Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
52,212
13,853


Consumer spending on the top 100 non-game subscription-based apps across mobile platforms grew 34% year-on-year from $9.7 billion in 2019 to $13 billion in 2020, according to a new report by analytics firm Sensor Tower.

subscription-app-worldwide-2020-spending.jpg

According to the data, revenue from subscription apps purchased on the App Store and the Google Play Store represented around 11.7% of the $111 billion that consumers spent on in-app purchases last year, the same share as in 2019. In the fourth quarter of 2020, however, 86 of the top 100 earning non-game apps worldwide offered subscriptions, which is actually down slightly from 89 in the same quarter of 2019.

Reflecting a wider historical trend, spending on subscription-based apps in Apple's App Store was vastly more than in the Google Play Store:
Consumers have historically spent more on the App Store than on Google's marketplace, and the same holds true for subscription apps. Globally, the top 100 subscription apps on the App Store generated $10.3 billion in 2020, up 32 percent from $7.8 billion the previous year. The cohort of 100 top earners on Google Play saw $2.7 billion last year, up 42 percent Y/Y from $1.9 billion in 2019.
The only performance indicator in which the Google Play Store beat the App Store was in terms of year-on-year growth for U.S. user spending on subscription apps.
Looking at the U.S. App Store, consumers spent $4.5 billion in 2020 on the top 100 earning non-game apps offering subscriptions, up 25 percent from approximately $3.6 billion in 2019. While the top 100 earning subscription apps on Google Play did not generate as much revenue, they did see greater Y/Y growth. In 2020, the top Google Play subscription apps in the U.S. saw $1.4 billion spent, up 40 percent Y/Y from $1 billion.
top-grossing-subscription-apps-us-2020.jpg.jpg

Google was the big winner this year in terms of subscription app spending, both globally and in the U.S. YouTube was the subscription app leader across both stores, earning $991.7 million in gross revenue globally and $562 million in the U.S. It was also the top earning subscription app on the App Store.

Despite the numbers, the subscription apps generally divide App Store users between those for and against the revenue model. Apple began incentivizing developers to sell their apps for a recurring fee instead of a one-time cost when it made changes to its ‌App Store‌ subscription policies in 2016. Usually, Apple takes 30 percent of app revenue, but developers who are able to maintain a subscription with a customer longer than a year see Apple's cut drop down to 15 percent.

In late 2017, Apple began letting developers offer discounted introductory pricing and time-limited free trials on auto-renewable app subscriptions, based on the idea that subscriptions provide a higher likelihood of an engaged audience.

Article Link: Sensor Tower: iOS Users Spent $10.3 billion on Top 100 Subscription Apps in 2020, Up 32% Year-on-Year
 

EmotionalSnow

macrumors regular
Nov 1, 2019
176
493
Linz, Austria
Pretty crazy when you think of it. Android has a huge market share, but iOS payments appear to be nearly 4x that of the Play store. No wonder most Android apps are utter garbage - the money's in the other platform.

Mind you, piracy is rampant on Android...
The non existence of piracy on iOS is a consequence of only having one way to download apps.
 
Last edited:
Comment

jlc1978

macrumors 68040
Aug 14, 2009
3,186
1,535
Pretty crazy when you think of it. Android has a huge market share, but iOS payments appear to be nearly 4x that of the Play store. No wonder most Android apps are utter garbage - the money's in the other platform.

Exactly.

These results show how much value Apple brings to the table in return for the cut it takes. Apple's customer base brings in nearly 5x the revenue as Google's, which means for what is probably the same amount of development effort the upside for iOS is significantly higher.

That's why I think the whole "Apple's fee is too high" argument isn't valid since Apple offers access to a much more lucrative customer base than Google, even if Android has a larger market share. Companies may whine about Apple's cut because they want that for themselves (especially since Apple's cut is about the total for Google Play) but will not walk away because that's where they make the most money.


To put the fairness argument in another light, companies should cut the subscription fees significantly for iOS because they make a lot more from them for the same costs of development, and thus their margins are "unfair." I doubt any would agree with that yet that is essentially a main part of the argument they make against Apple's fees. It's not about fairness but about money.

The non existence of piracy on iOS is a consequence of only having one way to download apps.

Which, of course is a good thing for developrs as well as customers.
 
Comment

LFC2020

macrumors 68040
Apr 4, 2020
3,340
4,410
Pretty crazy when you think of it. Android has a huge market share, but iOS payments appear to be nearly 4x that of the Play store. No wonder most Android apps are utter garbage - the money's in the other platform.

Mind you, piracy is rampant on Android...
Don’t forget also how many $50-$100 android phones that are useless for anything, that still count as market share. You can buy really cheap android phones in Australia, running very old software and the only thing they are good for is phone calls and text msgs. Market share means nothing.
 
Comment

Vasilisxd

macrumors member
Sep 4, 2018
38
23
Well , android users can very easily get Pirated versions of pretty much everything that exists in Play Store.
 
Comment

FightTheFuture

macrumors 68000
Oct 19, 2003
1,530
2,047
that town east of ann arbor
They can, but beside few entusiasts, I doubt that many goes outside the Google Play for this kind of things.
Yeah I’d like to see those numbers. It took a little research to learn how to sideload apps on my Galaxy Tab. I think I had to enable developer mode or something.
Apple users seem to love Youtube, dating, movies, and music (lots of music apparently). Apple services... not so much.
Apple services revenue was at $15.7 billion last quarter.
 
Comment

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,764
14,750
In between a rock and a hard place
Yeah I’d like to see those numbers. It took a little research to learn how to sideload apps on my Galaxy Tab. I think I had to enable developer mode or something.

Apple services revenue was at $15.7 billion last quarter.
Context actually matters. Apple subscription app services, not the entire catalog. But I have a suspicion you already knew that.
 
Comment

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
7,764
14,750
In between a rock and a hard place
Apple services revenue wouldn't be factored in with what's listed there.
You're basing that opinion on what? They are apps in the app store that generate subscription revenue. Why would Sense Tower exclude them from their analysis?

Also every app listed on that chart for App Store Revenue counts towards Apple's overall Services revenue totals just like Apple's own subscription apps. I don't think Sense Tower makes a distinction between 1st and 3rd party apps. They just base the charts on App Store revenue.
 
Comment

lkrupp

macrumors 65816
Jul 24, 2004
1,148
1,906
thats astonishing consider android dominates the market by a wide margin.
Survey after survey, study after study, investigation after investigation have all come to the same conclusion. Apple users are generally more affluent than Android users and have more disposable income. To the point, Apple users spend money on apps and Android users don’t.

So in this case market share has nothing to do with anything.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: LeeW
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.