Shake up at MS - Elop is out

Discussion in 'Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices' started by maflynn, Jun 17, 2015.

  1. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #1
    News is breaking about a re-org and Elop is no longer at MS.

    My gut tells me that this is another nail in the Nokia merger failure
     
  2. mrex macrumors 68020

    mrex

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2014
    Location:
    europe
    #2
    elop did what he was asked to do, now he is useless for ms...
     
  3. maflynn thread starter Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #3
    While maybe not exactly his fault, but I think failure of the windows phone to gain any actual traction is what doomed him. That and the move towards Microsoft being more service orientated, then wanting to sell phones.
     
  4. Even Longer macrumors 6502

    Even Longer

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Location:
    Head of a pin
    #4
    I am still curious, how Nokia's executive board and shareholders could accept the Trojan horse Elop as their CEO without raising any suspicions. It seems, he did everything for pushing the takeover price down, by ruining Nokia even further from inside.
     
  5. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #5
    Let's get off this rumor that Elop ruined Nokia. No, Nokia ruined Nokia. They were going to die regardless. If they would have stayed the course, they'd have died. And going to Android wouldn't have saved them either.
     
  6. Even Longer macrumors 6502

    Even Longer

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Location:
    Head of a pin
    #6
    Yes, indeed, Nokia was straggling at that time with or without Elop.
    Nevertheless, I still believe, that especially in such situation it was a mistake letting Elop preparing "perfect" takeover from the inside.
     
  7. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #7
    I disagree. Elop was the man with an actual plan. If Windows Phone had taken off, he would have been praised as saving the company. And Windows Phone should have taken off, in my opinion.
     
  8. Even Longer, Jun 17, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2015

    Even Longer macrumors 6502

    Even Longer

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Location:
    Head of a pin
    #8
    Windows phone should have taken off, sure, but I tend to believe, Microsoft had no plans watching it taking-off without having device manufacturing in house, and letting Nokia grow strong with it on its own.
     
  9. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
  10. maflynn thread starter Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #10
    Agreed, Nokia was in deep doo-doo (sorry for the profanity :p) when Elop arrive, yet they had a myriad of options. I don't want to arm chair quarterback them, but going all in on the MS platform was a fatal mistake. Trusting your company's very existence on a a platform that was struggling to get sort of traction is baffling.
     
  11. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #11
    It is baffling, but at the same time I understand it. Imagine it this way: Microsoft is a company that has had few giant failures in terms of making it into a market. Windows has huge share. You then think that Microsoft is going to hurl money at the problem to get marketshare (or play unfair, who could have guessed?). Betting all in on Windows Phone seemed like a good bet, and would have been in the 1990's.
     
  12. maflynn thread starter Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #12
    I can see an ex-MSer going on all in, but the board of directors should have been more resistant on such a risky endeavor. Yet with that said, its water over the bridge. They did what they did and now the windows phone is a failure.

    btw, I like the windows phone, I have one, and I just loaded up the latest beta. I don't use it as my sole full time phone but I have one. I'm not just hating on MS/Nokia but rather I would rather have seen them succeed. MS' new direction appears to be leaving the handset business behind.
     
  13. jeepik macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2009
    #13
    Why was Nokia going to die??? They were making FANTASTIC phones which were gaining ground in the market..they were never going to be #1..but they had a great product.. They should have stayed the course..but this was about rich men getting richer..plain and simple
     
  14. sracer macrumors 603

    sracer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Location:
    Land of Bongos and Beatniks
    #14
    Historically, Microsoft has made decisions to shuffle executives 3 months before they announce a change in their product portfolio. It gives the outgoing execs time to move on to something else while protecting the new guy ("hey, I just got here").

    If that continues to hold true, I'm curious as to what change is coming. I suspect that it will be Windows Phone and/or the Modern UI.
     
  15. Savor Suspended

    Savor

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    #15
    Nokia was in a damn if you, damn if you don't situation. Catch 22. Whatever option they chose, it wouldn't matter.

    I don't think Android would've saved Nokia but their nosedive wouldn't have been as quick. They wouldn't have been able stop the rising Samsung from toppling them. Nokia stuck to Symbian for too long and ignored the premium segment of the US market far too long like Sony does. By the time they released a new OS (which is now Sailfish), it was way too late. They pulled a BlackBerry on us. Had they chose Android in 2009-2011, perhaps they would be in a situation where they would be where the other pioneer is currently in - Motorola. A company passed around from Google to Lenovo making budget-friendly phones but hardly a Top 10 contender for the global market.

    I still would like to see Nokia rise from the ashes. They are one of the few brands I really like along with LG and Xiaomi.
     
  16. spinedoc77 macrumors G3

    spinedoc77

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    #16
    I hope it's windows phone. The whole Nokia merger always baffled me, a surface phone would be MUCH more powerful from a marketing standpoint. Of course a little of that is 20/20 hindsight since the surface wasn't really mildly successful until the surface pro 2. But if MS was gearing up so hard to release it's own hardware tablet I still wonder why they just didn't carry that over into a phone.

    MS is on the right track though. Continuum is going to be insane, literally the next evolution IMO. Having android/iOS support and also combining windows platforms into are also powerful reasons why MS is up and coming. I don't think they will take that big of a chunk out of Apple at all, Apple users seem content with simple software. But Android might suffer IMO. But yeah, a surface phone with digitizer/stylus that can run as a full desktop when docked and can run android/iOS apps, we'll see how much traction that gains. I know I'll be first in line for that.
     
  17. lowendlinux Contributor

    lowendlinux

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2014
    Location:
    North Country (way upstate NY)
    #17
    While this seems a bit hokey I'll give Nadella some wiggle room on this one as he seems to be righting the ship
     
  18. sracer macrumors 603

    sracer

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Location:
    Land of Bongos and Beatniks
  19. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #19
    Agreed. I never understood Nokia going with Microsoft instead of Android.
     
  20. Tig Bitties macrumors 68030

    Tig Bitties

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    #20
    Microsoft is being smart. Focus on their desktop OS #1, and Windows 10 looks to be the next gen Windows 7 in a good way.

    For whatever reason, a few years ago Microsoft dropped the ball big time in Mobile. The Metro themed Windows Phone 7 , just never caught on. The Live Tiles, and lack of apps, really hurt them, and Microsoft didn't react nearly quick enough to update and revise the OS. Now three years later, Windows Phone still looks and acts pretty much the same as the Nokia Lumia 920 that was supposed to save them back in 2012. They can only blame themselves for that.

    Actually, I thought Windows Phone 6.5, the one HTC made, was an amazing phone for it's day, like 5 years ago. Microsoft should have kept the OS in that style, and just progressed it from there, instead of radically changing it to the Metro thing.

    Oh well, too late now, Windows Phone ship has sailed. It's an Android and iOS world today.
     
  21. epicrayban macrumors 603

    epicrayban

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2014
  22. Tig Bitties macrumors 68030

    Tig Bitties

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    #22
    The Nokia we all knew and loved, is pretty much dead and gone now.

    Foxconn actually makes their phones now. And those new Foxconn phones will be running Android, with a Nokia nameplate on the phone. But really not Nokia anymore.
     
  23. Fernandez21 macrumors 601

    Fernandez21

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    #23
    How many of those are from Nokia, and what are the odds of Nokia hiring those laid off employees and starting up their handset division again?
     
  24. epicrayban macrumors 603

    epicrayban

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2014
    #24
    That's sad. They could've churned out a really good android handset.

    Imagine that fan render of the Nokia nexus.
     
  25. maflynn thread starter Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #25
    I think the writing is on the wall for windows phones - so sad. Yet in places around the world such as England and Ireland Windows phones have a much larger presence. I saw this tweet by Paul Thurrott.
    thurrott_tweet.png

    Given Nadellas approach to MS as a software/services company this shouldn't come as a complete surprise and I was expecting them to write off a the billions they paid for Nokia. Still its sad to see it occur and really leaves the consumers with less choices.
     

Share This Page