Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Seem like air or pro offer the same support of years as the basic iPad
The 5th-gen iPad Air has way too much power when compared to the 9th-gen iPad to get the same support. It’s highly likely to be supported for far longer. For content consumption it wouldn’t matter much, however. And I’d recommend never to update regardless (I have an iPad Air 5... running iPadOS 15).
 

Siliconguy

macrumors 6502
Jan 1, 2022
425
620
Seem like 9th iPad will only get around 4 years support from now which is pretty short period of time
They go by the last day it's sold as the current model, not by the year of introduction. The 2014 Mac mini is still supported running Monterey because it was the current model until 2018.

Anyway, if it serves your needs by all means wait for a sale and grab one. I'm fine with mine, but I have a real computer for actual work.
 

MacMan2013

macrumors regular
Jun 7, 2023
147
175
I have an iPad 9, got it Apple refurbished, very happy with it. 9 can run the latest OS and will probably be good for a couple more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,916
13,260
Seem like air or pro offer the same support of years as the basic iPad

The iPad Pros tend to be supported longer.

For example, the iPad Pro 12.9 (A9X/4GB) was released in 2015 while the iPad 5th gen (A9/2GB) was released in 2017. I believe neither are getting iPadOS 17 so that’s around 2 extra years of support for the Pro.

The 2017 iPad Pros will get the iPadOS 17 update.

Mind, I find the user experience on the Pro with 4GB RAM to be much better than regular iPad with just 2GB especially with newer firmware.

Given the 9th gen is around 1/2 price of the Air and almost 1/3 the price of the Pro though, the 9th gen is still a good option for light use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homme

drugdoubles

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 3, 2023
430
356
The iPad Pros tend to be supported longer.

For example, the iPad Pro 12.9 (A9X/4GB) was released in 2015 while the iPad 5th gen (A9/2GB) was released in 2017. I believe neither are getting iPadOS 17 so that’s around 2 extra years of support for the Pro.

The 2017 iPad Pros will get the iPadOS 17 update.

Mind, I find the user experience on the Pro with 4GB RAM to be much better than regular iPad with just 2GB especially with newer firmware.

Given the 9th gen is around 1/2 price of the Air and almost 1/3 the price of the Pro though, the 9th gen is still a good option for light use.

Yes thx
 

drugdoubles

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 3, 2023
430
356
They go by the last day it's sold as the current model, not by the year of introduction. The 2014 Mac mini is still supported running Monterey because it was the current model until 2018.

Anyway, if it serves your needs by all means wait for a sale and grab one. I'm fine with mine, but I have a real computer for actual work.

Not really, they were still officially selling Apple Watch Series 3 the second before they replaced it with SE and ended the 3 series got new watchOS right after they got it out of official Apple website.
 

Powerbooky

macrumors demi-god
Mar 15, 2008
686
627
Europe
For content consumption any iPad on any iOS version that’s iOS 12 or newer will be fine.

If you like the design and the headphone jack I think the 9th-gen iPad is a great choice.

I have a 9.7-inch iPad Pro on iOS 12 and it runs fine for content consumption, so an iPad 9th-gen on iPadOS 16 should be even better for that.

And if you have no issues with the Air 2 except for performance and battery life, I’d just keep it on iPadOS 16 forever and it will work fine for many years.

Anyone looking for a not so new iPad or iPhone to limit the costs, try to find a device that is released no more than two years earlier. Especially if you want to use current apps and digital services. Older devices might not be compatible anymore (DRM for example).

Our youngest (5) has a iPad Air 2 with 16GB. It does still work fine for most of the streaming services and some games. But there are some issues:
For example, the Disney+ app is not updated anymore for iOS12. Existing bugs remain. One is whenever this app is automatically removed from the internal storage, I have to fully delete it, download, install it and fill in the credentials before it can be used again. Sometimes episodes that were downloaded into the local storage cannot be deleted until the iPad is restarted.
But the biggest limite since it is iOS 12, it has no access to AppleTV+ and Apple Arcade. Also the movies in our digital library (iTunes movies) are visible but won't play (probably due to newer DRM which iOS12 does not support).

Then there's an issue with newer bluetooth headsets not reconnecting after a day or 2. Restarting the iPad often helps. Probably a bluetooth version compatibility issue. I experienced the same with an Apple bluetooth keyboard that came with a Mac mini in 2009. It works fine with all Apple stuff from the same period, but acts erratic when connected to our 2019 iPad or any other bluetooth device version 4.0 or higher.

(edited: typo in iPad model)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

Applɘ Aꙅylum

macrumors regular
Apr 6, 2022
128
102
It's not stupid to buy this nice iPad 9th 64gb if it's on sale which I got it for $249 when it was released. The reason? It has a 1080p front camera, Center Stage for FaceTime and the good old Home button. Runs great on iPadOS 17 beta 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer

Pakaku

macrumors 68040
Aug 29, 2009
3,273
4,844
Assuming a $30 difference really is on the line, I don't think that's enough to worry about. And if it is, maybe you should rethink your budget
 

okkibs

macrumors 65816
Sep 17, 2022
1,070
1,005
If you're willing to spend 15-20% more for a picture of an iPad on the box, why are you even asking the question in this thread. Just spend the money on it.
You are plain wrong. Microcenter has the 9th gen iPad in stock ready for pickup for $250, right now, every day, that's currently the regular price. Apple's refurbished price of $279 is clearly a ripoff when you pay more for a unit that contains used hardware. Amazon had it in stock at $270 previously too.

So OP should just get a new 9th gen from a retailer instead of paying this absurd Apple tax.

I have mentioned refurbished can make sense, but that's with the higher configuration iPad Pros where you can actually save hundreds. The cheapest models are better bought elsewhere.
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Anyone looking for a not so new iPad or iPhone to limit the costs, try to find a device that is released no more than two years earlier. Especially if you want to use current apps and digital services. Older devices might not be compatible anymore (DRM for example).

Our youngest (5) has a iPad Air 2 with 16GB. It does still work fine for most of the streaming services and some games. But there are some issues:
For example, the Disney+ app is not updated anymore for iOS12. Existing bugs remain. One is whenever this app is automatically removed from the internal storage, I have to fully delete it, download, install it and fill in the credentials before it can be used again. Sometimes episodes that were downloaded into the local storage cannot be deleted until the iPad is restarted.
But the biggest limite since it is iOS 12, it has no access to AppleTV+ and Apple Arcade. Also the movies in our digital library (iTunes movies) are visible but won't play (probably due to newer DRM which iOS12 does not support).

Then there's an issue with newer bluetooth headsets not reconnecting after a day or 2. Restarting the iPad often helps. Probably a bluetooth version compatibility issue. I experienced the same with an Apple bluetooth keyboard that came with a Mac mini in 2009. It works fine with all Apple stuff from the same period, but acts erratic when connected to our 2019 iPad or any other bluetooth device version 4.0 or higher.
Absolutely, I wouldn’t buy a device on iOS 12 now, both for compatibility reasons and for performance reasons: The iPad Air 1 isn’t particularly great on iOS 12, both battery life and performance-wise.

I have always said that the negative consequences of being on an earlier iOS version were vastly overstated, but I wouldn’t start the journey by being (soon) five versions behind. You will start with compatibility issues right away, and it’s not ideal.

I meant that for content consumption you don’t need the M1, any iPad that’s compatible with what you need will suffice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

drugdoubles

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 3, 2023
430
356
Absolutely, I wouldn’t buy a device on iOS 12 now, both for compatibility reasons and for performance reasons: The iPad Air 1 isn’t particularly great on iOS 12, both battery life and performance-wise.

I have always said that the negative consequences of being on an earlier iOS version were vastly overstated, but I wouldn’t start the journey by being (soon) five versions behind. You will start with compatibility issues right away, and it’s not ideal.

I meant that for content consumption you don’t need the M1, any iPad that’s compatible with what you need will suffice.

Air 2 can be updated to iOS 15
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Air 2 can be updated to iOS 15
I know, I assume it was a mistake on their part, because they said Air 2 but they also said that it was stuck on iOS 12, so I assumed it was the Air 1.

Unless they kept it on iOS 12 like I kept my 9.7-inch iPad Pro... but almost nobody does that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Powerbooky

drugdoubles

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 3, 2023
430
356
I know, I assume it was a mistake on their part, because they said Air 2 but they also said that it was stuck on iOS 12, so I assumed it was the Air 1.

Unless they kept it on iOS 12 like I kept my 9.7-inch iPad Pro... but almost nobody does that.

Anyway air 2 with iOS 15 still works fine nowadays, I don’t even remember iOS 17 is coming.
 

0339327

Cancelled
Jun 14, 2007
634
1,936
Seem like 9th iPad will only get around 4 years support from now which is pretty short period of time. Very likely Apple will cut 9th iPad, make 10th iPad $30 cheaper and make 10th the cheapest option in September, which is still much more expensive than 9th price now.

I only need a very basic iPad, don’t need the 10th new looking at all. Well O want to use it as long as I can and 9th few years left support seem like a bad deal. So what do you suggest?

I just bought a 9th as I don’t require all the bells and whistles for an iPad. If I were getting a computer, I would get the newest model, but an iPad is more for casual use and to run one app at a time. I figured why spend the extra money?
 

Lounge vibes 05

macrumors 68040
May 30, 2016
3,862
11,117
refurbished items normally are listed in Apple website for so many days, how could that be a good deal? If it is a good deal then people would fight for it then those refurbished items would be sold out in seconds, not listing there for days.
It's almost like we're talking about a multi trillion dollar company who knows how to keep their products in stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015

missingar

Suspended
Jun 22, 2023
310
719
You are plain wrong. Microcenter has the 9th gen iPad in stock ready for pickup for $250, right now, every day, that's currently the regular price. Apple's refurbished price of $279 is clearly a ripoff when you pay more for a unit that contains used hardware. Amazon had it in stock at $270 previously too.

So OP should just get a new 9th gen from a retailer instead of paying this absurd Apple tax.

I have mentioned refurbished can make sense, but that's with the higher configuration iPad Pros where you can actually save hundreds. The cheapest models are better bought elsewhere.
We were talking specifically about the value of Apple Refurb vs Apple full price not being enough because it's not "brand new" according to OP. Nothing about third party retailer prices. I don't think you read what I was responding to but for next time, context matters.
 
Last edited:

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Anyway air 2 with iOS 15 still works fine nowadays, I don’t even remember iOS 17 is coming.
Yeah, performance-wise it should be a lot better than the Air 1 according to what I’ve read. Battery life if the issue.

Are you more inclined to go for the 9th-gen? As always, there’s a variety of opinions.
 

drugdoubles

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 3, 2023
430
356
Yeah, performance-wise it should be a lot better than the Air 1 according to what I’ve read. Battery life if the issue.

Are you more inclined to go for the 9th-gen? As always, there’s a variety of opinions.

Thx for all suggestions. I will wait for Sept to see what will happen. If 9th gen is still a good choice but not available in Apple Store anymore, I just buy from Apple Renew.
 

Populus

macrumors 603
Aug 24, 2012
5,941
8,411
Spain, Europe
Absolutely, I wouldn’t buy a device on iOS 12 now, both for compatibility reasons and for performance reasons: The iPad Air 1 isn’t particularly great on iOS 12, both battery life and performance-wise.

I have always said that the negative consequences of being on an earlier iOS version were vastly overstated, but I wouldn’t start the journey by being (soon) five versions behind. You will start with compatibility issues right away, and it’s not ideal.

I meant that for content consumption you don’t need the M1, any iPad that’s compatible with what you need will suffice.
I have an OG 2013 iPad Air on iOS 12 and I agree with your experience. It feels very sloppy and old.

Also what others said above is true, maybe iOS 12 was a great system to stay on in 2019 or even 2020, but nowadays many apps are no longer compatible and it doesn’t receive security updates anymore.

While I agree that staying on an operating system that works well is a good option (i.e. I am using an iPhone 8 with iOS 15 to type this), once this system becomes 2, 3 yo or even older it starts to give more compatibility problems, both with third party apps and iCloud services.

That’s why the iPad 9 is such a great value. It runs iPadOS 16, 17, and will probably run iPadOS 18 and 19, and if you add to that a couple of years of security support, that gives you a fully functional iPad for the next 4 to 5 years. After that, I don’t think it will become unusable because it’s plenty powerful (especially if we take into account that it’s powered by an A13 and 3GB of RAM), so I think it’s a great deal for someone who wants a good, affordable iPad with a headphone jack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FeliApple

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
I have an OG 2013 iPad Air on iOS 12 and I agree with your experience. It feels very sloppy and old.
I don’t have an iPad Air 1, but I based this on tests I’ve performed on an iPhone 6 on iOS 12, and of what I’ve read about it. Yeah, not very surprising. Conversely, I do have the 9.7-inch iPad Pro on iOS 12, and that one is infinitely better. Battery life is still very good (relative to itself on iPadOS 16, around 23% worse than it was on iOS 9), and performance is very good too. It’s not perfect on either category (like it was on iOS 9), but it is certainly usable.
Also what others said above is true, maybe iOS 12 was a great system to stay on in 2019 or even 2020, but nowadays many apps are no longer compatible and it doesn’t receive security updates anymore.
Some compatibility issues are there, but I’d still call it mostly usable, unlike iOS 10, for example. I also have an iPhone 6s on iOS 10, and that one has a lot of compatibility issues.
While I agree that staying on an operating system that works well is a good option (i.e. I am using an iPhone 8 with iOS 15 to type this), once this system becomes 2, 3 yo or even older it starts to give more compatibility problems, both with third party apps and iCloud services.
I’d go a little further than that. I have an iPhone Xʀ on iOS 12 (my main iPhone), and compatibility is mostly fine, like I said.
That’s why the iPad 9 is such a great value. It runs iPadOS 16, 17, and will probably run iPadOS 18 and 19, and if you add to that a couple of years of security support, that gives you a fully functional iPad for the next 4 to 5 years. After that, I don’t think it will become unusable because it’s plenty powerful (especially if we take into account that it’s powered by an A13 and 3GB of RAM), so I think it’s a great deal for someone who wants a good, affordable iPad with a headphone jack.
I think this is the most important part: totally usable for a while, far more affordable than other alternatives, the final iteration of the beloved home button design, and the final iteration with a headphone jack. What’s there not to like?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

Annv

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2019
108
143
It's the last iPad with the headphone jack. Given Apple policies, the jack may be ditched in the next iteration. I find wired sound far superior to Bluetooth: I have tested them one after another, and the difference is obvious. I also had some unpleasant feeling in my head when listening wirelessly.

Wired earbuds are also way cheaper: EarPods cost $19, while basic AirPods start from $129 and are disposable as soon as the battery depletes.

I use an iPad 6th gen that's a few generations back, only has 2 GB of RAM, and it's fine for my needs: browsing, YouTube, gaming and the like. It's still supported, and even when it stops receiving new iOS versions, I think it will get security updates and be perfectly fine for a few more years.

The only downside is that shortly after I switch to the new app, the previous one is lost (gets reloaded). I'm fine with that, as I don't multitask.

P.S. I would also check if it doesn't cause you eyestrain. Some people, including myself, cannot use newer Apple tech due to eyestrain from screens.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.