Setting up Spotlight

Discussion in 'macOS' started by Azathoth, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. Azathoth macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    #1
    I've been googling without success (and getting irritated with Google increasing crappification of their search engine with instant, and now crapifying glass).

    In any case I'd like Spotlight to do the following:
    1. index stuff like System Preferences (so that I can find "Sharing" preference pane directly from Spotlight)
    2. *not* index all the system ".c" and ".h" files

    I'm not able to figure out which dirs I should exclude from Spotlight Prefs -> Privacy (nor can I find the default settings for Spotlight)
     
  2. GGJstudios macrumors Westmere

    GGJstudios

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    #2
    Click the magnifying glass once to turn it on, again to turn it off.
    Spotlight indexes files and folders, not preference pane items.
    You can't exclude file types, only folders and drives.
    Why exclude anything? Just let it index everything and be done with it.
    What do you mean by "default settings"? By default, Spotlight indexes all files and folders.
     
  3. Azathoth thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    #3
    For a start, the above answer is one of the annoying aspects of MR: everyone things they're SJ and rather than provide assistance, they "helpfully" try to convince you that you're doing it wrong

    Except I have "tap to click", and clicking anywhere on the search result (which I tend to do when resting my fingers) brings up the preview image, so then I have to click to turn it off. Which is annoying (and was not a problem until Google changed the search), but I digress.

    Well my System Preference items appear when I use Spotlight (as they should)


    I just told you why I don't want it to index everything: I don't need to see .c or .h files...

    Ok, I assumed there were some default settings that I had overwritten at some point.
     
  4. GGJstudios macrumors Westmere

    GGJstudios

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    #4
    Speaking of annoying aspects of MR, it's annoying when someone asks for help in the forum, then criticizes those who take the time to respond. If you don't want people to post suggestions, don't post the thread in the first place.
    I don't think I'm SJ. I'm perfectly well aware of who I am.
    I did provide assistance. I answered your questions.
    I said absolutely nothing about you "doing it wrong".
    And I just told you that you can't exclude selected file types from indexing; only folders and drives. You can keep saying you don't want it to index certain file types, but that won't change the way Spotlight works.
    :rolleyes:
     
  5. Azathoth thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    #5
    I disagree with your glib response.

    Now, returning to the issue at hand... I gave the .h and .c files as an example - these (and many, many other files) are obviously in directories. If it's not possible to exclude file types, it's definitely possible to not index certain directories. Perhaps an adventurous user has a list of directories which they've told spotlight not to index?
     
  6. Bernard SG macrumors 65816

    Bernard SG

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    #6
    We don't know all files you want to exclude.
    For .h and .c they're most likely in the Developer (or Development?) folder under your Macintosh HD (or whatever name you gave to your HD).
    There's a simple way to make your list: open a finder window, search for specific files or extensions you want to exclude and at the bottom of your window, you should see the path to each file.
    And note that what you call a glib response that you disagree with actually answered your question.
     
  7. Azathoth thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    #7
    Yeah, I was afraid it would come down to manually going through typical exclusion directories, I was hoping someone else had already done this for a bunch of typical system files, because it seems like a fairly desirable thing to do.

    I'm not going to entertain the thread further with debating on the merits or the tone of individual responses, my opinions are clearly at odds with the rest of the MR universe and re-reading the responses does not change my view of the matter.

    Thank you to those who contributed.
     

Share This Page