Should I Get the dGPU Since it is the same price?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by greenbma, Nov 12, 2013.

  1. greenbma, Nov 12, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2013

    greenbma macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2013
    #1
    My late 08 is getting pretty laggy and need an upgrade. I want a 15in and figure 16 gigs and 2.3 since I plan on keeping it for 4-5 years and think I need the 512 so should I just get the dGPU even though I know I don't need it. Anyone know if it will significantly lower the battery life or increase the heat? Unless its a significant different I feel that I might as well get the best I can. This has been holding me up since the late 2013's were released and I really want to get one soon.
     
  2. spybenj macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    #2
  3. UBS28 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    #3
    Ofcourse, buy it now before Apple changes their mind and increases the price of the rMBP with the 750m.
     
  4. katorga macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    #4
    Got the dGPU

    I got the dGPU because it was in store, versus BTO. Score one for instant gratification.
     
  5. Orr macrumors 6502

    Orr

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
  6. MaclandValhalla macrumors member

    MaclandValhalla

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    #6
    Some apps trigger the dGPU erroneously, resulting in drastically worse battery life. Plus, there are weight concerns.
     
  7. Atomic Walrus macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2012
    #7
    There's no weight difference between the dGPU and iGPU-only models.

    You can keep the dGPU disabled with gfxCardStatus to prevent it from accidentally wasting battery, though this only works in OS X (in Windows it will always use the dGPU). It also forces the dGPU on when connected to external displays, but you should generally be plugged in if you're using an external display.
     
  8. Hitch08 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    #8
    I'm in the same boat as you. It's time to replace my late '08 MBP. I definitely want the 15in and the 512. On the ram, well, I've read WAY too many comments about 8GB vs. 16GB argument.

    If you take the lower end 15in MBP, upgrade RAM and the storage then the price is $100 less than the high end 15in. At that point, for an extra $100 you get the 2.3 (over the 2.0) plus the dedicated GPU.

    I keep hoping that AnandTech's review will help me decide.
     
  9. john123 macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #9
    For everyone except consistent Boot Camp users, it is simply a no-brainer.
     
  10. Hitch08 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    #10
    Which, to you, is to get the dedicated GPU?

    ^ Not trying to be a smart arse.
     
  11. john123 macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #11
    Yes. Absolutely. It costs you nothing if you're going with 2.3/16/512 already, and to use the language of the finance industry, it grants you option value. Plus half the reasons people give for not wanting a "dGPU" are flat-out wrong anyway when you take into account the real-world situation with the 750M and Iris Pro.
     
  12. dusk007 macrumors 68040

    dusk007

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    #12
    OSX users concerned about battery life will prefer the Iris Pro model. If you work somewhere like a university and have to often do presentations and such the battery life with the 750M will be worse.
    Also if you frequently unplug your external screen it is still a hassle with all the application relaunching. If you like to keep many apps running and often change take your notebook with you on the move away from the desk with the external screen, I'd prefer the Iris Pro.
    The 750M really doesn't do you any good in many usage scenarios. I think if I didn't play games in bootcamp I wouldn't even bother. SC2 performance seems fine with Iris Pro and the 750M doesn't seem to allow a really noticable significant jump in settings in my tests.
     
  13. john123 macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #13
    gfxCardStatus. Use it. I don't know why we have to keep going on and on and on about this.

    As for the 750M not giving any "noticeable jump," Anandtech's benchmarks this summer were more than adequate in demonstrating the advantage of the 750M, especially at higher resolutions. The difference is non-trivial.

    I continue to be utterly shocked by the people choosing to go sans-GPU while buying a 2.3/16/512. Utterly and completely shocked.
     
  14. dusk007 macrumors 68040

    dusk007

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    #14
    Did you read my post. gfxCardStatus fixes none of the stuff I wrote about. It only works in single monitor mode and you need to restart every dependent app everytime you disconnect from an external screen.
     
  15. john123 macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #15
    I did. My reference to gfxCardStatus was in regard to your first quasi-paragraph.

    The external monitor use case is not the norm for most users. The "hassle" of relaunches you referred to is a small price to pay for on-demand power, but I suppose that's an opinion. If it really makes you sleep better at night, we can add your use case to my original statement and now say,
    :rolleyes:

    I stand by the thrust of my original point. Gimping your new $2600 machine is utterly asinine.
     
  16. dusk007 macrumors 68040

    dusk007

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    #16
    At the end of the day it is utility and usability that makes it worth 2600$. If you just wanted speed you can have that way cheaper. If the things you do, don't benefit at all from a 750M it isn't really gimping. You increase utility and usability.
    This on demand power is a) much less than you'd think and b) if there is no demand, what is the point. How much of a hassle it is also depends a lot on what you do on a daily basis.

    BTW this new 750M isn't really a 750M at all. There is no Boost 2.0 which is supposed to be the tradmark feature of the 700M series. It is downclocked from stock and is virtually just the same as the old 650M. An actual full speed 750M would at least be more competition for the Iris Pro. This one might get beaten by some DDR3 750M models on the Windows side at some settings.
     
  17. tomtom101 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    #17
    Assuming the hdmi and display port both activate the 750m?
     

Share This Page