Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

waloshin

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Oct 9, 2008
3,560
394
What is with all the questions of more than 8 gigabytes of ram with the new Macbook and the Macbook Pro? Does this mean the Snow Leopard will use more ram than Leopard, kinda like Xp to Vista? When in Xp 1 to 2 gigabytes or ram was sufficient, then when Vista came along you needed at least 2 - 4 gigabytes of ram.
 
Same requirements as Leopard I'd guess.

Apple are working on efficiency with this release not more bloatware.
 
I imagine it's going to still be a while before most apps are 64-bit. So wouldn't one of apple's goals in streamlining leopard into snow leopard be to decrease the ram usage when loading any combination of 32/64-bit apps?
 
There's not a whole lot they can do about it, tbh. I suppose they can work to lower the footprint of the libraries overall*, but that just changes the constant factor, not the multiplier. The main thing I can think of is leaning pretty hard on developers to get their apps running 64 bit.


*which is why I predict slightly lower usage when running 64bit only, despite larger pointers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.