Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sigma 17-70 mm any good?

Cole Slaw

Cole Slaw

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Hi all;
I recently bought a Canon Digital Rebel XS for my daughter. Pretty decent camera for the money (C$470). Only thing is, for that kind of money, it came with the Canon 18-55mm lens (the NON IS version).
I'd like to get her a better lens, and was wondering what you people thought of the Sigma 17-70 mm f2.8-4.5 DC Macro?
Is that lens decent quality?
Any opinions appreciated.
Thanks.
 
I used to own it for a Nikon - it's a great lens for the money.
SUPERB at the wide end - a bit of chromatic aberration at 70mm though - but perfectly reasonable for most people.

Other than that the only negative is that it doesn't have a constant aperture.

For the money you can't go wrong...
 
I use one on my S5. I like it. I enjoy getting close to things and pulling them into the wide angle. I have no real complaints about it, though I don't like the finish Sigma give their lenses.
 
Perhaps you are more careful. I only have a sigma 17-70 and a 70-300. I have a 18-70 DX Nikkor also, and have used a bunch of other lenses, sigma, nikon, and pentax manual. There is no doubt that the sigma have the most dreadful finish. They coat them with some matte nonsense which can be made white with a bit too much abrasion, and even come off in patches. It's not a *huge problem* but it would make me pay more for a lens from another manufacturer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back