Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Martin29

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Nov 25, 2010
346
120
Quimper, France
With today’s ‘how to’ from apple, i got to wondering how everyone has been using portrait mode. PersoNelly I love it, and think you can get some incredible effects.

So here’s a thread to share your portrait photos. I’ll add one to kick things off
 

Attachments

  • 4DEDF7E1-C456-43C5-83DF-EDDCE918C4B1.jpeg
    4DEDF7E1-C456-43C5-83DF-EDDCE918C4B1.jpeg
    372.9 KB · Views: 148
  • Like
Reactions: jfim88
It can be anything where the focus is tightly defined on a specific subject. The iPhone camera portrait mode gives great control over both focal length and lighting presets in order to make interesting images highlighting the detail of a specific subject.

I like this one because it highlights the colours of an old industrial crane:

E092EDC3-2539-4928-8A3B-5D8E95F33B28.jpeg
 
This whole thread actually belongs either in the "Picture Gallery" section of MR or the iPhone section......


Aside from that, a portrait is usually meant to be an image of a person, either closeup head-and-shoulders or in a particularly meaningful setting, which is usually referred to as an "environmental" portrait.

Unfortunately, Apple has rather muddled the meaning and stretched its boundaries significantly by referring to its one particular feature on iPhones as "portrait mode," meaning that the main subject is emphasized and the rest falls into soft blurry background (bokeh). I'm sure they intended for portrait mode to be primarily used when shooting images of a person, or maybe one's pet, but clearly users have attempted to go beyond that and thus distorted the meaning of the word portrait altogether.

When I shoot something like this (not with an iPhone but with my Sony camera gear):

Joyful Yellow Rose.jpeg


It is not a "portrait." Yes, it is an image of a single rose and the background is intentionally blurry and meant to emphasize the primary subject, what we photographers usually refer to as "bokeh."

While I have shot occasional images with my iPhone 12 Pro in "portrait mode" just to see what would happen, and applaud Apple's attempts at bringing bokeh to the masses, I do think that their terminology has led to confusion and will continue to do so, which is unfortunate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MacNut and akash.nu
I find that a very restrictive, if not blinkered view of what constitutes a portrait.

Yes, traditionally, we think of a head and shoulders image… But that has long been extended to cover images of our pet animals. So why not inanimate objects too?

I didn’t start this thread for people to play semantics, simply to post images which they consider portraits… And given they’re taken with iPhones, likely in portrait mode.
 
No, it's not "a mode on the camera." It may be a mode on some P&S cameras and on iPhones but certainly it is not on cameras used by serious amateurs and by professional photographers.
A portrait is depth of field with the model usually head to shoulders in a sharp focus and a drop off of the background. Portrait mode is just using algorithms to get the same effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clix Pix
A portrait is depth of field with the model usually head to shoulders in a sharp focus and a drop off of the background. Portrait mode is just using algorithms to get the same effect.
I don't believe there's any requirement that a portrait involves a background that is less sharp than the subject. Portraits can be paintings, too, and I would guess a great many paintings have a more or less infinite depth of field.

Not sure why people here are so passionate about what constitutes a portrait. I think it was pretty clear from the beginning that the intention of this thread was to appreciate iPhone's portrait mode, regardless of subject matter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.