Why the host Thunderbolt port ON THE FRONT?? That's like having a mouth next to your anus.. who designs these things?
Good observation. You are right, I just figured out that all the TB4 docks from market now have the same design, even from the same factory, just different shell. The host port placement should not be on the front. It defeats its purpose of using dock I believe. Dock should keep ur workspace cleaner not the other way around. I hope the factory people can redesign it and make it more practical for users to use.Why the host Thunderbolt port ON THE FRONT?? That's like having a mouth next to your anus.. who designs these things?
Some switch things up a bit but the base design is the same so I also think they may all come from the same factory or reference design.Good observation. You are right, I just figured out that all the TB4 docks from market now have the same design, even from the same factory, just different shell. The host port placement should not be on the front. It defeats its purpose of using dock I believe. Dock should keep ur workspace cleaner not the other way around. I hope the factory people can redesign it and make it more practical for users to use.
Probably because 96w is 24v * 4A (or 48v * 2A ?) which are the round numbers the USB power specs use. The Amps are what determines the cable build quality across the supported power modes from 5V to 24V and controlling Amps is the main thing that keep the magic smoke inside."…and up to 96W charging."
On the one hand, sure, it's only 4W to go from here to the next sensible round number. But again, it's only 4W. Why target such a specific number tied to a single generation of MacBook Pro when it's inevitably going to (and has already) become outdated? Would it have added that much to the cost to just spec this for 100W?
10Gb Ethernet means too many things. Technically 10Gb Ethernet over copper uses short, thick, expensive cables routed "just so"... or you're not really getting 10Gb. Optical Ethernet is a multi-protocol finicky beast that would utterly fail for home users, even IT people pay other IT people to run it at companies.10GB Ethernet please! For goodness sake!
Further proof that these companies just brand technology built in some obscure factory in China – without even being 100% sure of their specs. Anyway, my OWC TB4 dock works fine with a Mac mini M1.Yep, that would not surprise me. I was just curious because each manufacturer's website has conflicting info about the latest M1 compatibility. So say they do, others are unsure.
Should get my OWC tomorrow. I hope it does well for me.Further proof that these companies just brand technology built in some obscure factory in China – without even being 100% sure of their specs. Anyway, my OWC TB4 dock works fine with a Mac mini M1.
This is why I'm waiting for Tax Return season, hoping there's something better that comes along. Possibly something better from CalDigit. Seems like a lot of peripherals and docks/hubs lag about a year behind, and then it seems like the market's flooded with 'em.Like everyone said, all these TB4 have the exact same layout. I was going to get the CalDigit TB3+ but didn't want old technology for almost the same price as a TB4.
Was going to get the OWC TB4 but missed out on the Black Friday deal. And didn't know if its 96w or 90w charging since it seemed to misinformation. So it was OWC or Satechi and I was going to hold off as long as possible. The MAC25 code doesn't apply to the TB4 dock but I got an email that I get 15% everything and it was only for 2 days. Its a unique code and it worked on the TB4. I ended up getting it for $255 free shipping and no tax!
This may be a dumb question, looking to purchase the multimedia adaptor for my M1 Air. Can you run dual HDMI monitors AND your macbook as 3 different screens with this adapter? I have some cheapo basic hp hdmi monitors.Just an FYI - I've been using the USB-C Multimedia Adapter with my M1 MacBook Air, and can confirm that it allows you to run dual-HDMI monitors as fully functional extended desktops. It doesnt use DisplayLink, but instead requires you to install SiliconMotion instaview , which so far hasn't given me any issues.
Womp womp. But you could still plug two into the Mac directly and then use the Satechi in the third TB port for expansion, right?Will this do 2 x Apple Pro Display XDR @ 6K 60Hz?
Update: Satechi support says it will only drive a single Pro Display XDR @ 6K 60Hz
I guess this should not be an issue. each tb3 port has its own controller afaik there should not be any limitations by shared bandwidth.Womp womp. But you could still plug two into the Mac directly and then use the Satechi in the third TB port for expansion, right?