Snowleopard -- shifting from gamma 1.8 to 2.2

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by bking1000, Jul 27, 2009.

  1. bking1000 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    #1
  2. toxic macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    #2
    it's easier in the sense that you don't have to change your display to 2.2 on your own.
     
  3. JFreak macrumors 68040

    JFreak

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Location:
    Tampere, Finland
  4. gavin83209 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 24, 2009
    Location:
    Yuuzhan'tar
  5. bking1000 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    #5
    Why the dislike? If we color correct the monitors, the results will look the same, won't they?
     
  6. peskaa macrumors 68020

    peskaa

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Location:
    London, UK
  7. JFreak macrumors 68040

    JFreak

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Location:
    Tampere, Finland
    #7
    It is a lot easier to target to print using 1.8 gamma.

    For what it's worth, that can also be said this way: "I have so much used to process photos with print in mind using 1.8 gamma that whenever I've tried another calibration I've failed".

    I'm just not that good ;)
     

Share This Page