Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Snow Leopard's 'Keyboard Viewer' Sparks Renewed Speculation Regarding Mac OS X-Based Tablet
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Sorry if someone has mentioned this before, but anyone seen this:
http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook
Seen it on the Gadget Show. Looks very good. Third Party Obviously.
Imagine, though, the control of a pen on the actual screen. Perhaps more control then a tablet attached to a Mac. The only thing is your hand getting in the way.
http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook
Seen it on the Gadget Show. Looks very good. Third Party Obviously.
Imagine, though, the control of a pen on the actual screen. Perhaps more control then a tablet attached to a Mac. The only thing is your hand getting in the way.
You know thats a good point. Apple doesn't usually overlook an issue like this. Unless it is designed for multi-touch screens. Right now the only use is to see what features happen when you press certain keys. Eg. I just learned from looking at it if I do a Function Delete I can back delete.
Fun to see how people speculate that it is a sign of a spaceship coming to save them from the 2012 destruction of the planet, when Apple take some liberties to redesign an App when they rewrite it in Cocoa.
Heck, Finder had quite a few changes with it's rewrite.
Though it was about time to update the thing to match the current keyboards, simply doing that it a drastic change for some people.
Heck, Finder had quite a few changes with it's rewrite.
Though it was about time to update the thing to match the current keyboards, simply doing that it a drastic change for some people.
Wow. Ok, do you walk around holding a Macbook or Macbook Pro trying to type in the street or do you carry it with you, to do work when you get to where you are going? Not to mention, I think it would be a lot easier to work on a tablet regardless of where one is. Look at the iphone as an example and you don't have to wait. Real portability friend, that's what Apple is aiming for, not just catering to fanboys (even though I am one).
A tablet would be pretty cool and I'm sure there are some folks out there that will find it fitting their needs, not enough to convince me though, there is only enough room for one ultraportable in my life and I'm getting my Macbook Air regardless.
That's ridiculous. You may as well say no one will ever buy another iPod touch because the iPhone is out. Yes, there is a lot of crossover between these products, but they do have different purposes and different features.
There will be more differences between the pad and the iPhone than between the iPod touch and iPhone. Who's to say the pad isn't aimed at a professional (e.g. graphic designer-style) audience anyway?
Job could've come out with the the fully fledged iPod rather than the bare bones first one. Alternatively, people could have invented cars before using horses for transport. Or invented electricity before using candles. Silly people
That's ridiculous. You may as well say no one will ever buy another iPod touch because the iPhone is out. Yes, there is a lot of crossover between these products, but they do have different purposes and different features.
There will be more differences between the pad and the iPhone than between the iPod touch and iPhone. Who's to say the pad isn't aimed at a professional (e.g. graphic designer-style) audience anyway?
Job could've come out with the the fully fledged iPod rather than the bare bones first one. Alternatively, people could have invented cars before using horses for transport. Or invented electricity before using candles. Silly people
The difference is that when Jobs sold the original iPod there were mp3 players with all kinds of features besides playing music. There were pda's. media devices, you name it. You think they just figured out how to add all these features later? Like they didn't have the technological capability to add those features? Like people didn't want them? lol
Jobs relies on simple people like this.
These are the kinds of people that buy a $400 iPhone and then buy a tablet that does all the same things just to be "cool".I agree with you on most points, but not on this one:
A tablet would not be a replacement for an iPhone or vice-versa. I can't see myself holding a 10" to my ear (you would look certifiable with a 15" tablet stuck to your ear...
As with most Apple products, they will probably think of a way to make them complementary like the iPhone with Keynote or the Apple TV if you just happen to own both.
What I meant by that is that if you have a tablet you don't need a iPhone with all that power. If Jobs had just offered the tablet first people would have kept their old phones and wouldn't have really "needed" anything more than that.
Having a cell phone that is a 400 dollar tablet is extreme overkill. People bought it because the tech behind it was so sexy. If the tablet was already out no one would have bothered getting all that tech on a phone. It's a HUGE luxury item.
Hopefully a touchscreen is coming sometime in the future. It is long overdue. Not sure why it took this long in the first place.
A 30in cinema display does not mean you get a 30in wide keyboard, for the last billion years screens have been measured diagonally. Just thought I would point that out, sweet none the less.
What would be so great about a touchscreen computer? What would you be able to do with it that you can't already do with your current computer? Use your finger to tap on icons? How would this be any better than using a mouse pointer?
Snow Leopard isn't any sort of conduit - all of those devices run OSX already. The only difference is in having AppKit (Aqua) on the desktop and UIKit on the iPhone. That's not going to change.
With Snow Leopard, Apple have ported CoreLocation and their Quicktime enhancements to regular OSX. Integrating Cocoa Touch with regular OSX is clearly going to be of interest to Apple, and if they haven't accomplished that with Snow Leopard and the unibody trackpads, they'll certainly be aiming to do that for 10.7. It's too large to happen in a point update.
I can imagine the device can run both, the iPhone OS and then a full fledged OS. Quite simply, the iPhone OS would be used if the user just wanted check some emails, browse the web, etc, stuff that can run on an ARM-based processor, so it's low-power. With better batteries that would mean maybe 10+ hours of battery life.
However if a user wants more than just email and webbrowsing, they can simply boot into the regular OS and use it like any other Mac.
Is this solution not possible?
I can definitely imagine Apple doing this; Asus made that laptop with a mini PDA build into the lid, Apple will just be using the whole screen instead.
It would explain this development in Snow Leopard and Apple's possible use of the PA Semi acquisition.
However if a user wants more than just email and webbrowsing, they can simply boot into the regular OS and use it like any other Mac.
Is this solution not possible?
I can definitely imagine Apple doing this; Asus made that laptop with a mini PDA build into the lid, Apple will just be using the whole screen instead.
It would explain this development in Snow Leopard and Apple's possible use of the PA Semi acquisition.
EXACTLY, it's not practical unless you're an artist. It's a niche market indeed. How am I going to hold it and type on it at the same time??
I also see alot of talk about the virtual keyboard. Well how the hell am I supposed to see the screen or what I'm typing in when the virtual keyboard is taking up all of the screen space?
'
hmm...
Apple developing Tablet device drivers package
Page has been updated very recently. This looking good!
http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/EventOverview/HandlingTabletEvents/HandlingTabletEvents.html
Page has been updated very recently. This looking good!
http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/EventOverview/HandlingTabletEvents/HandlingTabletEvents.html
First direct evidence for a Mac OS X tablet if you ask me. Not to say there hasn't been indirect evidence. The evidence for an iPhone OS tablet seemed to be quite good until recent rumors and then this page.
The rumors of some tablets running iPhone OS and other tablets running Mac OS X seem more likely to me now. This could be another step in making Mac OS X suitable for touchscreens on future Macsprobably one reason why Apple hasn't released a tablet yet.