire crystal is HUGE upgrade!
Personal experience or professional expertise? Which products? If we beg, will you share it?Although you correctly pointed out that my comments aren't inclusive of quantitative data, they are however based on personal real world experience.
Which sapphire crystal products do you have personal experience with? Not being snarky, just wondering.
So you screw over the early adopters? Highly doubt it.
I didn't realize how many people were looking forward to sapphire screens. Most will slap a screen protector on it anyway.
I don't have a lot of faith in the report either, but the inflexible deadlines are believable. Once the train leaves the station on a design, you're either on it or you're not. They'll wait to release a technology until it meets their really high standards, but once they've green lit a product release nothing stops it.this "missed it by two weeks" rumor is silly. Why would Apple scrap such a central feature instead of delaying the intro by two weeks? Or make the intro and say it ships in two weeks, not like that's never been done before!
Does call the objectivity of the report into question though.The latest information does seem to confirm that GT is on track to meet the production requirements set by Apple to receive the final prepayment from Apple. I am not thrilled with the latest production issues but it does make me feel a lot better even if my balance sheet is smaller knowing that GT was able to deliver the required sapphire for Apples iPhone 6 launch.
NFC is cool, but until POS compatibilty is ubiquitous, you still have to carry the credit cards. Not a selling point to me yet - but I'd use it if the phone has it (and if I used credit cards).
next year's iPhone 6S...
sapphire screen
A9
M9
better camera
2GB RAM
32GB entry level (no more milking the 16GB)
BAM! This is what I will be getting!![]()
NFC is cool, but until POS compatibilty is ubiquitous, you still have to carry the credit cards. Not a selling point to me yet - but I'd use it if the phone has it (and if I used credit cards).
Hopefully Apple will implement the sapphire displays on a later batch of the iPhone, perhaps by the first of the year or so? Just the first few months of production would have glass displays and it would be a good way for them to tweak things before the iPhone 6 Plus S goes into production.
You can imagine the disappointment to these who just splashed over £539 on the device, to find out that a week after the device have a better materials added to it![]()
iPhone 3Gs - S for Speed
iPhone 4s - S for Siri
iPhone 5s - S for Security (Touch ID)
iphone 6s - S for Sapphire
Well, Apple has managed to associate the S every time!
Wonder what the 7s will be...
iphone 6s - S for Sapphire
Stress tests show that the sapphire is more brittle when dropped but sustains better scratch resistance.
the current glass apple uses is fine by me. My 5 is naked from day one and I haven't received any scratches on the screen.
I'm not gonna even begin how wrong that is.
So by that logic the iPhone 6 screws over everyone who bought a 5S. Ditto for those who bought the iPad 3 and the iPad 4 was released several months before it would have been. Why are incremental improvements so wrong?
I was thinking several months later, not immediately.
Hopefully Apple will implement the sapphire displays on a later batch of the iPhone, perhaps by the first of the year or so? Just the first few months of production would have glass displays and it would be a good way for them to tweak things before the iPhone 6 Plus S goes into production.
So by that logic the iPhone 6 screws over everyone who bought a 5S. Ditto for those who bought the iPad 3 and the iPad 4 was released several months before it would have been. Why are incremental improvements so wrong?
iPhone 6 is basically the same phone as the iPhone 4 except bigger and faster.
Not fragile, brittle.
I don't doubt that some future iPhone will use a Sapphire cover, but this "missed it by two weeks" rumor is silly. Why would Apple scrap such a central feature instead of delaying the intro by two weeks? Or make the intro and say it ships in two weeks, not like that's never been done before!
It could explain the lackluster feature set though. If Sapphire display tech blew everyone away, Apple could keep their margins on the sly by going cheap on RAM and the 4.7" display resolution. Now people will notice that the 4.7" is a year or two behind Android phones on display, RAM, and SoC performance.
This is an unstable situation. If Apple expects industrial design to sell an iPhone perpetually 2 years behind Android phones, they are in for a nasty surprise. Especially if they don't find a Steve Jobs replacement to kick Ive in the arse now and then when he goes down a dead end design road.