No. they just released a 13. it will be quite awhile before they replace it with a 14. Next up will be 16” MBP, higher-end 13” MBP, and iMacs.Thinking of holding out until then.
I think he's asking about the "upper tier" (4-port, 10th gen Intel) MBP13 replacement, not the lower-tier (2-port, 8th gen Intel) replacement, which we got today...No. they just released a 13. it will be quite awhile before they replace it with a 14. Next up will be 16” MBP, higher-end 13” MBP, and iMacs.
I think he's asking about the "upper tier" (4-port, 10th gen Intel) MBP13 replacement, not the lower-tier (2-port, 8th gen Intel) replacement, which we got today...
Yeah, probably not. But also doesn't make a whole lot of sense w/ the product lineup they have for MBP13 right now either. The "upper tier" Intel machines are probably going to be outdone in a lot of tasks by the lower-tier M1s, but you also can't get more than 16GB RAM, 2TB SSD, or 2 TB ports on the newer/faster machines.Wouldn’t make sense to simultaneously sell 13, 14 and 16 so soon after the announcements today.
Yeah, probably not. But also doesn't make a whole lot of sense w/ the product lineup they have for MBP13 right now either. The "upper tier" Intel machines are probably going to be outdone in a lot of tasks by the lower-tier M1s, but you also can't get more than 16GB RAM, 2TB SSD, or 2 TB ports on the newer/faster machines.
Do you think it will take that long until mini-LED makes it way to the MacBook line? I was hoping the 16 inch would feature this, but maybe this isn’t coming out until next fall.Still don’t think the upper tier will get 14” any time soon. I think a year from now, when they go to mini-LED. Wouldn’t make sense to simultaneously sell 13, 14 and 16 so soon after the announcements today.
(Heck, the “M1” may just be down-binned versions of this chip. Who knows)
Assuming the annotations here are right, this may already support >16GB RAM. I think 8 channels of LPDDR4X can handle at least 32GB, and probably more (i think each channel has a 6 bit command/address bus, but I’ve never worked with that standard). They may need to play with the timings and cache size, though - my understanding is that the RAM is on the same physical plane as the SoC (to enhance cooling), which means that if the 32GB or more of RAM takes more space then the read/write times get worse, which you’d need to compensate for in order not to lose performance. Any updates should be minimal. A bit more work would be increasing the i/o bandwidth to enable 4 USB-C/TB 3 ports. Still, not a ton of work. The sort of thing that takes one or two engineers 6 weeks. I’m guessing it’s already taped out and that’s why the 16” hasn’t been announced yet. (I’m also guessing it includes more firestorm cores)Apple showed a photograph of the M1's die during the keynote, a labeled version it's on the Anandtech review. Looks like it only has 4 high perf. cores there, so not binned down (at least not in core count).
![]()
Anyway, how difficult would you say it is to include >16GB RAM support and more bandwidth for additional Thunderbolt/PCIe ports when designing the SoC? It's the only thing where the M1 has fallen a bit short compared to Intel's offerings, and I would hope that the M1X greatly exceeds those limitations.
Do you think it will take that long until mini-LED makes it way to the MacBook line? I was hoping the 16 inch would feature this, but maybe this isn’t coming out until next fall.
What do you think of mini-LED vs 4K/5k iMac displays?
Do you think future Macs will utilize multiple M1 chips running in parallel as a way of boosting performance or will the more powerful systems run a variant of the M1?
Oh I see. Thanks for the insight! I was kinda worried since there are quite a few new limitations with the M1 (just 2 USB4/Thunderbolt ports, just one external display for the M1 MacBooks and 16GB RAM max). Not deal-breaking for the "low" end, but I hope there are no regressions for the high end in I/O compared to Intel.Assuming the annotations here are right, this may already support >16GB RAM. I think 8 channels of LPDDR4X can handle at least 32GB, and probably more (i think each channel has a 6 bit command/address bus, but I’ve never worked with that standard). They may need to play with the timings and cache size, though - my understanding is that the RAM is on the same physical plane as the SoC (to enhance cooling), which means that if the 32GB or more of RAM takes more space then the read/write times get worse, which you’d need to compensate for in order not to lose performance. Any updates should be minimal. A bit more work would be increasing the i/o bandwidth to enable 4 USB-C/TB 3 ports. Still, not a ton of work. The sort of thing that takes one or two engineers 6 weeks. I’m guessing it’s already taped out and that’s why the 16” hasn’t been announced yet. (I’m also guessing it includes more firestorm cores)
Unlikely. More like late 2021 or 2022Thinking of holding out until then.