I'm surprised the point of sale units don't have FaceID to block unauthorized use.
The Isaac's are iphone XS models so they could theoretically but I've haven't checked to see if I could add my face to one but then every person would need to be assigned an Isaac.Perhaps Apple uses Siri to track the drawer?
"Siri, why are we $50,000 short in the drawer today?"
"I don't know what you mean by short in the drawer today... here's what I found online for short in the drawer today."
"No Siri, in the register drawer... accounting... accounting"
"I don't know what you mean by register drawer... accounting... accounting... here's what I found online for register drawer... accounting... accounting"
But more seriously: sounds like "Issac" needs some touchID or faceID.
I was going to say the same thing. I don't understand the reasoning behind using "combined years," as it's unclear (and, in this case, inaccurate). At first, I thought it meant that each person received 13 years, but maybe got 13 years on one charge and, say, 5 years on another charge, but they were to be served concurrently.Article title also states 13 years, but the article itself states it was about 8 years (60 months for one, 37 months for the other). Also I'm bothered by the use of "combined years" regarding sentencing. 100 people getting one year has a very different feel than "getting 100 combined years in prison".
Yes, they are iPhones. They have no modifications. They run the same iOS as every other iPhone.The Isaac’s use iPhones still don’t they? I’d have thought implementing FaceID into the terminal would make sense rather than having them sit there unlocked in the store.
Exactly. It won't. Not without a manager logging in on that exact device for each transaction to approve a price override.You would think that the ISAAC would not generate a digital gift code until it gets a payment source and that payment source was charged.
They didn’t steal cash so no, they don’t get to keep anything and will incur in massive losses and debt.So they get to keep $240,000?
Exactly. It won't. Not without a manager logging in on that exact device for each transaction to approve a price override.
Then it would also show up in sales reports. Something is missing here.
Is there enough Isaacs for each floor/sales team member to have one so they could enrol with the device at the start of a shift and then hold onto the single unit, or no? Biometrics seems feasible if the staff will use the one device for the shift. If they’re sharing devices then yeah, enrolling for biometric doesn’t seem feasible.there are a lot more employees and "Isaac's" at each store than you'd expect
only 1 Face ID can be used for 1 device may be ? and employees may not be comfortable using Face ID on Apple device ?I'm surprised the point of sale units don't have FaceID to block unauthorized use.
So how long should Tim Cook sentence in prison for scamming 30%(billions) from devs?
While tecnically different, people use the terms interchangeably. I don't think anyone's confused by it 😉
I believe that’s the Eastern District of Texas you’re thinking of."According to a press release from the United States Attorney's Office in the Northern District of Texas..."
The irony. Isn't this the same area that Apple, and pretty much any company with money, get's sued by patent trolls.
Not everyone. Jail is more like a smaller police precinct jails, whereas prison is the long-term facilities with high walls, showers, basketball courts, etc. Prisoners "live" at a prison for months or years. Those in a jail cell typically only stay there for hours, days or weeks at the most.