This is what they show for the 1210. I must have jumped to the conclusion that they are mini SAS. Four SATA ports is basically ok for me at 250. That is the best price in Europe that I can get. In the US you can get much better prices but it would add a lot of time + tax and duty which would make it similar in the end. If I have issues returns would also be PITA. So 1210 is what it will be.
The image is an ARC-1210. Internal MiniSAS connectors (
SFF-8087) look rather different though. Just look for the metal locking shield.
25 s additional boot time versus no RAID card is massive. I plan to use Bootcamp for Windows apps and it would add a minute to the change over of the OS. Very inconvenient! I will have a rethink on the whole plan. Is a fake RAID like the 1200 any faster in that regard?
It's not actually that bad, but it does drive me nutz, as I'm an impatient soul with such things. But I have to live with it to do what I need. What actually makes it worse than the 25s, and why it can drive you bonkers, is the fact there's a loop involved.
1. Load main board firmware
2. Load RAID card firmware (injects the RAID array into the main board firmware)
3. Reload main board firmware (NOW the system can see the array, and boot from it).
4. Go to disk, and launch OS
But if it's needed, there's no choice. It all comes down to need vs. priorities.
As far as firmware, I don't think the ARC-1200 would be different. The reason is, it's NOT a FakeRAID controller.

I checked the specs on it, and it actually is a
true hardware controller. It has a 500MHz processor and DDR2-400 cache on it. It also uses the same firmware (v.1.47 that's recently been released), so I wouldn't think it's much different at all (variances due to SATA or SAS controller, and port count).
What I need is 2 additional SATA ports with the same characteristic as those of the Mac's ESB2 chipset, so that I can put my SL booting RAID0 there. It would be ok to run those in SW RAID0 from disk utility as I do now. It is very stable and not affected by OS changes like Leo-> SL. For Vista booting I would need the card RAID0 and I understand that I need to use the MBR partition table there. I just hope that Winclone will work through this RAID0 because all my Vista backup is relying on that software. I would not want to go back to MS own backup again.
Keep in mind, no matter what you use, it's not the same chip or drivers, even if the OS is in control. So there's the potential for some unforseen issue. That said, Areca's not Highpoint. They actually design what they sell.
But I agree, software RAID is all that's needed for array management, and Fake RAID should be able to suffice. As far as backup software, I'm not familiar with Winclone, but you could try Acronis True Image 2009, if it doesn't work. That's what I use, and it can even restore a backup when the OS is trashed (via a Linux based Boot Disk you burn from the program). Rather handy it turns out.
Unfortunately, Areca is the wrong company to be looking for a Fake RAID controller. They just don't make them.
You might want to look for Sonnet Technologies, NitroAV,... Look for a 4 port, PCIe 4x lane unit that works well with Macs (boot + driver). I'm not sure about the EFI booting (members setup = ?), but they've been used before with success.
External eSATA would be an added convenience if I want to make external backups or migrate stuff off the machine without using the Gigabit ethernet port. I realise that I may have to use my spare ODD SATA port for that purpose and I would be hit by the fact that it is not hot swap capable. But I may have to experiment there.
I understand.
At any rate, you'd have to make sure what ever card you get, supports hot swap. A proper RAID card does, but the MP does NOT support hot plugging, and it can damage the PSU. Given the fact it's to be done with external drives (separate PSU's), it's doable with a proper RAID card. As per a Fake RAID unit, check the specs carefully.
Hope this helps.
