Hi Guys,
It is absolutely mission critical that we have the utmost performance available when it comes to copying over the network, as we regularly deal with huge AV files. Previously, we've been copying over AFP and speeds have been great (over a gigabit network, usually getting ~110MB/s).
We've been doing some testing on Mavericks and have experienced some unfortunate results.
SMB2 is faster than SMB, however, it still isn't faster than the AFP protocol we are used to on ML.
Because of this, we decided to test out the AFP protocol in Mavericks. Bummer. It's slower than AFP in ML. How on earth did this happen? Have apple just nerfed their own protocol?
So anyway, I'm curious to know what experience you guys have had with this and if there's any solutions available.
If you'd like me to post my findings, let me know and I'll get them up.
Cheers,
eid0rb
It is absolutely mission critical that we have the utmost performance available when it comes to copying over the network, as we regularly deal with huge AV files. Previously, we've been copying over AFP and speeds have been great (over a gigabit network, usually getting ~110MB/s).
We've been doing some testing on Mavericks and have experienced some unfortunate results.
SMB2 is faster than SMB, however, it still isn't faster than the AFP protocol we are used to on ML.
Because of this, we decided to test out the AFP protocol in Mavericks. Bummer. It's slower than AFP in ML. How on earth did this happen? Have apple just nerfed their own protocol?
So anyway, I'm curious to know what experience you guys have had with this and if there's any solutions available.
If you'd like me to post my findings, let me know and I'll get them up.
Cheers,
eid0rb