It's 4 star compared to the American 2 stroke!The technical term is it's "icky" that's likely because it's dehydrated people pee in a bottle.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Shouldn't we just do away with diesel passenger cars and invest more in hydrogen fuel cell cars?
- Thread starter agkm800
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It's 4 star compared to the American 2 stroke!
That's like saying because I'm not 400 pounds I'm not fat.
As someone who has put a lot of miles in a Model S, I'll say it again. In the end, it's just not that big of a deal for the vast majority of use cases. The 29 mile per hour charge is at home, on a 240v circuit. But nobody cares how long it takes to charge at home, because your car is parked at home overnight pretty much every day. You need 400 miles of range in your ICE not because anybody routinely drives 400 miles at a go, but because it prevents you from having to go to the gas station every week. Several of the Tesla owners I know have never used a Supercharger in the entire time they've owned the car. My father - who puts the most miles on it - has used it several times, as have I - and it takes about 20 minutes to get ~140 miles of charge (it begins VERY fast - I've seen up to 340 miles per hour - as the battery is low, and then slows as it fills up, so the first 100 miles is extremely fast). Is it as fast or convenient as an ICE? No. But it's something that he does perhaps a few times a year, always on a longer drive, where he would be stopping for fuel/bathroom/food at some point anyhow. Fueling an ICE at a gas station is not a convenience once you realize that with an EV you do so at home the vast majority of the time. 100-150 miles per day in a Model S would be NO problem at all, right now.
That is not to say that concerns about range and charge time have no merit - they absolutely do and the Supercharger network, as vast as it is, is nowhere near extensive enough - but rather that the level of concern is generally overblown by folks who have never considered closely how they actually drive or how inconvenient refueling an ICE is already - we just forget about it because it is familiar and something we have always done.
No. Gas powered cars is the way to go. Electric cars are allegedly cheap to run until you have to pay for maintenance on a hybrid. They're one big con.
Then why are taxi fleets around the world switching to hybrids? Electric motors far fewer moving parts than combustion engines, don't require multi-speed transmissions, and reduce wear-and-tear on the brakes through the use of regenerative braking.
But with electricity the provider is able to choose how and where to generate it, and the waste products of generation can be contained. That gives scope (perhaps too much for many of the current vehicle makers) for development of the vehicles that use it. For instance, if recharging is too slow for some, why not have battery pack replacement as an option (like you would with your camera). Time to 'recharge' would be about 2 minutes, but it would cost more.
Current high maintenance costs are due to it being a niche product... for now.
I'll disagree with the bolded part; I have a diesel VW Beetle that gets 40-45mpg at interstate speeds (70-80mph), and it's a convertible to boot.
Um steam Engines are still around! How do think Nuclear Power gets power? How do Coal Plants make electricity?
I'll disagree with the bolded part; I have a diesel VW Beetle that gets 40-45mpg at interstate speeds (70-80mph), and it's a convertible to boot.
I'm a petrol-head, so i appreciate the sound, smoothness and performance of high-revving petrol engines, rather than fuel economy. Besides, 70 mph is parking speed.
There are 6 Tesla Supercharger locations within <30 minutes of my parents house in Connecticut (Greenwich Merit Parkway N & S, as well as Darien I-95 N & S and Milford I-95 N & S). Granted, I'm not in CT constantly, but I have never seen ANYONE using a supercharger and there are quite a few Teslas down there in the Greater NYC/Farfield County CT area.
Here in Boston, the nearest supercharger is in Dedham, which at best (zero traffic) is 30 minutes outside the city. It's the only Supercharger in the metro area and it's not really even on a major road (like I-95, I-90, or I-93). Massachusetts' offerings are pretty strange location wise, somewhat off the beaten path.
Most Taxis are Hybrids because of legislation (minimum mpg/emissions requirements, usually only met by hybrids) or incentives by the government to do so. For example, NYC require one of a few select hybrid vehicles unless you buy the official NYC Taxi of Tomorrow (Nissan NV200) or handicapped van.
In Boston, most taxis have been hybrids due to multiple incentives. They originally mandated all vehicles must be hybrids by 2015, but I think that got overturned. Regardless, pretty much all Boston taxis are Camry Hybrids.
Tesla's intention is to first make common point to point travel possible with the Supercharger network. As such, most superchargers are on the interstates in between major cities, and not in the cities themselves which are commonly the endpoint of a trip. We commonly travel between upstate NY and the Boston/Cape areas, and the supercharger locations as they exist now would be reasonably convenient for us to be able to drive a Tesla on those trips.
You never see any cars there in all likelihood because most Tesla owners do the vast majority of their charging at home.