Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Same. The UI was riddled with issues and they are finally fixing what has been obvious from the start. Pretty lame that they needed to wait for a new OS release to make these basic changes, like inconsistent window radii.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2638se
Me too. Sequoia's been so(!) stable for me, and reports on Tahoe so bad, that it hasn't made sense to go there. I skipped Sonoma too. Tried it two times, and had serious issues. IME, Catalina, Big Sur, Ventura, and Sequoia has been the good ones. Let's cross our fingers for 'Golden Gate'.
 
I have one machine that can't go below Tahoe & will be updating it to the beta. Hard to imagine the beta bugs being worse than what we still have in 26 half a year in.
 
Me too, but rather than a choice it's because my pre-T2 iMac won't run it.

Will probably miss Golden Gate too by the time I upgrade to an M6 or M7 mini.
 
me, i had an m1 pro 32gb of ram when Tahoe was released, ran awful on that machine. I later got an m4 pro, kept it on Sequoia ever since. This time, I'm gonna wait
 
I never understood this. I ran Tahoe since the public betas, and had no trouble. Mind you, I have an M3 Pro, so it runs perfectly well, certainly much better than on my friend's 2019 i9 MacBook. I will probably jump to 27 when the public betas launch as well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.