roland.g Suspended Oct 31, 2006 #2 First of all ! Secondly (^) & (..) Thirdly, what the (***) @ (!!!) makes you think that (---) & (+++) are going to be so *^.^.^* when you want them to --==--!
First of all ! Secondly (^) & (..) Thirdly, what the (***) @ (!!!) makes you think that (---) & (+++) are going to be so *^.^.^* when you want them to --==--!
mongoos150 macrumors 6502a Oct 31, 2006 #3 I have no idea what's going on in this thread. Are you on crack dude?
4JNA macrumors 65832 Oct 31, 2006 #5 or maybe hard drive response time...seek, read, and write -- oh my!
J JGamer macrumors member Original poster Oct 31, 2006 #6 kettle said: Has to be screen response time. Click to expand... oh sorry, if i wasn't clear... but i meant screen response time! I am belgian, i didn't know how to say this in english...
kettle said: Has to be screen response time. Click to expand... oh sorry, if i wasn't clear... but i meant screen response time! I am belgian, i didn't know how to say this in english...
kettle macrumors 65816 Oct 31, 2006 #7 JGamer said: oh sorry, if i wasn't clear... but i meant screen response time! Click to expand... I was searching google but it wasn't very revealing and I quickly lost interest, it doesn't seem like a highly publicised spec and the spec pages on Apple.com are old.
JGamer said: oh sorry, if i wasn't clear... but i meant screen response time! Click to expand... I was searching google but it wasn't very revealing and I quickly lost interest, it doesn't seem like a highly publicised spec and the spec pages on Apple.com are old.
J JGamer macrumors member Original poster Oct 31, 2006 #9 hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected
hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected
dmw007 macrumors G4 Oct 31, 2006 #10 JGamer said: hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected Click to expand... Wow, that is quite impressive. If that is indeed true, then the iMac has a faster response time then the ACDs. 🙂
JGamer said: hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected Click to expand... Wow, that is quite impressive. If that is indeed true, then the iMac has a faster response time then the ACDs. 🙂
M Macmadant macrumors 6502a Nov 2, 2006 #11 JGamer said: hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected Click to expand... , Highly unlikely, the ACD, are only 12Ms response time why would the imac displays be better than the professional displays
JGamer said: hmmm just found this : http://creativebits.org/apple_s_prosumer_mac 6 ms they're saying... much better then i expected Click to expand... , Highly unlikely, the ACD, are only 12Ms response time why would the imac displays be better than the professional displays