Should Have Offered Two Screen Sizes

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by Alchematron, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. Alchematron macrumors 65816

    Alchematron

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    Maui Hawaii
    #1
    Would have made more people happy and prevented people leaving.

    Most of the debate has been about 50/50 for and against a bigger screen.

    Heck, I bailed last year for the EVO because of the bigger screen, but came back due to android being laggy.

    I love the smoothness of IOS, but feel locked in a box since Apple only offers one screen size! Kinda like a Ford Model T one size fits all.

    Forget the white option, it just gets covered with a case anyhow, just offer a bigger screen!

    What happened to "Think Different"?
     
  2. drb1992 macrumors 6502

    drb1992

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2011
    #2
    A bigger screen would have been nice, but it isn't a complete deal breaker for me.
     
  3. Gathomblipoob macrumors 68040

    Gathomblipoob

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    #3
    Same here.
     
  4. Demosthenes X macrumors 68000

    Demosthenes X

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    #4
    Adding a second screen size is not that simple. It requires development, different internal structure, different component sourcing, and different production line tooling and training.

    All in all, an expensive prospect.

    Apple no doubt decided that the extra cost of doing all this was not worth the potential extra sales of adding a second device.

    I imagine screen size is a major consideration for the next time they redesign the entire device (as opposed to just redesigning the internals). iPhone 5 will probably have it. I would never have expected iPhone 4S to have it - it was always going to be the same device, new internals.
     
  5. Alchematron thread starter macrumors 65816

    Alchematron

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    Maui Hawaii
    #5
    The whole industry trend is toward a bigger screen.

    Think of all the lost sales due to most android phones offering a bigger screen.

    A 4.3" screen would have been a great option.

    Its not like Apple does not have the money to pull it off.

    I get the feeling a marketing survey would have indicated people want a bigger screen, but Steve simply said no.

    Today is a sad day for all those who waited years and months for a bigger screen!
     
  6. OSMac macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    #6
    Almost 5 years and one screen size... strange.


    All the current phone needed was a bigger screen for many,
    instead of all the other fluff. These are no longer 'phones' first
    but data devices...
     
  7. Alchematron thread starter macrumors 65816

    Alchematron

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    Maui Hawaii
    #7
    [​IMG]

    After years and months of waiting, many were hoping for a Porsche like design, but when the curtain was pulled back, it was a Ford Escort :confused:
     
  8. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #8
    I agree, it is not the end of the world.
     
  9. brodas macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    #9
    This is exactly what I been asking for the last couple of months "options".
     
  10. Jagardn macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    #10
    I'm pretty sure by the amount of cash Apple has on hand, that they can judge markets pretty well. The Chinese have a lot more potential customers with smaller hands. :D
     
  11. Juan007 macrumors 6502a

    Juan007

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    #11
    You recognize that screen size is a tradeoff. What you gain in bigger size you lose in portability and battery life. So, it's a personal preference.

    So why not support two screen sizes? The answer is fragmentation. Apple wants to make things as simple as possible for developers so that they can target all X0,000,000 iPhones in the world and reliably know how their app will look on all of them. As soon as you switch to a new screen size, you throw away consistency.

    Fragmentation is what is killing Android now. Apple was wise to stick with 3.5. It's the perfect size. I don't need a 747 phone.
     
  12. OSMac macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    #12
    Just a larger screen with the same resolution would be fine.
    No fragmentation involved, all apps run as is.

    3.5 is too small for many today,
    particularly viewing mobile websites that often prevent zooming.

    iOS also lacks a text reflow feature which is very useful on Android.

    3.5" screen was amazing for a 'phone' in early 2007,
    but as a data device today its lacking.
     
  13. mpossoff macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    #13
    You want a mobile phone to be an entertainment center?

    I have an iPad for that.
     
  14. Alchematron thread starter macrumors 65816

    Alchematron

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Location:
    Maui Hawaii
    #14
    Anyone know why no text reflow in IOS?
     

Share This Page