Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Garmin? I had to go back to July of last year to find a busy period.
1a35e75fdf1bd1ab8eb9d42b6a49c590.jpg


Used it a lot more in 2011-ish, then realized that (1) cycling and jogging didn't get me in as good of a shape as home videos and weights did, and (2) I never went back to look at the data.

84a6ae7067e7ba6334f85d405b5291c9.jpg
 
Then I'd assume you *should* know that GPS on a device like the Apple Watch, Garmin Fenix series or Garmin Forerunner series watches is for data calculation ONLY and is NOT intended to be for navigation purposes.... Your previous response(s) indicate you were under the impression that GPS on a device like this is used for navigation and that is 99.99% false... On a Garmin Edge cycling computer or something like that? Sure navigation plays a part but not on a watch, sorry..

On a watch it's purpose is data calculations like speed, distance, pace ect.. Without it in a watch you are reduced to using your phones GPS and that has issues all it's own. Like the need to carry the phone and GPS signal strength in already bad areas ect..
 
I was purposely leading you along.

Standalone GPS on a watch doesn't serve much purpose for me beyond (maybe) distance and speed calculation. It records a route, sure, which doesn't seem to be worth much past having something to print out and stick to the refrigerator.

People were all about slamming the Series 0 when it was introduced without GPS, but they didn't seem to consider how little functionality would really be added when there's no data connection. GPS-minus-data means no navigation, no Siri searching for Starbucks, and still no texts or calls while out on a run without the phone.

"Can the Series 2 show maps?" was a question for a while, at least until enough noobs realized how maps work on gadgets these days (always-available data, not preloaded maps like a decade ago).

For now, I still don't think the GPS chip by itself is enough of a feature to make an upgrade from a first-gen to a Series 2 worthwhile. As part of the total package, it's fine (and I think the revised construction is a more important upgrade). But I don't think buyers should expect the GPS to enable tons of new things for the AW to do.

Here's the last time I took my Garmin on a ride with my AW "S0" and phone. I'm not going to ride without a phone anyway, and because these numbers were basically identical (and ignoring the Garmin's ability to lose GPS for way too long), I nearly put the Garmin and all its accessories on Craigslist the next day. (maybe I should've because it's stupid cold now)

2470383aaf98ee4041ea285ece0b2c46.jpg

0e963d52821c4633ff7cbf3d798e0d11.jpg
 
Most pointless debate ever.

In a different thread maybe but this one is titled as going from a S0 to an S2 and GPS is one of the major reasons in my opinion to get the upgrade...

I do agree though, for some GPS is a non issue and some will upgrade for the other features the S2 offers but for some the addition of GPS is HUGE... It's just a matter of understanding what purpose GPS on the S2, or any fitness type watch for that matter, serves...
 
So my S2 stainless "refurb" arrived this morning. I put "refurb" in quotes because the watch was as pristine as a brand-new one, as one would expect from Apple.

I spent a fair amount of time navigating around to get a feel for the speed increase with the dual-core CPU. It is definitely smoother and faster, enough to make the watch more enjoyable to use, and enough to make it more likely I will try to do something on the watch rather than pulling out my phone. Lag and long load times can still happen, but they are less frequent, and the animations and transitions are much smoother.

Today was cloudy and rainy but tomorrow will be sunny. Looking forward to seeing the brighter display in the sunlight tomorrow.

And eventually I'll get the chance to swim with it.

My wife has no idea that I upgraded. Hers just left China and will arrive next Thursday. I may give her the gift early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BarracksSi
So my S2 stainless "refurb" arrived this morning. I put "refurb" in quotes because the watch was as pristine as a brand-new one, as one would expect from Apple.

I spent a fair amount of time navigating around to get a feel for the speed increase with the dual-core CPU. It is definitely smoother and faster, enough to make the watch more enjoyable to use, and enough to make it more likely I will try to do something on the watch rather than pulling out my phone. Lag and long load times can still happen, but they are less frequent, and the animations and transitions are much smoother.

Today was cloudy and rainy but tomorrow will be sunny. Looking forward to seeing the brighter display in the sunlight tomorrow.

And eventually I'll get the chance to swim with it.

My wife has no idea that I upgraded. Hers just left China and will arrive next Thursday. I may give her the gift early.

I would agree that the Series 2 is snappier. Mainly with loading times and updates. Overall, it really depends on how you use the watch with what applications. I wouldn't say it's a major leap over the first generation Apple Watch and speed, but certainly noticeable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redman042
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.