Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Anybody planning to use a 1TB SD for Time Machine?
Me - my 4TB Seagate Backup Plus drive just died (the second one to die). Looking on Amazon, it looks like the one to get is the SanDisk 1TB Extreme microSDXC UHS-I Memory Card with Adapter - Up to 190MB/s, C10, U3, V30, 4K, 5K, A2, Micro SD Card- SDSQXAV-1T00-GN6MA. Currently $121. Slightly faster than another one that is up to 150MB/s, C10, U1, Full HD, A1, MicroSD Card - SDSQUAC-1T00-GN6MA. And couple it with the BASEQI UHS-II Aluminum microSD Adapter for 2021 M1 MacBook Pro 14 & 16” (Space Gray).
How is that Sandisk working out?

Is there a better option?
 
Last edited:
B405DA5D-4F87-4BC2-A3AB-3A27EA0AF41F.jpeg
Read and write speed are always different!

Fastest one is "extreme pro", correct me if wrong...



 
UHS-III is not even available in 2023 so it's totally meaningless. Yes, someone made one or a few but doesn't mean UHS-III is widely being used. Hell, who even use UHS-III when CFexpress Type series are way faster? SD card standard is dead and only meant to be used for compatibility.
 
There are UHS-II models available even faster. (Look at the little logos by the "MicroSD" logo, The I means it's UHS-I.) Note that UHS-II is backward compatible, so will work just fine in any SDXC reader, but you won't get the maximum speed of a UHS-II card unless it's in a UHS-II reader. (Current Macs with built-in SD card slots are UHS-II.) UHS-II cards and readers have an extra set of pins behind the main pins.

Testing a ProGrade 128 GB UHS-II microSD card, I get 127 MB/s write, 238 MB/s read on my Mac Studio. This is tested using a UHS-II compatible micro-to-full-size-SD adapter (required for full speed.) When I test using a non-UHS-II adapter, I get 80/90.

The fastest UHS-I card I have is a SanDisk Extreme Pro 128 GB, with a write speed of 78 MB/s, read speed of 90 MB/s. This pretty much shows that without the extra pins for UHS-II, 80/90 is likely the maximum speed you'll see. Multiple other reviews online show similar - 90-100 MB/s is the absolute fastest you'll see on a UHS-I card.

My SanDisk Ultra 1 TB has roughly equal read speed, but half the write speed. I have never seen a 1 TB UHS-II. So if you want maximum possible speed, 256 MB is currently the limit. If you want maximum possible capacity, you'll be limited to ~100MB/s.
 
UHS-III is not even available in 2023 so it's totally meaningless. Yes, someone made one or a few but doesn't mean UHS-III is widely being used. Hell, who even use UHS-III when CFexpress Type series are way faster? SD card standard is dead and only meant to be used for compatibility.
"SD card standard is dead"? o_O

Outside truly *professional* cameras, CFExpress (or SDExpress) isn't common. Regular SD cards (SD-XC, UHS-II, et all) are still *FAR* more commonly used by devices.
 
"SD card standard is dead"? o_O

Outside truly *professional* cameras, CFExpress (or SDExpress) isn't common. Regular SD cards (SD-XC, UHS-II, et all) are still *FAR* more commonly used by devices.
It is dead cause UHS-III never came out and I clearly mentioned that SD card is only meant for compatibility. Other than cameras or some devices, they dont need fast speed at all.
 
This is the main thing, we are going back in time like 5-10 years and resetting progress. We'll now have SD cling onto life just that little longer. HDMI on the other hand I do think is here to stay as it is a standard, while I don't use it I can see value in having it. It is just disappointing that was a the cost of a TB4 port when right now I am having to unplug the charger, 10 Gbps ethernet, an external SSD, or even my monitor in order to have two card readers and two external drives connected and a hub can't fix that as each of these things needs the full bandwidth of TB3.
With low cost/storage and small size (micro-SD), I would not say that use of SD cards is resetting progress. My GoPro (bought in 2023, now, 1.5 years after this post), still uses micro SD. Not sure what Omro and other action cameras use. Given the (1) size and (2) price/storage, I see the SD card use as perhaps being in the prime of it's life, therefore I would not call effective and efficient use of SD cards any sort of regression. I'm glad the new MacBooks have the integrated, high-speed readers. I can also see where others would like another TB4. Hard trades to make.
 
There are speed and capacity bottlenecks in the SD form factor, and then the investment of putting newer tech in it can be considered regressive in the face of CFExpress picking up momentum. But the above GoPro example is a legit use case to stick with (micro)SD as long as possible. I'd say SD is not at its prime, it was probably when practically all non-Apple smartphones had a microSD slot, but now phones or other small form factor electronics have a tendency to use eMMC instead for better or worse. Devices that clearly need portability or disposable media swap like action cams or dash cams, will probably use it forever. Then some "serious" cameras especially SONY's, they have strategic reasons to stick with SD, not as much a technical reason.

It would have made a lot more sense if the SD slot stayed during the 2016-2020 touch bar MBP era, and then removed during the move with Apple Silicon, but it turned out the other way round. Apple's decision to put the slot back I'd venture to guess has a large part to do with PR than actual demand. It is very unlikely that there are more MacBook users needing the slot than 8 years ago.

What's interesting is the HDMI port, or its standard even, got more relevant in computing space though; during the Thunderbolt 1&2 era it was clear(er) that the computing industry would rather stick with DisplayPort, at least with hardware that involves Intel. It looks like there was a huge consumer push in TV sets and consoles that forced the port to be supported as well as possible on PC / Macs for now. What I mean is that the HDMI (2.1) port on Macs is more important than it ever was, especially right now it is a more capable video output than through DP alt-mode on the USB / TB route. So the MacBook Pro has to have a full sized HDMI port anyway, given its thickness that means adding an SD slot to the chassis is not much of a design-cost so Apple probably thought well there you have it. Conversely, if the SD slot was deemed important, they would have added that on the MacBook Airs as well. But one can argue it may be a case of product segmentation to only have it on the MBPs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rb2112
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.