Judge based on information... not on post count
Post count is irrelevant to life
Woof, Woof - Dawg
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
show post count?
- Thread starter dmmcintyre3
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Judge based on information... not on post count
Post count is irrelevant to life
Woof, Woof - Dawg
Judge based on information... not on post count
Post count is irrelevant to life
Woof, Woof - Dawg
There you go again, talking sense.
Stop it...
In addition, that post had a lot more question marks to it than just the fact it was from a newbie
Woof, Woof - Dawg
It was the easiest to find as it was on the first page of a stickiey and I knew where it was. I have seen a lot more than that one.
Post count isn't everything, or even relevant in the vast majority of cases, but it can be a factor. That's all I'm saying.
For instance, if someone posts in a completely assinine manner, and is asking a basic question, I might take the time to remind them to search, but only after I tried to help. If they've been around for a while, I'd be a bit less gentle.
For instance, if someone posts in a completely assinine manner, and is asking a basic question, I might take the time to remind them to search, but only after I tried to help. If they've been around for a while, I'd be a bit less gentle.
If they've been around for a while, I'd be a bit less gentle.
Oooooo, spank me!
Woof, Woof - Dawg
I understand that post count does not equal trustworthiness but if they say they have 1-5 posts* they are not to be trusted usually. But usually the more posts the better. (they can hide their newbie status with $25 but scammers usually do not.)
Why:
* or:
Why:
- they work for the company or are the owner
- they are scammers
* or:
- they only post about 1 company/product
- are banned on other forums
- They post referral links