Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

moonman239

Cancelled
Original poster
Mar 27, 2009
1,541
32
A crystalline solid is harder to break, because the molecules in the solidare arranged in a defined order.

As far as I know, the only problem with using a crystalline solid is cost. The factory would need to melt the solid, and I assume all crystalline solids have a high melting point, so a factory would need to spend a lot of money on equipment capable of melting the solid, and the electricity required to melt the solid.
 
As far as I know, the only problem with using a crystalline solid is cost. The factory would need to melt the solid, and I assume all crystalline solids have a high melting point, so a factory would need to spend a lot of money on equipment capable of melting the solid, and the electricity required to melt the solid.

Well, when the "only problem" is a big problem then what do you expect them to do?

The officer of a specialty company that does make phones with sapphire screens was quoted as saying that Apple looked into it and decided that it couldn't be done on the scale they'd need it to be.

https://www.macrumors.com/2013/06/1...phire-crystal-displays-found-them-infeasible/

If it were possible I'm sure people like that guy would jump at the chance to sell sapphire screens to Apple. The fact that no one is offering that to Apple should tell you something.
 
I think that Gorilla glass is sufficient.

I'm already looking forward to future Gorilla Glass generations. They are developing an anti-microbial coating. But I am most interested in the glass becoming "tens of times more transparent than purified water", so that reflections are massively reduced.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.