How about this. Let me completely disable port data usage because I never use it for anything anyways.
I find it hard to believe (well, with Apple’s QC lately who knows) that an obvious oversight like this could happen.
In other news, if you leave your phone unlocked, someone can make it stay unlocked by playing with it.
I never understand why the people who use the machines to break into the phones don’t shut up about it. If you have a way in, fine, don’t advertise it. As soon as you do, apple then closes it And then you have to find another way.
So they spend a lot of time on making sure iPhone can't be hacked, but security in iOS isn't something they spend a lot of resources on? Doesn't quite seem like the statements really follow one another.Apple has never been good on security.
They invest a lot in terms of making sure the iPhone cant be hacked, sideloading apps etc... But security on iOS and OSX has always been something they don't spend a lot of resources on.
Why fishy?We can only wonder why USB restricted mode doesn't activate immediately by default. What's up with the strange 1 hour grace period? Seems fishy to me.
And you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. What a ridiculous thing to say.Apple has never been good on security.
They invest a lot in terms of making sure the iPhone cant be hacked, sideloading apps etc... But security on iOS and OSX has always been something they don't spend a lot of resources on.
No thanks. That would be another terrible development. I would hate it if USB audio interfaces didn't work anymore. And I'm sure there are a thousand more use cases relevant to other people.I know there are some people who use that port for other things but I do see it as the next step toward making the phone more dust / water resistant, secure, and "magical"![]()
Perhaps Apple could just require your passcode, FaceID, and/or TouchID every time a user connects to the lightening port as a deterrent. Would be inconvenient, but that's probably the only way now.
I find it hard to believe (well, with Apple’s QC lately who knows) that an obvious oversight like this could happen.
Still, at present its existence provides a potential avenue for law enforcement or other potentially malicious actors to prevent USB Restricted Mode from activating shortly after seizure.
I guess whenever a LEO does something you don't think he or she should be able to do, one could label the action as malicious.Nice choice of words here, MR. Really nice.
I guess whenever a LEO does something you don't think he or she should be able to do, one could label the action as malicious.
They will have a dummy adapter or charge cord in they glove box.Interesting, so the cops would need to confiscate the alleged evidence and transport it back to wherever they take it and then keep it plugged into the device. might be tough to do within an hour, but I'm sure they'll find a way. And I'm also sure Apple will find a way to close this loophole. Cat and mouse continues.